Cargando…

Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins

Newborns are at high risk for identification errors due to their inability to speak and indistinguishable features. To reduce this risk, The Joint Commission requires hospitals to use a distinct identification method for newborns. Most hospitals create medical records for newborns at birth using tem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redman, Chelsea T., Reddy, Pooja, Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z., Applebaum, Jo R., Manzano, Wilhelmina, Goffman, Dena, Adelman, Jason S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356
_version_ 1783648761895976960
author Redman, Chelsea T.
Reddy, Pooja
Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z.
Applebaum, Jo R.
Manzano, Wilhelmina
Goffman, Dena
Adelman, Jason S.
author_facet Redman, Chelsea T.
Reddy, Pooja
Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z.
Applebaum, Jo R.
Manzano, Wilhelmina
Goffman, Dena
Adelman, Jason S.
author_sort Redman, Chelsea T.
collection PubMed
description Newborns are at high risk for identification errors due to their inability to speak and indistinguishable features. To reduce this risk, The Joint Commission requires hospitals to use a distinct identification method for newborns. Most hospitals create medical records for newborns at birth using temporary naming conventions, resulting in patients with similar identifiers. Typically, multiple-birth infants are distinguished from their siblings by a single character (1, 2, or A, B), placing them at higher risk for identification errors, which can delay care and compromise patient safety. METHODS: We present 2 unrelated cases involving naming errors in sets of infant twins receiving care in a healthcare system using Joint Commission compliant distinct temporary naming convention. RESULTS: In the 2 cases, system failures contributed to naming errors in 2 sets of infant twins, which resulted in delayed care. In the first case, twins were inadvertently assigned the same temporary name. In the second case, an infant’s blood specimen label did not include a single character, which distinguishes a multiple-birth infant from their sibling. Further safeguards are needed to reduce this risk. These cases illustrated the potential for misidentification related to newborn naming conventions during the registration process, especially between siblings of multiple-birth infants. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to determine strategies to prevent newborn identification errors. Potential strategies to reduce this risk and protect newborns include improving the design of newborn identifiers, systems-level interventions such as verification alerts, and improved registration processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78701702021-02-10 Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins Redman, Chelsea T. Reddy, Pooja Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z. Applebaum, Jo R. Manzano, Wilhelmina Goffman, Dena Adelman, Jason S. Pediatr Qual Saf Serious Safety Event Report Newborns are at high risk for identification errors due to their inability to speak and indistinguishable features. To reduce this risk, The Joint Commission requires hospitals to use a distinct identification method for newborns. Most hospitals create medical records for newborns at birth using temporary naming conventions, resulting in patients with similar identifiers. Typically, multiple-birth infants are distinguished from their siblings by a single character (1, 2, or A, B), placing them at higher risk for identification errors, which can delay care and compromise patient safety. METHODS: We present 2 unrelated cases involving naming errors in sets of infant twins receiving care in a healthcare system using Joint Commission compliant distinct temporary naming convention. RESULTS: In the 2 cases, system failures contributed to naming errors in 2 sets of infant twins, which resulted in delayed care. In the first case, twins were inadvertently assigned the same temporary name. In the second case, an infant’s blood specimen label did not include a single character, which distinguishes a multiple-birth infant from their sibling. Further safeguards are needed to reduce this risk. These cases illustrated the potential for misidentification related to newborn naming conventions during the registration process, especially between siblings of multiple-birth infants. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to determine strategies to prevent newborn identification errors. Potential strategies to reduce this risk and protect newborns include improving the design of newborn identifiers, systems-level interventions such as verification alerts, and improved registration processes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7870170/ /pubmed/33575520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Serious Safety Event Report
Redman, Chelsea T.
Reddy, Pooja
Kneifati-Hayek, Jerard Z.
Applebaum, Jo R.
Manzano, Wilhelmina
Goffman, Dena
Adelman, Jason S.
Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title_full Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title_fullStr Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title_full_unstemmed Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title_short Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins
title_sort incident reports of naming errors among two sets of infant twins
topic Serious Safety Event Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356
work_keys_str_mv AT redmanchelseat incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT reddypooja incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT kneifatihayekjerardz incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT applebaumjor incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT manzanowilhelmina incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT goffmandena incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins
AT adelmanjasons incidentreportsofnamingerrorsamongtwosetsofinfanttwins