Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review and evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies examining the efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of patients with deep burns. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Gaofei, Liu, Wenjun, Li, Jiamei, Wang, Di, Duan, Jianxing, Luo, Hanxiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023968
_version_ 1783648772793827328
author Zhang, Gaofei
Liu, Wenjun
Li, Jiamei
Wang, Di
Duan, Jianxing
Luo, Hanxiao
author_facet Zhang, Gaofei
Liu, Wenjun
Li, Jiamei
Wang, Di
Duan, Jianxing
Luo, Hanxiao
author_sort Zhang, Gaofei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review and evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies examining the efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of patients with deep burns. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and relevant references were systematically searched for RCTs and cohort studies published until the end of September 2020 to investigate the potential of blood purification in improving the prognosis of severely burned patients. The primary outcome of this systematic review was overall patient mortality; secondary outcomes included the incidence of sepsis and infection prevention (vital signs and routine blood tests). RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs and 1 cohort study were included, with a total of 538 burn patients (274 patients who received blood purification and 264 control patients). Compared with patients who received conventional treatment, those treated with blood purification displayed significant 2-day reduction in mortality and sepsis with relative risks of 0.62 and 0.41, respectively (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.74–0.82 and 0.25–0.67, respectively; P < .05). In terms of vital signs and blood biochemistry, the respiratory rates and blood urea nitrogen levels of patients in the blood purification group 3 days post-treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (randomized standard deviations (SMDs), 0.78 and 0.77, respectively; 95% CIs, 0.33–1.23 and 1.22–0.31, respectively; P < .05). However, there were no significant differences between groups on day 3 with regard to temperature (P = .32), heart rate (P = .26), white blood cell count (P = .54), or neutrophil count (P = .74), potentially owing to the small sample size or the relatively short intervention time. Heterogeneous differences existed between the groups with respect to blood urea nitrogen (SMD = -1.22; 95% CI, -2.16 to -0.40; P < .00001) and Cr (SMD = -3.13; 95% CI, -4.92 to -1.33; P < .00001) on day 7. No systematic adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Blood purification treatment for deep burn patients can significantly reduce the mortality rate and the incidence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78702172021-02-10 Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Gaofei Liu, Wenjun Li, Jiamei Wang, Di Duan, Jianxing Luo, Hanxiao Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review and evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies examining the efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of patients with deep burns. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases and relevant references were systematically searched for RCTs and cohort studies published until the end of September 2020 to investigate the potential of blood purification in improving the prognosis of severely burned patients. The primary outcome of this systematic review was overall patient mortality; secondary outcomes included the incidence of sepsis and infection prevention (vital signs and routine blood tests). RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs and 1 cohort study were included, with a total of 538 burn patients (274 patients who received blood purification and 264 control patients). Compared with patients who received conventional treatment, those treated with blood purification displayed significant 2-day reduction in mortality and sepsis with relative risks of 0.62 and 0.41, respectively (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.74–0.82 and 0.25–0.67, respectively; P < .05). In terms of vital signs and blood biochemistry, the respiratory rates and blood urea nitrogen levels of patients in the blood purification group 3 days post-treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (randomized standard deviations (SMDs), 0.78 and 0.77, respectively; 95% CIs, 0.33–1.23 and 1.22–0.31, respectively; P < .05). However, there were no significant differences between groups on day 3 with regard to temperature (P = .32), heart rate (P = .26), white blood cell count (P = .54), or neutrophil count (P = .74), potentially owing to the small sample size or the relatively short intervention time. Heterogeneous differences existed between the groups with respect to blood urea nitrogen (SMD = -1.22; 95% CI, -2.16 to -0.40; P < .00001) and Cr (SMD = -3.13; 95% CI, -4.92 to -1.33; P < .00001) on day 7. No systematic adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Blood purification treatment for deep burn patients can significantly reduce the mortality rate and the incidence of complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7870217/ /pubmed/33592850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023968 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3700
Zhang, Gaofei
Liu, Wenjun
Li, Jiamei
Wang, Di
Duan, Jianxing
Luo, Hanxiao
Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of blood purification in the treatment of deep burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023968
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanggaofei efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwenjun efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijiamei efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangdi efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanjianxing efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luohanxiao efficacyandsafetyofbloodpurificationinthetreatmentofdeepburnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis