Cargando…

The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets

BACKGROUND: Offering financial incentives promotes increases in fruit and vegetable purchases in farmers’ markets and supermarkets. Yet, little is understood about whether food-insecure adults purchase more fruits and vegetables as a result of receiving financial incentives in mobile produce market...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rummo, Pasquale E., Lyerly, Reece, Rose, Jennifer, Malyuta, Yelena, Cohen, Eliza Dexter, Nunn, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01093-z
_version_ 1783649002352279552
author Rummo, Pasquale E.
Lyerly, Reece
Rose, Jennifer
Malyuta, Yelena
Cohen, Eliza Dexter
Nunn, Amy
author_facet Rummo, Pasquale E.
Lyerly, Reece
Rose, Jennifer
Malyuta, Yelena
Cohen, Eliza Dexter
Nunn, Amy
author_sort Rummo, Pasquale E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Offering financial incentives promotes increases in fruit and vegetable purchases in farmers’ markets and supermarkets. Yet, little is understood about whether food-insecure adults purchase more fruits and vegetables as a result of receiving financial incentives in mobile produce market settings. METHODS: In 2018–2019, Food on the Move provided a 50% discount to customers using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase fruit and vegetables from 16 market locations in Rhode Island (n = 412 market occasions). We used mixed multivariable linear regression to estimate the difference in total dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP transactions and non-SNAP transactions. We also estimated the difference in out-of-pocket dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP and non-SNAP transactions, less the 50% discount. This reflects the actual amount spent on fresh fruits and vegetables purchased per visit. In both models, we controlled for the number of market sites per month, with fixed effects for quarter and year. We estimated random intercept variance for date of transaction and market site to adjust for clustering. RESULTS: In 2018–2019, the majority of market transactions (total n = 13,165) were SNAP transactions [n = 7.988 (63.0%)]. On average, customers spent $17.38 (SD = 16.69) on fruits and vegetables per transaction per month. However, customers using SNAP benefits spent significantly more on FVs per transaction per month [$22.01 (SD = 17.97)] compared to those who did not use SNAP benefits [9.81 (SD = 10.68)] (β = $10.88; 95% CI: 10.18, 11.58). Similarly, out-of-pocket dollar sales per SNAP transaction per month (i.e., less the 50% discount) were significantly higher [$11.42 (SD = 9.44)] relative to non-SNAP transactions [$9.40 (SD = 9.33)] (β = $1.85; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives contributed to higher fruit and vegetable purchases among low-income customers who shop at mobile produce markets by making produce more affordable. Higher spending on fruits and vegetables may promote healthy diet behaviors and reduce chronic disease risk among food-insecure adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78714042021-02-09 The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets Rummo, Pasquale E. Lyerly, Reece Rose, Jennifer Malyuta, Yelena Cohen, Eliza Dexter Nunn, Amy Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Offering financial incentives promotes increases in fruit and vegetable purchases in farmers’ markets and supermarkets. Yet, little is understood about whether food-insecure adults purchase more fruits and vegetables as a result of receiving financial incentives in mobile produce market settings. METHODS: In 2018–2019, Food on the Move provided a 50% discount to customers using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase fruit and vegetables from 16 market locations in Rhode Island (n = 412 market occasions). We used mixed multivariable linear regression to estimate the difference in total dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP transactions and non-SNAP transactions. We also estimated the difference in out-of-pocket dollar sales per transaction per month between SNAP and non-SNAP transactions, less the 50% discount. This reflects the actual amount spent on fresh fruits and vegetables purchased per visit. In both models, we controlled for the number of market sites per month, with fixed effects for quarter and year. We estimated random intercept variance for date of transaction and market site to adjust for clustering. RESULTS: In 2018–2019, the majority of market transactions (total n = 13,165) were SNAP transactions [n = 7.988 (63.0%)]. On average, customers spent $17.38 (SD = 16.69) on fruits and vegetables per transaction per month. However, customers using SNAP benefits spent significantly more on FVs per transaction per month [$22.01 (SD = 17.97)] compared to those who did not use SNAP benefits [9.81 (SD = 10.68)] (β = $10.88; 95% CI: 10.18, 11.58). Similarly, out-of-pocket dollar sales per SNAP transaction per month (i.e., less the 50% discount) were significantly higher [$11.42 (SD = 9.44)] relative to non-SNAP transactions [$9.40 (SD = 9.33)] (β = $1.85; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives contributed to higher fruit and vegetable purchases among low-income customers who shop at mobile produce markets by making produce more affordable. Higher spending on fruits and vegetables may promote healthy diet behaviors and reduce chronic disease risk among food-insecure adults. BioMed Central 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7871404/ /pubmed/33557852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01093-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rummo, Pasquale E.
Lyerly, Reece
Rose, Jennifer
Malyuta, Yelena
Cohen, Eliza Dexter
Nunn, Amy
The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title_full The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title_fullStr The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title_full_unstemmed The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title_short The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets
title_sort impact of financial incentives on snap transactions at mobile produce markets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01093-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rummopasqualee theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT lyerlyreece theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT rosejennifer theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT malyutayelena theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT cohenelizadexter theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT nunnamy theimpactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT rummopasqualee impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT lyerlyreece impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT rosejennifer impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT malyutayelena impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT cohenelizadexter impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets
AT nunnamy impactoffinancialincentivesonsnaptransactionsatmobileproducemarkets