Cargando…
The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiot...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3 |
_version_ | 1783648910130020352 |
---|---|
author | Juricova, Helena Matiasovicova, Jitka Kubasova, Tereza Cejkova, Darina Rychlik, Ivan |
author_facet | Juricova, Helena Matiasovicova, Jitka Kubasova, Tereza Cejkova, Darina Rychlik, Ivan |
author_sort | Juricova, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiotic resistance genes among chicken gut microbiota members in 259 isolates with known whole genomic sequences. Altogether 124 isolates contained at least one gene coding for antibiotic resistance. Genes coding for the resistance to tetracyclines (detected in 101 isolates), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics (28 isolates) and aminoglycosides (25 isolates) were the most common. The most frequent tetracycline resistance genes were tet(W), tet(32), tet(O) and tet(Q). Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae frequently encoded tet(W). Lachnospiraceae commonly coded also for tet(32) and tet(O). The tet(44) gene was associated with Erysipelotrichaceae and tet(Q) was detected in the genomes of Bacteroidaceae and Porphyromonadaceae. Without any bias we have shown that antibiotic resistance is quite common in gut commensals. However, a comparison of codon usage showed that the above-mentioned families represent the most common current reservoirs but probably not the original host of the detected resistances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7870933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78709332021-02-10 The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals Juricova, Helena Matiasovicova, Jitka Kubasova, Tereza Cejkova, Darina Rychlik, Ivan Sci Rep Article Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiotic resistance genes among chicken gut microbiota members in 259 isolates with known whole genomic sequences. Altogether 124 isolates contained at least one gene coding for antibiotic resistance. Genes coding for the resistance to tetracyclines (detected in 101 isolates), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics (28 isolates) and aminoglycosides (25 isolates) were the most common. The most frequent tetracycline resistance genes were tet(W), tet(32), tet(O) and tet(Q). Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae frequently encoded tet(W). Lachnospiraceae commonly coded also for tet(32) and tet(O). The tet(44) gene was associated with Erysipelotrichaceae and tet(Q) was detected in the genomes of Bacteroidaceae and Porphyromonadaceae. Without any bias we have shown that antibiotic resistance is quite common in gut commensals. However, a comparison of codon usage showed that the above-mentioned families represent the most common current reservoirs but probably not the original host of the detected resistances. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7870933/ /pubmed/33558560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Juricova, Helena Matiasovicova, Jitka Kubasova, Tereza Cejkova, Darina Rychlik, Ivan The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title | The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title_full | The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title_fullStr | The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title_full_unstemmed | The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title_short | The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
title_sort | distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juricovahelena thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT matiasovicovajitka thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT kubasovatereza thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT cejkovadarina thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT rychlikivan thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT juricovahelena distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT matiasovicovajitka distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT kubasovatereza distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT cejkovadarina distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals AT rychlikivan distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals |