Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients

OBJECTIVE: The rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) questionnaire comprises seven patient-important domains of disease impact (pain, function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, emotional well-being, physical well-being, coping). RAID was validated as a pooled-weighted score. Its seven individual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duarte, Catia, Santos, Eduardo José Ferreira, Ferreira, Ricardo J O, Kvien, Tore K, Dougados, Maxime, de Wit, Maarten, da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira, Gossec, Laure
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001539
_version_ 1783648989148610560
author Duarte, Catia
Santos, Eduardo José Ferreira
Ferreira, Ricardo J O
Kvien, Tore K
Dougados, Maxime
de Wit, Maarten
da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira
Gossec, Laure
author_facet Duarte, Catia
Santos, Eduardo José Ferreira
Ferreira, Ricardo J O
Kvien, Tore K
Dougados, Maxime
de Wit, Maarten
da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira
Gossec, Laure
author_sort Duarte, Catia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) questionnaire comprises seven patient-important domains of disease impact (pain, function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, emotional well-being, physical well-being, coping). RAID was validated as a pooled-weighted score. Its seven individual items separately could provide a valuable tool in clinical practice to guide interventions targeting the patient’s experience of the disease. The aim was to separately assess the psychometric properties of each of the seven numeric rating scale (NRS) of the RAID (RAID.7). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses of data from the cross-sectional RAID study and from the Rainbow study, an open-label 12-week trial of etanercept in patients with RA. Construct validity of each NRS was assessed cross-sectionally in the RAID data set by Spearman’s correlation with the respective external instrument of reference. Using the rainbow data set, we assessed reliability through intraclass correlation coefficient between the screening and the baseline visits and responsiveness (sensitivity to change) by standardised response mean between baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 671 patients with RA with features of established disease were analysed, 563 and 108 from RAID and Rainbow, respectively. The NRS correlated moderately to strongly with the respective external instrument of reference (r=0.62–0.81). Reliability ranged from 0.64 (0.51–0.74) (pain) to 0.83 (0.76–0.88) (sleep disturbance) and responsiveness from 0.93 (0.73–1.13) (sleep disturbance) to 1.34 (1.01–1.64) (pain). CONCLUSION: The separate use of the individual NRS of RAID (RAID.7) is valid, feasible, reliable and sensitive to change, representing an opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of disease impact with minimal questionnaire burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00768053.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78713402021-02-18 Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients Duarte, Catia Santos, Eduardo José Ferreira Ferreira, Ricardo J O Kvien, Tore K Dougados, Maxime de Wit, Maarten da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira Gossec, Laure RMD Open Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: The rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) questionnaire comprises seven patient-important domains of disease impact (pain, function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, emotional well-being, physical well-being, coping). RAID was validated as a pooled-weighted score. Its seven individual items separately could provide a valuable tool in clinical practice to guide interventions targeting the patient’s experience of the disease. The aim was to separately assess the psychometric properties of each of the seven numeric rating scale (NRS) of the RAID (RAID.7). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Post hoc analyses of data from the cross-sectional RAID study and from the Rainbow study, an open-label 12-week trial of etanercept in patients with RA. Construct validity of each NRS was assessed cross-sectionally in the RAID data set by Spearman’s correlation with the respective external instrument of reference. Using the rainbow data set, we assessed reliability through intraclass correlation coefficient between the screening and the baseline visits and responsiveness (sensitivity to change) by standardised response mean between baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 671 patients with RA with features of established disease were analysed, 563 and 108 from RAID and Rainbow, respectively. The NRS correlated moderately to strongly with the respective external instrument of reference (r=0.62–0.81). Reliability ranged from 0.64 (0.51–0.74) (pain) to 0.83 (0.76–0.88) (sleep disturbance) and responsiveness from 0.93 (0.73–1.13) (sleep disturbance) to 1.34 (1.01–1.64) (pain). CONCLUSION: The separate use of the individual NRS of RAID (RAID.7) is valid, feasible, reliable and sensitive to change, representing an opportunity to improve the assessment and treatment of disease impact with minimal questionnaire burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00768053. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7871340/ /pubmed/33547229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001539 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rheumatoid Arthritis
Duarte, Catia
Santos, Eduardo José Ferreira
Ferreira, Ricardo J O
Kvien, Tore K
Dougados, Maxime
de Wit, Maarten
da Silva, Jose Antonio Pereira
Gossec, Laure
Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title_full Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title_short Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
title_sort validity and reliability of the eular instrument raid.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients
topic Rheumatoid Arthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001539
work_keys_str_mv AT duartecatia validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT santoseduardojoseferreira validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT ferreiraricardojo validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT kvientorek validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT dougadosmaxime validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT dewitmaarten validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT dasilvajoseantoniopereira validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients
AT gosseclaure validityandreliabilityoftheeularinstrumentraid7asatooltoassessindividualdomainsofimpactofdiseaseinrheumatoidarthritisacrosssectionalstudyof671patients