Cargando…

The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals

Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juricova, Helena, Matiasovicova, Jitka, Kubasova, Tereza, Cejkova, Darina, Rychlik, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3
_version_ 1783648910130020352
author Juricova, Helena
Matiasovicova, Jitka
Kubasova, Tereza
Cejkova, Darina
Rychlik, Ivan
author_facet Juricova, Helena
Matiasovicova, Jitka
Kubasova, Tereza
Cejkova, Darina
Rychlik, Ivan
author_sort Juricova, Helena
collection PubMed
description Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiotic resistance genes among chicken gut microbiota members in 259 isolates with known whole genomic sequences. Altogether 124 isolates contained at least one gene coding for antibiotic resistance. Genes coding for the resistance to tetracyclines (detected in 101 isolates), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics (28 isolates) and aminoglycosides (25 isolates) were the most common. The most frequent tetracycline resistance genes were tet(W), tet(32), tet(O) and tet(Q). Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae frequently encoded tet(W). Lachnospiraceae commonly coded also for tet(32) and tet(O). The tet(44) gene was associated with Erysipelotrichaceae and tet(Q) was detected in the genomes of Bacteroidaceae and Porphyromonadaceae. Without any bias we have shown that antibiotic resistance is quite common in gut commensals. However, a comparison of codon usage showed that the above-mentioned families represent the most common current reservoirs but probably not the original host of the detected resistances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7870933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78709332021-02-10 The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals Juricova, Helena Matiasovicova, Jitka Kubasova, Tereza Cejkova, Darina Rychlik, Ivan Sci Rep Article Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens or several indicator bacteria is commonly studied but the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacterial commensals colonising the intestinal tract is essentially unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the presence of horizontally acquired antibiotic resistance genes among chicken gut microbiota members in 259 isolates with known whole genomic sequences. Altogether 124 isolates contained at least one gene coding for antibiotic resistance. Genes coding for the resistance to tetracyclines (detected in 101 isolates), macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics (28 isolates) and aminoglycosides (25 isolates) were the most common. The most frequent tetracycline resistance genes were tet(W), tet(32), tet(O) and tet(Q). Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae frequently encoded tet(W). Lachnospiraceae commonly coded also for tet(32) and tet(O). The tet(44) gene was associated with Erysipelotrichaceae and tet(Q) was detected in the genomes of Bacteroidaceae and Porphyromonadaceae. Without any bias we have shown that antibiotic resistance is quite common in gut commensals. However, a comparison of codon usage showed that the above-mentioned families represent the most common current reservoirs but probably not the original host of the detected resistances. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7870933/ /pubmed/33558560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Juricova, Helena
Matiasovicova, Jitka
Kubasova, Tereza
Cejkova, Darina
Rychlik, Ivan
The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title_full The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title_fullStr The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title_full_unstemmed The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title_short The distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
title_sort distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in chicken gut microbiota commensals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7870933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82640-3
work_keys_str_mv AT juricovahelena thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT matiasovicovajitka thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT kubasovatereza thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT cejkovadarina thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT rychlikivan thedistributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT juricovahelena distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT matiasovicovajitka distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT kubasovatereza distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT cejkovadarina distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals
AT rychlikivan distributionofantibioticresistancegenesinchickengutmicrobiotacommensals