Cargando…

Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks

Complex systems are challenging to control because the system responds to the controller in a nonlinear fashion, often incorporating feedback mechanisms. Interdependence of systems poses additional difficulties, as cross-system connections enable malicious activity to spread between layers, increasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turalska, Malgorzata, Swami, Ananthram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82843-8
_version_ 1783648851713851392
author Turalska, Malgorzata
Swami, Ananthram
author_facet Turalska, Malgorzata
Swami, Ananthram
author_sort Turalska, Malgorzata
collection PubMed
description Complex systems are challenging to control because the system responds to the controller in a nonlinear fashion, often incorporating feedback mechanisms. Interdependence of systems poses additional difficulties, as cross-system connections enable malicious activity to spread between layers, increasing systemic risk. In this paper we explore the conditions for an optimal control of cascading failures in a system of interdependent networks. Specifically, we study the Bak–Tang–Wiesenfeld sandpile model incorporating a control mechanism, which affects the frequency of cascades occurring in individual layers. This modification allows us to explore sandpile-like dynamics near the critical state, with supercritical region corresponding to infrequent large cascades and subcritical zone being characterized by frequent small avalanches. Topological coupling between networks introduces dependence of control settings adopted in respective layers, causing the control strategy of a given layer to be influenced by choices made in other connected networks. We find that the optimal control strategy for a layer operating in a supercritical regime is to be coupled to a layer operating in a subcritical zone, since such condition corresponds to reduced probability of inflicted avalanches. However this condition describes a parasitic relation, in which only one layer benefits. Second optimal configuration is a mutualistic one, where both layers adopt the same control strategy. Our results provide valuable insights into dynamics of cascading failures and and its control in interdependent complex systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78706592021-02-10 Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks Turalska, Malgorzata Swami, Ananthram Sci Rep Article Complex systems are challenging to control because the system responds to the controller in a nonlinear fashion, often incorporating feedback mechanisms. Interdependence of systems poses additional difficulties, as cross-system connections enable malicious activity to spread between layers, increasing systemic risk. In this paper we explore the conditions for an optimal control of cascading failures in a system of interdependent networks. Specifically, we study the Bak–Tang–Wiesenfeld sandpile model incorporating a control mechanism, which affects the frequency of cascades occurring in individual layers. This modification allows us to explore sandpile-like dynamics near the critical state, with supercritical region corresponding to infrequent large cascades and subcritical zone being characterized by frequent small avalanches. Topological coupling between networks introduces dependence of control settings adopted in respective layers, causing the control strategy of a given layer to be influenced by choices made in other connected networks. We find that the optimal control strategy for a layer operating in a supercritical regime is to be coupled to a layer operating in a subcritical zone, since such condition corresponds to reduced probability of inflicted avalanches. However this condition describes a parasitic relation, in which only one layer benefits. Second optimal configuration is a mutualistic one, where both layers adopt the same control strategy. Our results provide valuable insights into dynamics of cascading failures and and its control in interdependent complex systems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7870659/ /pubmed/33558578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82843-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Turalska, Malgorzata
Swami, Ananthram
Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title_full Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title_fullStr Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title_full_unstemmed Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title_short Greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
title_sort greedy control of cascading failures in interdependent networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82843-8
work_keys_str_mv AT turalskamalgorzata greedycontrolofcascadingfailuresininterdependentnetworks
AT swamiananthram greedycontrolofcascadingfailuresininterdependentnetworks