Cargando…

Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs

A comparative study on pharmacokinetics of four long-acting enrofloxacin injectable formulations was investigated in 36 healthy pigs after intramuscular injection according to the recommended single dose @ 2.5 mg/kg body weight. The drug concentrations in the plasma were computed using high-performa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Salah Uddin, Sun, Jichao, Cheng, Fusheng, Li, Bing, Arbab, Safia, Zhou, Xuzheng, Zhang, Jiyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.604628
_version_ 1783648826244988928
author Ahmad, Salah Uddin
Sun, Jichao
Cheng, Fusheng
Li, Bing
Arbab, Safia
Zhou, Xuzheng
Zhang, Jiyu
author_facet Ahmad, Salah Uddin
Sun, Jichao
Cheng, Fusheng
Li, Bing
Arbab, Safia
Zhou, Xuzheng
Zhang, Jiyu
author_sort Ahmad, Salah Uddin
collection PubMed
description A comparative study on pharmacokinetics of four long-acting enrofloxacin injectable formulations was investigated in 36 healthy pigs after intramuscular injection according to the recommended single dose @ 2.5 mg/kg body weight. The drug concentrations in the plasma were computed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. WinNonLin5.2.1 software was used to analyze the experimental data and compared it under one-way ANOVA using SPSS software with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The main pharmacokinetic parameters, that is, the maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)), the time to maximum concentration (T(max)), area under the time curve concentration (AUC(all)) and Terminal half-life (T(1/2)) were 733.84 ± 129.87, 917.00 ± 240.13, 694.84 ± 163.49, 621.98 ± 227.25 ng/ml, 2.19 ± 0.0.66, 1.50 ± 0.37, 2.89 ± 0.24, 0.34 ± 0.13 h, 7754.43 ± 2887.16, 8084.11 ± 1543.98, 7369.42 ± 2334.99, 4194.10 ± 1186.62 ng h/ml, 10.48 ± 2.72, 10.37 ± 2.38, 10.20 ± 2.81, and 10.61 ± 0.86 h for 10% enrofloxacin (Alkali), 20% enrofloxacin (Acidic), Yangkang and control drug Nuokang® respectively. There were significant differences among C(max), T(max), and AUC(all) of three formulations compare with that of the reference formulation. No significant differences were observed among the T(1/2) for tested formulations compare with the reference formulation. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed that the tested formulations were somewhat better compared to the reference one. The calculated PK/PD indices were effective for bacteria such as Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida with values higher than the cut-off points (C(max)/MIC(90)≥10–12 and AUC/MIC(90) ≥ 125). However, they were not effective against bacteria like Haemophilus parasuis, Streptococcus suis, E. coli, and Bordetella bronchiseptica where lower values were obtained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78704802021-02-10 Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs Ahmad, Salah Uddin Sun, Jichao Cheng, Fusheng Li, Bing Arbab, Safia Zhou, Xuzheng Zhang, Jiyu Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science A comparative study on pharmacokinetics of four long-acting enrofloxacin injectable formulations was investigated in 36 healthy pigs after intramuscular injection according to the recommended single dose @ 2.5 mg/kg body weight. The drug concentrations in the plasma were computed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. WinNonLin5.2.1 software was used to analyze the experimental data and compared it under one-way ANOVA using SPSS software with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The main pharmacokinetic parameters, that is, the maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)), the time to maximum concentration (T(max)), area under the time curve concentration (AUC(all)) and Terminal half-life (T(1/2)) were 733.84 ± 129.87, 917.00 ± 240.13, 694.84 ± 163.49, 621.98 ± 227.25 ng/ml, 2.19 ± 0.0.66, 1.50 ± 0.37, 2.89 ± 0.24, 0.34 ± 0.13 h, 7754.43 ± 2887.16, 8084.11 ± 1543.98, 7369.42 ± 2334.99, 4194.10 ± 1186.62 ng h/ml, 10.48 ± 2.72, 10.37 ± 2.38, 10.20 ± 2.81, and 10.61 ± 0.86 h for 10% enrofloxacin (Alkali), 20% enrofloxacin (Acidic), Yangkang and control drug Nuokang® respectively. There were significant differences among C(max), T(max), and AUC(all) of three formulations compare with that of the reference formulation. No significant differences were observed among the T(1/2) for tested formulations compare with the reference formulation. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed that the tested formulations were somewhat better compared to the reference one. The calculated PK/PD indices were effective for bacteria such as Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida with values higher than the cut-off points (C(max)/MIC(90)≥10–12 and AUC/MIC(90) ≥ 125). However, they were not effective against bacteria like Haemophilus parasuis, Streptococcus suis, E. coli, and Bordetella bronchiseptica where lower values were obtained. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7870480/ /pubmed/33575278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.604628 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ahmad, Sun, Cheng, Li, Arbab, Zhou and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Ahmad, Salah Uddin
Sun, Jichao
Cheng, Fusheng
Li, Bing
Arbab, Safia
Zhou, Xuzheng
Zhang, Jiyu
Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title_full Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title_short Comparative Study on Pharmacokinetics of Four Long-Acting Injectable Formulations of Enrofloxacin in Pigs
title_sort comparative study on pharmacokinetics of four long-acting injectable formulations of enrofloxacin in pigs
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33575278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.604628
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadsalahuddin comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT sunjichao comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT chengfusheng comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT libing comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT arbabsafia comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT zhouxuzheng comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs
AT zhangjiyu comparativestudyonpharmacokineticsoffourlongactinginjectableformulationsofenrofloxacininpigs