Cargando…

Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US

We present a dataset covering the extent of local mask orders between April and August 2020, in states which did not have statewide orders (and hence 100% coverage).  We obtained data from national and regional newspaper and broadcaster web-based articles, and city and county web pages. The informat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Philip, Ohinmaa, Arvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604027
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26967.1
_version_ 1783649004489277440
author Jacobs, Philip
Ohinmaa, Arvi
author_facet Jacobs, Philip
Ohinmaa, Arvi
author_sort Jacobs, Philip
collection PubMed
description We present a dataset covering the extent of local mask orders between April and August 2020, in states which did not have statewide orders (and hence 100% coverage).  We obtained data from national and regional newspaper and broadcaster web-based articles, and city and county web pages. The information that we abstracted included: city or county of ordinance, date that the ordinance took effect, and the population of the city or county. In 14 states, city or county governments issued mask-wearing orders, and from our dataset it can been seen that the median population covered in the states was 37.5%; the coverage ranged from 1.6% (New Hampshire) to 77.1% (Arizona).  The dataset can be accessed from: https://doi.org/10.7939/DVN/A9C1UU
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78714142021-02-17 Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US Jacobs, Philip Ohinmaa, Arvi F1000Res Data Note We present a dataset covering the extent of local mask orders between April and August 2020, in states which did not have statewide orders (and hence 100% coverage).  We obtained data from national and regional newspaper and broadcaster web-based articles, and city and county web pages. The information that we abstracted included: city or county of ordinance, date that the ordinance took effect, and the population of the city or county. In 14 states, city or county governments issued mask-wearing orders, and from our dataset it can been seen that the median population covered in the states was 37.5%; the coverage ranged from 1.6% (New Hampshire) to 77.1% (Arizona).  The dataset can be accessed from: https://doi.org/10.7939/DVN/A9C1UU F1000 Research Limited 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7871414/ /pubmed/33604027 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26967.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Jacobs P and Ohinmaa A http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Note
Jacobs, Philip
Ohinmaa, Arvi
Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title_full Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title_fullStr Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title_full_unstemmed Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title_short Dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the US
title_sort dataset: percent of population covered by local government mask orders in the us
topic Data Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604027
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26967.1
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsphilip datasetpercentofpopulationcoveredbylocalgovernmentmaskordersintheus
AT ohinmaaarvi datasetpercentofpopulationcoveredbylocalgovernmentmaskordersintheus