Cargando…

Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse

BACKGROUND: The reported mortality for sepsis and septic shock varies between 15% and 59% in international comparison. For Germany, the number of studies is limited. Previous estimations of mortality in Germany are outdated or based on claims data analyses. Various authors discuss whether lacking qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Michael, Groesdonk, Heinrich Volker, Preissing, Franziska, Dickmann, Petra, Vogelmann, Tobias, Gerlach, Herwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00917-8
_version_ 1783648983575429120
author Bauer, Michael
Groesdonk, Heinrich Volker
Preissing, Franziska
Dickmann, Petra
Vogelmann, Tobias
Gerlach, Herwig
author_facet Bauer, Michael
Groesdonk, Heinrich Volker
Preissing, Franziska
Dickmann, Petra
Vogelmann, Tobias
Gerlach, Herwig
author_sort Bauer, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reported mortality for sepsis and septic shock varies between 15% and 59% in international comparison. For Germany, the number of studies is limited. Previous estimations of mortality in Germany are outdated or based on claims data analyses. Various authors discuss whether lacking quality initiatives and treatment standards in Germany could cause higher mortality for sepsis. This contrasts with the internationally well-recognized performance of the German intensive care infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to estimate 30-day and 90-day mortality of patients with sepsis and patients with septic shock in Germany and to compare the mortality with that of other industrialized regions (Europe, North America). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search included interventional and observational studies published between 2009 and 2020 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library that analyzed adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock in Europe and North America. Studies with less than 20 patients were excluded. The 30-day and 90-day mortality for sepsis and septic shock were pooled separately for studies conducted in Germany, Europe (excluding Germany) and North America in a meta-analysis using a random effects model. Mortality over time was analyzed in a linear regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 134 studies were included. Of these, 15 studies were identified for the estimation of mortality in Germany, covering 10,434 patients, the number of patients per study ranged from 28 to 4183 patients. The 30-day mortality for sepsis was 26.50% (95% confidence interval, CI: 19.86–33.15%) in Germany, 23.85% (95% CI: 20.49–27.21%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 19.58% (95% CI: 14.03–25.14%) in North America. The 30-day mortality for septic shock was 30.48% (95% CI: 29.30–31.67%) in Germany, 34.57% (95% CI: 33.51–35.64%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 33.69% (95% CI: 31.51–35.86%) in North America. The 90-day mortality for septic shock was 38.78% (95% CI: 32.70–44.86%) in Germany, 41.90% (95% CI: 38.88–44.91%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 34.41% (95% CI: 25.66–43.16%) in North America. A comparable decreasing trend in sepsis 30-day mortality was observed in all considered regions since 2009. CONCLUSION: Our analysis does not support the notion that mortality related to sepsis and septic shock in Germany is higher in international comparison. A higher mortality would not be obvious either, since intensive care, for example also during the COVID-19 pandemic, is regarded as exemplary in Germany and the structural quality, such as the number of intensive care beds per 100,000 inhabitants, is high in international comparison. Nevertheless, deficits could also exist outside intensive care medicine. A comparison of international individual studies should take greater account of the structure of healthcare systems, the severity of disease and the limitations resulting from the data sources used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78713112021-02-09 Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse Bauer, Michael Groesdonk, Heinrich Volker Preissing, Franziska Dickmann, Petra Vogelmann, Tobias Gerlach, Herwig Anaesthesist Originalien BACKGROUND: The reported mortality for sepsis and septic shock varies between 15% and 59% in international comparison. For Germany, the number of studies is limited. Previous estimations of mortality in Germany are outdated or based on claims data analyses. Various authors discuss whether lacking quality initiatives and treatment standards in Germany could cause higher mortality for sepsis. This contrasts with the internationally well-recognized performance of the German intensive care infrastructure during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to estimate 30-day and 90-day mortality of patients with sepsis and patients with septic shock in Germany and to compare the mortality with that of other industrialized regions (Europe, North America). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search included interventional and observational studies published between 2009 and 2020 in PubMed and the Cochrane Library that analyzed adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock in Europe and North America. Studies with less than 20 patients were excluded. The 30-day and 90-day mortality for sepsis and septic shock were pooled separately for studies conducted in Germany, Europe (excluding Germany) and North America in a meta-analysis using a random effects model. Mortality over time was analyzed in a linear regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 134 studies were included. Of these, 15 studies were identified for the estimation of mortality in Germany, covering 10,434 patients, the number of patients per study ranged from 28 to 4183 patients. The 30-day mortality for sepsis was 26.50% (95% confidence interval, CI: 19.86–33.15%) in Germany, 23.85% (95% CI: 20.49–27.21%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 19.58% (95% CI: 14.03–25.14%) in North America. The 30-day mortality for septic shock was 30.48% (95% CI: 29.30–31.67%) in Germany, 34.57% (95% CI: 33.51–35.64%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 33.69% (95% CI: 31.51–35.86%) in North America. The 90-day mortality for septic shock was 38.78% (95% CI: 32.70–44.86%) in Germany, 41.90% (95% CI: 38.88–44.91%) in Europe (excluding Germany) and 34.41% (95% CI: 25.66–43.16%) in North America. A comparable decreasing trend in sepsis 30-day mortality was observed in all considered regions since 2009. CONCLUSION: Our analysis does not support the notion that mortality related to sepsis and septic shock in Germany is higher in international comparison. A higher mortality would not be obvious either, since intensive care, for example also during the COVID-19 pandemic, is regarded as exemplary in Germany and the structural quality, such as the number of intensive care beds per 100,000 inhabitants, is high in international comparison. Nevertheless, deficits could also exist outside intensive care medicine. A comparison of international individual studies should take greater account of the structure of healthcare systems, the severity of disease and the limitations resulting from the data sources used. Springer Medizin 2021-02-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7871311/ /pubmed/33559687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00917-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, korrigierte Publikation 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Bauer, Michael
Groesdonk, Heinrich Volker
Preissing, Franziska
Dickmann, Petra
Vogelmann, Tobias
Gerlach, Herwig
Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title_full Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title_fullStr Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title_full_unstemmed Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title_short Sterblichkeit bei Sepsis und septischem Schock in Deutschland. Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews mit Metaanalyse
title_sort sterblichkeit bei sepsis und septischem schock in deutschland. ergebnisse eines systematischen reviews mit metaanalyse
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00917-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bauermichael sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse
AT groesdonkheinrichvolker sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse
AT preissingfranziska sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse
AT dickmannpetra sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse
AT vogelmanntobias sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse
AT gerlachherwig sterblichkeitbeisepsisundseptischemschockindeutschlandergebnisseeinessystematischenreviewsmitmetaanalyse