Cargando…

Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities

OBJECTIVES: While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chartier, Lucas B., Douglas, Stuart L., Tawadrous, Davy, Stang, Antonia S., Vaillancourt, Samuel, Nasser, Laila, Hrymak, Carmen, Calder, Lisa, Perry, Jeffrey J., McRae, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3
_version_ 1783648952227201024
author Chartier, Lucas B.
Douglas, Stuart L.
Tawadrous, Davy
Stang, Antonia S.
Vaillancourt, Samuel
Nasser, Laila
Hrymak, Carmen
Calder, Lisa
Perry, Jeffrey J.
McRae, Andrew
author_facet Chartier, Lucas B.
Douglas, Stuart L.
Tawadrous, Davy
Stang, Antonia S.
Vaillancourt, Samuel
Nasser, Laila
Hrymak, Carmen
Calder, Lisa
Perry, Jeffrey J.
McRae, Andrew
author_sort Chartier, Lucas B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. METHODS: An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. RESULTS: The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. CONCLUSION: Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78711282021-02-09 Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities Chartier, Lucas B. Douglas, Stuart L. Tawadrous, Davy Stang, Antonia S. Vaillancourt, Samuel Nasser, Laila Hrymak, Carmen Calder, Lisa Perry, Jeffrey J. McRae, Andrew CJEM CAEP Academic Symposium Paper OBJECTIVES: While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. METHODS: An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. RESULTS: The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. CONCLUSION: Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7871128/ /pubmed/33559866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle CAEP Academic Symposium Paper
Chartier, Lucas B.
Douglas, Stuart L.
Tawadrous, Davy
Stang, Antonia S.
Vaillancourt, Samuel
Nasser, Laila
Hrymak, Carmen
Calder, Lisa
Perry, Jeffrey J.
McRae, Andrew
Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title_full Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title_fullStr Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title_short Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
title_sort recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
topic CAEP Academic Symposium Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chartierlucasb recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT douglasstuartl recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT tawadrousdavy recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT stangantonias recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT vaillancourtsamuel recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT nasserlaila recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT hrymakcarmen recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT calderlisa recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT perryjeffreyj recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities
AT mcraeandrew recommendationsforenhancingcollaborationbetweenthecanadianemergencydepartmentqualityimprovementandresearchcommunities