Cargando…

Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have shown that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) applied immediately after extubation may prevent reintubation in patients at high-risk of extubation failure. However, most of studies included patients with chronic respiratory disorders as well as patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thille, Arnaud W., Coudroy, Rémi, Nay, Mai-Anh, Gacouin, Arnaud, Decavèle, Maxens, Sonneville, Romain, Beloncle, François, Girault, Christophe, Dangers, Laurence, Lautrette, Alexandre, Levrat, Quentin, Rouzé, Anahita, Vivier, Emmanuel, Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste, Ricard, Jean-Damien, Razazi, Keyvan, Barberet, Guillaume, Lebert, Christine, Ehrmann, Stephan, Massri, Alexandre, Bourenne, Jeremy, Pradel, Gael, Bailly, Pierre, Terzi, Nicolas, Dellamonica, Jean, Lacave, Guillaume, Robert, René, Ragot, Stéphanie, Frat, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00823-7
_version_ 1783648982340206592
author Thille, Arnaud W.
Coudroy, Rémi
Nay, Mai-Anh
Gacouin, Arnaud
Decavèle, Maxens
Sonneville, Romain
Beloncle, François
Girault, Christophe
Dangers, Laurence
Lautrette, Alexandre
Levrat, Quentin
Rouzé, Anahita
Vivier, Emmanuel
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste
Ricard, Jean-Damien
Razazi, Keyvan
Barberet, Guillaume
Lebert, Christine
Ehrmann, Stephan
Massri, Alexandre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Pradel, Gael
Bailly, Pierre
Terzi, Nicolas
Dellamonica, Jean
Lacave, Guillaume
Robert, René
Ragot, Stéphanie
Frat, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Thille, Arnaud W.
Coudroy, Rémi
Nay, Mai-Anh
Gacouin, Arnaud
Decavèle, Maxens
Sonneville, Romain
Beloncle, François
Girault, Christophe
Dangers, Laurence
Lautrette, Alexandre
Levrat, Quentin
Rouzé, Anahita
Vivier, Emmanuel
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste
Ricard, Jean-Damien
Razazi, Keyvan
Barberet, Guillaume
Lebert, Christine
Ehrmann, Stephan
Massri, Alexandre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Pradel, Gael
Bailly, Pierre
Terzi, Nicolas
Dellamonica, Jean
Lacave, Guillaume
Robert, René
Ragot, Stéphanie
Frat, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Thille, Arnaud W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have shown that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) applied immediately after extubation may prevent reintubation in patients at high-risk of extubation failure. However, most of studies included patients with chronic respiratory disorders as well as patients without underlying respiratory disease. To date, no study has shown decreased risk of reintubation with prophylactic NIV after extubation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that prophylactic NIV after extubation may decrease the risk of reintubation in COPD patients as compared with high-flow nasal oxygen. We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of COPD patients included in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing prophylactic use of NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone immediately after extubation. RESULTS: Among the 651 patients included in the original study, 150 (23%) had underlying COPD including 86 patients treated with NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen and 64 patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. The reintubation rate was 13% (11 out of 86 patients) with NIV and 27% (17 out of 64 patients) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference, − 14% (95% CI − 27% to − 1%); p = 0.03]. Whereas reintubation rates were significantly lower with NIV than with high-flow nasal oxygen alone at 72 h and until ICU discharge, mortality in ICU did not differ between groups: 6% (5/86) with NIV vs. 9% (6/64) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference − 4% (95% CI − 14% to 5%); p = 0.40]. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients, prophylactic NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen significantly decreased the risk of reintubation compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. Trial registration The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the trial registration number NCT03121482 (20 April 2017)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78713062021-02-09 Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial Thille, Arnaud W. Coudroy, Rémi Nay, Mai-Anh Gacouin, Arnaud Decavèle, Maxens Sonneville, Romain Beloncle, François Girault, Christophe Dangers, Laurence Lautrette, Alexandre Levrat, Quentin Rouzé, Anahita Vivier, Emmanuel Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste Ricard, Jean-Damien Razazi, Keyvan Barberet, Guillaume Lebert, Christine Ehrmann, Stephan Massri, Alexandre Bourenne, Jeremy Pradel, Gael Bailly, Pierre Terzi, Nicolas Dellamonica, Jean Lacave, Guillaume Robert, René Ragot, Stéphanie Frat, Jean-Pierre Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have shown that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) applied immediately after extubation may prevent reintubation in patients at high-risk of extubation failure. However, most of studies included patients with chronic respiratory disorders as well as patients without underlying respiratory disease. To date, no study has shown decreased risk of reintubation with prophylactic NIV after extubation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that prophylactic NIV after extubation may decrease the risk of reintubation in COPD patients as compared with high-flow nasal oxygen. We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of COPD patients included in a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing prophylactic use of NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone immediately after extubation. RESULTS: Among the 651 patients included in the original study, 150 (23%) had underlying COPD including 86 patients treated with NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen and 64 patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. The reintubation rate was 13% (11 out of 86 patients) with NIV and 27% (17 out of 64 patients) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference, − 14% (95% CI − 27% to − 1%); p = 0.03]. Whereas reintubation rates were significantly lower with NIV than with high-flow nasal oxygen alone at 72 h and until ICU discharge, mortality in ICU did not differ between groups: 6% (5/86) with NIV vs. 9% (6/64) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone [difference − 4% (95% CI − 14% to 5%); p = 0.40]. CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients, prophylactic NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen significantly decreased the risk of reintubation compared with high-flow nasal oxygen alone. Trial registration The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the trial registration number NCT03121482 (20 April 2017) Springer International Publishing 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7871306/ /pubmed/33559765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00823-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Thille, Arnaud W.
Coudroy, Rémi
Nay, Mai-Anh
Gacouin, Arnaud
Decavèle, Maxens
Sonneville, Romain
Beloncle, François
Girault, Christophe
Dangers, Laurence
Lautrette, Alexandre
Levrat, Quentin
Rouzé, Anahita
Vivier, Emmanuel
Lascarrou, Jean-Baptiste
Ricard, Jean-Damien
Razazi, Keyvan
Barberet, Guillaume
Lebert, Christine
Ehrmann, Stephan
Massri, Alexandre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Pradel, Gael
Bailly, Pierre
Terzi, Nicolas
Dellamonica, Jean
Lacave, Guillaume
Robert, René
Ragot, Stéphanie
Frat, Jean-Pierre
Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in COPD patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort non-invasive ventilation alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen versus high-flow nasal oxygen alone after extubation in copd patients: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00823-7
work_keys_str_mv AT thillearnaudw noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coudroyremi noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT naymaianh noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gacouinarnaud noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT decavelemaxens noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sonnevilleromain noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT belonclefrancois noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT giraultchristophe noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dangerslaurence noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lautrettealexandre noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT levratquentin noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rouzeanahita noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vivieremmanuel noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lascarroujeanbaptiste noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ricardjeandamien noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT razazikeyvan noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barberetguillaume noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lebertchristine noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ehrmannstephan noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT massrialexandre noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bourennejeremy noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pradelgael noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baillypierre noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT terzinicolas noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dellamonicajean noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lacaveguillaume noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robertrene noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ragotstephanie noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fratjeanpierre noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT noninvasiveventilationalternatingwithhighflownasaloxygenversushighflownasaloxygenaloneafterextubationincopdpatientsaposthocanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial