Cargando…

DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis

PURPOSE: The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains a challenge in daily clinical practice, and the optimal management algorithm is still being debated. Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) continue to range between 10 and 15%. This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of a diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malkomes, Patrizia, Edmaier, Franziska, Liese, Juliane, Reinisch-Liese, Alexander, El Youzouri, Hanan, Schreckenbach, Teresa, Bucher, Andreas M., Bechstein, Wolf Otto, Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02022-7
_version_ 1783648845934100480
author Malkomes, Patrizia
Edmaier, Franziska
Liese, Juliane
Reinisch-Liese, Alexander
El Youzouri, Hanan
Schreckenbach, Teresa
Bucher, Andreas M.
Bechstein, Wolf Otto
Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
author_facet Malkomes, Patrizia
Edmaier, Franziska
Liese, Juliane
Reinisch-Liese, Alexander
El Youzouri, Hanan
Schreckenbach, Teresa
Bucher, Andreas M.
Bechstein, Wolf Otto
Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
author_sort Malkomes, Patrizia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains a challenge in daily clinical practice, and the optimal management algorithm is still being debated. Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) continue to range between 10 and 15%. This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of a diagnostic pathway in acute appendicitis using clinical risk stratification (Alvarado score), routine ultrasonography, gynecology consult for females, and selected CT after clinical reassessment. METHODS: Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis between November 2015 and September 2017 from age 18 years and above were included. Decision-making followed a clear management pathway. Patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge. The hypothesis was that the algorithm can reduce the NAR to a value of under 10%. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included. In 65 of 69 appendectomies, acute appendicitis was confirmed by histopathology, corresponding to a NAR of 5.8%. Notably, all 4 NAR appendectomies had other pathologies of the appendix. The perforation rate was 24.6%. Only 36 patients (19.7%) received a CT scan. The follow-up rate after 30 days achieved 69%, including no patients with missed appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic pathway was 100% and 96.6%, respectively. The potential saving in costs can be as much as 19.8 million €/100,000 cases presenting with the suspicion of appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The risk-stratified diagnostic algorithm yields a high diagnostic accuracy for patients with suspicion of appendicitis. Its implementation can safely reduce the NAR, simultaneously minimizing the use of CT scans and optimizing healthcare-related costs in the treatment of acute appendicitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02627781 (December 2015)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78706372021-02-16 DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis Malkomes, Patrizia Edmaier, Franziska Liese, Juliane Reinisch-Liese, Alexander El Youzouri, Hanan Schreckenbach, Teresa Bucher, Andreas M. Bechstein, Wolf Otto Schnitzbauer, Andreas A. Langenbecks Arch Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains a challenge in daily clinical practice, and the optimal management algorithm is still being debated. Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) continue to range between 10 and 15%. This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of a diagnostic pathway in acute appendicitis using clinical risk stratification (Alvarado score), routine ultrasonography, gynecology consult for females, and selected CT after clinical reassessment. METHODS: Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis between November 2015 and September 2017 from age 18 years and above were included. Decision-making followed a clear management pathway. Patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge. The hypothesis was that the algorithm can reduce the NAR to a value of under 10%. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included. In 65 of 69 appendectomies, acute appendicitis was confirmed by histopathology, corresponding to a NAR of 5.8%. Notably, all 4 NAR appendectomies had other pathologies of the appendix. The perforation rate was 24.6%. Only 36 patients (19.7%) received a CT scan. The follow-up rate after 30 days achieved 69%, including no patients with missed appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic pathway was 100% and 96.6%, respectively. The potential saving in costs can be as much as 19.8 million €/100,000 cases presenting with the suspicion of appendicitis. CONCLUSION: The risk-stratified diagnostic algorithm yields a high diagnostic accuracy for patients with suspicion of appendicitis. Its implementation can safely reduce the NAR, simultaneously minimizing the use of CT scans and optimizing healthcare-related costs in the treatment of acute appendicitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02627781 (December 2015) Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7870637/ /pubmed/33210209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02022-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malkomes, Patrizia
Edmaier, Franziska
Liese, Juliane
Reinisch-Liese, Alexander
El Youzouri, Hanan
Schreckenbach, Teresa
Bucher, Andreas M.
Bechstein, Wolf Otto
Schnitzbauer, Andreas A.
DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title_full DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title_fullStr DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title_short DIALAPP: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
title_sort dialapp: a prospective validation of a new diagnostic algorithm for acute appendicitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02022-7
work_keys_str_mv AT malkomespatrizia dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT edmaierfranziska dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT liesejuliane dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT reinischliesealexander dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT elyouzourihanan dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT schreckenbachteresa dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT bucherandreasm dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT bechsteinwolfotto dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis
AT schnitzbauerandreasa dialappaprospectivevalidationofanewdiagnosticalgorithmforacuteappendicitis