Cargando…

The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment

Deep neck abscesses are dangerous. Artificial dermis combined with seal negative pressure drainage is a new technique for treating refractory wounds. To compare the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) with that of traditional incision drainage approaches for treating deep neck multiple spaces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Xiang, Chen, Wei, Yuan, Kun, Tan, Jian, Sun, Suguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024367
_version_ 1783648783125446656
author Gu, Xiang
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Kun
Tan, Jian
Sun, Suguang
author_facet Gu, Xiang
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Kun
Tan, Jian
Sun, Suguang
author_sort Gu, Xiang
collection PubMed
description Deep neck abscesses are dangerous. Artificial dermis combined with seal negative pressure drainage is a new technique for treating refractory wounds. To compare the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) with that of traditional incision drainage approaches for treating deep neck multiple spaces infections. This retrospective analysis includes patient data from our hospital collected from January 2010 to March 2020. A total of 20 cases were identified. Based on the treatment methods, the patients were divided into the VSD group and the traditional group. Inflammation indicators (white blood count, WBC), duration of antibiotic use, hospitalization time, doctors’ workload (frequency of dressing changes) and treatment cost were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Of the 20 patients, 11 patients underwent treatment with VSD, while the other 9 underwent traditional treatment. All patients were cured after treatment. Compared with the traditional group, the VSD group had a slower decline in the inflammation index, shorter duration of antibiotic use, shorter hospital stay, and lower doctor workloads (P < .001). There was no significant difference in treatment cost between the two groups (P > .05). VSD technology can markedly improve the therapeutic effect of deep neck multiple spaces infection. This treatment method can be used to rapidly control infections and is valuable in the clinic (P > .05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78702612021-02-10 The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment Gu, Xiang Chen, Wei Yuan, Kun Tan, Jian Sun, Suguang Medicine (Baltimore) 6000 Deep neck abscesses are dangerous. Artificial dermis combined with seal negative pressure drainage is a new technique for treating refractory wounds. To compare the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) with that of traditional incision drainage approaches for treating deep neck multiple spaces infections. This retrospective analysis includes patient data from our hospital collected from January 2010 to March 2020. A total of 20 cases were identified. Based on the treatment methods, the patients were divided into the VSD group and the traditional group. Inflammation indicators (white blood count, WBC), duration of antibiotic use, hospitalization time, doctors’ workload (frequency of dressing changes) and treatment cost were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Of the 20 patients, 11 patients underwent treatment with VSD, while the other 9 underwent traditional treatment. All patients were cured after treatment. Compared with the traditional group, the VSD group had a slower decline in the inflammation index, shorter duration of antibiotic use, shorter hospital stay, and lower doctor workloads (P < .001). There was no significant difference in treatment cost between the two groups (P > .05). VSD technology can markedly improve the therapeutic effect of deep neck multiple spaces infection. This treatment method can be used to rapidly control infections and is valuable in the clinic (P > .05). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7870261/ /pubmed/33592884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024367 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6000
Gu, Xiang
Chen, Wei
Yuan, Kun
Tan, Jian
Sun, Suguang
The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title_full The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title_fullStr The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title_short The efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
title_sort efficacy of artificial dermis combined with continuous vacuum sealing drainage in deep neck multiple spaces infection treatment
topic 6000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33592884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024367
work_keys_str_mv AT guxiang theefficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT chenwei theefficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT yuankun theefficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT tanjian theefficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT sunsuguang theefficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT guxiang efficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT chenwei efficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT yuankun efficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT tanjian efficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment
AT sunsuguang efficacyofartificialdermiscombinedwithcontinuousvacuumsealingdrainageindeepneckmultiplespacesinfectiontreatment