Cargando…

Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Guoqiang, Wang, Qiaoli, Wu, Xingrao, Lv, Chunyan, Zeng, Guilin, Xue, Zhihong, Cao, Ruixue, Zhang, Nan, Xiong, Wei, Huang, Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017
_version_ 1783648991473303552
author Xu, Guoqiang
Wang, Qiaoli
Wu, Xingrao
Lv, Chunyan
Zeng, Guilin
Xue, Zhihong
Cao, Ruixue
Zhang, Nan
Xiong, Wei
Huang, Qin
author_facet Xu, Guoqiang
Wang, Qiaoli
Wu, Xingrao
Lv, Chunyan
Zeng, Guilin
Xue, Zhihong
Cao, Ruixue
Zhang, Nan
Xiong, Wei
Huang, Qin
author_sort Xu, Guoqiang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to illustrate their advantages and disadvantages in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We thoroughly searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and then merged the effect indicators of hazard ratios and risk ratios using RevMan 5.1. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials totaling 2,319 patients were included in our research. The synthesized results showed that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80, P < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80, P < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.68 95%, CI: 0.54-0.86, P = 0.001) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. It also increased the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the incidence of leukopenia and mucositis was similar in induction chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed better survival outcomes with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the triweekly cisplatin subgroup (all P < 0.01), whereas induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy could only improve progression-free survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival in the weekly cisplatin subgroup (HR = 0.78, P = 0.02; and HR = 0.66, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For the weekly cisplatin regimen subgroup, it did not improve remote control or overall survival versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, warranting further clarification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78713512021-02-19 Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Xu, Guoqiang Wang, Qiaoli Wu, Xingrao Lv, Chunyan Zeng, Guilin Xue, Zhihong Cao, Ruixue Zhang, Nan Xiong, Wei Huang, Qin Technol Cancer Res Treat Meta-Analysis PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to illustrate their advantages and disadvantages in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We thoroughly searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and then merged the effect indicators of hazard ratios and risk ratios using RevMan 5.1. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials totaling 2,319 patients were included in our research. The synthesized results showed that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, P = 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80, P < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80, P < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.68 95%, CI: 0.54-0.86, P = 0.001) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. It also increased the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the incidence of leukopenia and mucositis was similar in induction chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed better survival outcomes with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the triweekly cisplatin subgroup (all P < 0.01), whereas induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy could only improve progression-free survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival in the weekly cisplatin subgroup (HR = 0.78, P = 0.02; and HR = 0.66, P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For the weekly cisplatin regimen subgroup, it did not improve remote control or overall survival versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, warranting further clarification. SAGE Publications 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7871351/ /pubmed/33511908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Xu, Guoqiang
Wang, Qiaoli
Wu, Xingrao
Lv, Chunyan
Zeng, Guilin
Xue, Zhihong
Cao, Ruixue
Zhang, Nan
Xiong, Wei
Huang, Qin
Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_short Comparison of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_sort comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033821990017
work_keys_str_mv AT xuguoqiang comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wangqiaoli comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT wuxingrao comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT lvchunyan comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT zengguilin comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT xuezhihong comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT caoruixue comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT zhangnan comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT xiongwei comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT huangqin comparisonofinductionchemotherapyplusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyandconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma