Cargando…

Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in Wuhan, China, and led to a global epidemic. We aimed to compare the clinical and serological features of COVID-19 patients with positive and negative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Caiqin, Su, Qi, Liu, Jun, Chen, Lei, Li, Yuting, Tian, Xiaoli, Li, Weidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520972658
_version_ 1783648945432428544
author Li, Caiqin
Su, Qi
Liu, Jun
Chen, Lei
Li, Yuting
Tian, Xiaoli
Li, Weidong
author_facet Li, Caiqin
Su, Qi
Liu, Jun
Chen, Lei
Li, Yuting
Tian, Xiaoli
Li, Weidong
author_sort Li, Caiqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in Wuhan, China, and led to a global epidemic. We aimed to compare the clinical and serological features of COVID-19 patients with positive and negative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from 9 February to 4 April 2020. COVID-19 patients at Leishenshan Hospital in Wuhan, China (125 total cases; 87 RT-PCR positive and 38 RT-PCR negative) were included. COVID-19 serology was assessed by colloidal gold assay. All cases were analyzed for demographic, clinical, and serological features. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in most demographic features, clinical symptoms, complications or treatments of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients. Serum IgM/IgG was positive in 82 (94%) and 33 (87%) RT-PCR positive and negative cases, respectively. IgM was detectable as early as 3 days after symptom onset and was undetectable 60 days after symptom onset. By contrast, IgG could be detected only 10 days after symptom onset and reached its peak 60 days after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: Serological tests performed during the appropriate time window of disease progression could be valuable auxiliary methods to RT-PCR in COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78710882021-02-19 Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients Li, Caiqin Su, Qi Liu, Jun Chen, Lei Li, Yuting Tian, Xiaoli Li, Weidong J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report BACKGROUND: In December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in Wuhan, China, and led to a global epidemic. We aimed to compare the clinical and serological features of COVID-19 patients with positive and negative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from 9 February to 4 April 2020. COVID-19 patients at Leishenshan Hospital in Wuhan, China (125 total cases; 87 RT-PCR positive and 38 RT-PCR negative) were included. COVID-19 serology was assessed by colloidal gold assay. All cases were analyzed for demographic, clinical, and serological features. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in most demographic features, clinical symptoms, complications or treatments of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients. Serum IgM/IgG was positive in 82 (94%) and 33 (87%) RT-PCR positive and negative cases, respectively. IgM was detectable as early as 3 days after symptom onset and was undetectable 60 days after symptom onset. By contrast, IgG could be detected only 10 days after symptom onset and reached its peak 60 days after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: Serological tests performed during the appropriate time window of disease progression could be valuable auxiliary methods to RT-PCR in COVID-19 patients. SAGE Publications 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7871088/ /pubmed/33530774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520972658 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Li, Caiqin
Su, Qi
Liu, Jun
Chen, Lei
Li, Yuting
Tian, Xiaoli
Li, Weidong
Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title_full Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title_short Comparison of clinical and serological features of RT-PCR positive and negative COVID-19 patients
title_sort comparison of clinical and serological features of rt-pcr positive and negative covid-19 patients
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33530774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520972658
work_keys_str_mv AT licaiqin comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT suqi comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT liujun comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT chenlei comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT liyuting comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT tianxiaoli comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients
AT liweidong comparisonofclinicalandserologicalfeaturesofrtpcrpositiveandnegativecovid19patients