Cargando…

Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers

OBJECTIVE: Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend symptom-based screening and regular nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for healthcare personnel in high-risk settings. We sought to estimate case detection percentages with various routine NP and saliva testing frequencies. DESIGN: Simulation modeling study....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kevin, Shoukat, Affan, Crystal, William, Langley, Joanne M., Galvani, Alison P., Moghadas, Seyed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1413
_version_ 1783648905570811904
author Zhang, Kevin
Shoukat, Affan
Crystal, William
Langley, Joanne M.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
author_facet Zhang, Kevin
Shoukat, Affan
Crystal, William
Langley, Joanne M.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
author_sort Zhang, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend symptom-based screening and regular nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for healthcare personnel in high-risk settings. We sought to estimate case detection percentages with various routine NP and saliva testing frequencies. DESIGN: Simulation modeling study. METHODS: We constructed a sensitivity function based on the average infectiousness profile of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to determine the probability of being identified at the time of testing. This function was fitted to reported data on the percent positivity of symptomatic COVID-19 patients using NP testing. We then simulated a routine testing program with different NP and saliva testing frequencies to determine case detection percentages during the infectious period, as well as the presymptomatic stage. RESULTS: Routine biweekly NP testing, once every 2 weeks, identified an average of 90.7% (SD, 0.18) of cases during the infectious period and 19.7% (SD, 0.98) during the presymptomatic stage. With a weekly NP testing frequency, the corresponding case detection percentages were 95.9% (SD, 0.18) and 32.9% (SD, 1.23), respectively. A 5-day saliva testing schedule had a similar case detection percentage as weekly NP testing during the infectious period, but identified ~10% more cases (mean, 42.5%; SD, 1.10) during the presymptomatic stage. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the utility of routine noninvasive saliva testing for frontline healthcare workers to protect vulnerable patient populations. A 5-day saliva testing schedule should be considered to help identify silent infections and prevent outbreaks in nursing homes and healthcare facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78709132021-02-09 Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers Zhang, Kevin Shoukat, Affan Crystal, William Langley, Joanne M. Galvani, Alison P. Moghadas, Seyed M. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend symptom-based screening and regular nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for healthcare personnel in high-risk settings. We sought to estimate case detection percentages with various routine NP and saliva testing frequencies. DESIGN: Simulation modeling study. METHODS: We constructed a sensitivity function based on the average infectiousness profile of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases to determine the probability of being identified at the time of testing. This function was fitted to reported data on the percent positivity of symptomatic COVID-19 patients using NP testing. We then simulated a routine testing program with different NP and saliva testing frequencies to determine case detection percentages during the infectious period, as well as the presymptomatic stage. RESULTS: Routine biweekly NP testing, once every 2 weeks, identified an average of 90.7% (SD, 0.18) of cases during the infectious period and 19.7% (SD, 0.98) during the presymptomatic stage. With a weekly NP testing frequency, the corresponding case detection percentages were 95.9% (SD, 0.18) and 32.9% (SD, 1.23), respectively. A 5-day saliva testing schedule had a similar case detection percentage as weekly NP testing during the infectious period, but identified ~10% more cases (mean, 42.5%; SD, 1.10) during the presymptomatic stage. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the utility of routine noninvasive saliva testing for frontline healthcare workers to protect vulnerable patient populations. A 5-day saliva testing schedule should be considered to help identify silent infections and prevent outbreaks in nursing homes and healthcare facilities. Cambridge University Press 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7870913/ /pubmed/33427141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1413 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Kevin
Shoukat, Affan
Crystal, William
Langley, Joanne M.
Galvani, Alison P.
Moghadas, Seyed M.
Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title_full Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title_fullStr Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title_short Routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare workers
title_sort routine saliva testing for the identification of silent coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in healthcare workers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33427141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1413
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkevin routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers
AT shoukataffan routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers
AT crystalwilliam routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers
AT langleyjoannem routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers
AT galvanialisonp routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers
AT moghadasseyedm routinesalivatestingfortheidentificationofsilentcoronavirusdisease2019covid19inhealthcareworkers