Cargando…
Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017 |
_version_ | 1783648991473303552 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Guoqiang Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Xingrao Lv, Chunyan Zeng, Guilin Xue, Zhihong Cao, Ruixue Zhang, Nan Xiong, Wei Huang, Qin |
author_facet | Xu, Guoqiang Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Xingrao Lv, Chunyan Zeng, Guilin Xue, Zhihong Cao, Ruixue Zhang, Nan Xiong, Wei Huang, Qin |
author_sort | Xu, Guoqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to illustrate their advantages and disadvantages in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We thoroughly searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and then merged the effect indicators of hazard ratios and risk ratios using RevMan 5.1. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials totaling 2,319 patients were included in our research. The synthesized results showed that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80, P < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80, P < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.68 95%, CI: 0.54-0.86, P = 0.001) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. It also increased the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the incidence of leukopenia and mucositis was similar in induction chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed better survival outcomes with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the triweekly cisplatin subgroup (all P < 0.01), whereas induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy could only improve progression-free survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival in the weekly cisplatin subgroup (HR = 0.78, P = 0.02; and HR = 0.66, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For the weekly cisplatin regimen subgroup, it did not improve remote control or overall survival versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, warranting further clarification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7871351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78713512021-02-19 Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Xu, Guoqiang Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Xingrao Lv, Chunyan Zeng, Guilin Xue, Zhihong Cao, Ruixue Zhang, Nan Xiong, Wei Huang, Qin Technol Cancer Res Treat Meta-Analysis PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to illustrate their advantages and disadvantages in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We thoroughly searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and then merged the effect indicators of hazard ratios and risk ratios using RevMan 5.1. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials totaling 2,319 patients were included in our research. The synthesized results showed that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80, P < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80, P < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.68 95%, CI: 0.54-0.86, P = 0.001) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. It also increased the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the incidence of leukopenia and mucositis was similar in induction chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed better survival outcomes with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the triweekly cisplatin subgroup (all P < 0.01), whereas induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy could only improve progression-free survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival in the weekly cisplatin subgroup (HR = 0.78, P = 0.02; and HR = 0.66, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For the weekly cisplatin regimen subgroup, it did not improve remote control or overall survival versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, warranting further clarification. SAGE Publications 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7871351/ /pubmed/33511908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Xu, Guoqiang Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Xingrao Lv, Chunyan Zeng, Guilin Xue, Zhihong Cao, Ruixue Zhang, Nan Xiong, Wei Huang, Qin Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title | Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent
Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title_full | Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent
Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent
Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent
Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title_short | Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent
Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent
chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced
nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuguoqiang comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT wangqiaoli comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT wuxingrao comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT lvchunyan comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zengguilin comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xuezhihong comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT caoruixue comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zhangnan comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xiongwei comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huangqin comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma |