Cargando…

A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly

BACKGROUND: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is an effective surgical approach for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, no studies of prognosis, especially the recovery of the soft tissue, have reported using BDUA in an elderly population. The aims of these research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yifan, Chen, Jian, Gao, Peng, Gu, Changjiang, Fan, Jin, Hu, Zhiyi, Cao, Xiaojian, Yin, Guoyong, Zhou, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04026-w
_version_ 1783649027762421760
author Huang, Yifan
Chen, Jian
Gao, Peng
Gu, Changjiang
Fan, Jin
Hu, Zhiyi
Cao, Xiaojian
Yin, Guoyong
Zhou, Wei
author_facet Huang, Yifan
Chen, Jian
Gao, Peng
Gu, Changjiang
Fan, Jin
Hu, Zhiyi
Cao, Xiaojian
Yin, Guoyong
Zhou, Wei
author_sort Huang, Yifan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is an effective surgical approach for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, no studies of prognosis, especially the recovery of the soft tissue, have reported using BDUA in an elderly population. The aims of these research were to investigate the early efficacy of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the patients over 65 years of age, especially in the perioperative factors and the recovery of the soft tissue. METHODS: The clinical data from 61 aging patients with lumbar degenerative disease who received surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. 31 cases who received the lumbar interbody fusion surgery with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) were compared with 30 cases who received conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The radiographic parameters were measured using X-ray including lumbar lordosis angle and fusion rate. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at different time points. Fatty degeneration ratio and area of muscle/vertebral body were used to detect recovery of soft tissue. RESULTS: The BDUA approach group was found to have significantly less intraoperative blood loss(p < 0.05) and postoperative drainage(p < 0.05) compared to conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group. Symptoms of spinal canal stenosis and nerve compression were significantly relieved postoperatively, as compared with the preoperative state. However, the opposite side had a lower rate of fatty degeneration (9.42 ± 3.17%) comparing to decompression side (11.68 ± 3.08%) (P < 0.05) six months after surgery in the BDUA group. While there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in two sides of conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach group six months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is able to reduce the intraoperative and postoperative body fluid loss in the elderly. The opposite side of decompression in BDUA shows less fatty degeneration in 6 months, which indicates better recovery of the soft tissue of the aging patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78715432021-02-09 A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly Huang, Yifan Chen, Jian Gao, Peng Gu, Changjiang Fan, Jin Hu, Zhiyi Cao, Xiaojian Yin, Guoyong Zhou, Wei BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is an effective surgical approach for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, no studies of prognosis, especially the recovery of the soft tissue, have reported using BDUA in an elderly population. The aims of these research were to investigate the early efficacy of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the patients over 65 years of age, especially in the perioperative factors and the recovery of the soft tissue. METHODS: The clinical data from 61 aging patients with lumbar degenerative disease who received surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. 31 cases who received the lumbar interbody fusion surgery with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) were compared with 30 cases who received conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The radiographic parameters were measured using X-ray including lumbar lordosis angle and fusion rate. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at different time points. Fatty degeneration ratio and area of muscle/vertebral body were used to detect recovery of soft tissue. RESULTS: The BDUA approach group was found to have significantly less intraoperative blood loss(p < 0.05) and postoperative drainage(p < 0.05) compared to conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group. Symptoms of spinal canal stenosis and nerve compression were significantly relieved postoperatively, as compared with the preoperative state. However, the opposite side had a lower rate of fatty degeneration (9.42 ± 3.17%) comparing to decompression side (11.68 ± 3.08%) (P < 0.05) six months after surgery in the BDUA group. While there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in two sides of conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach group six months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is able to reduce the intraoperative and postoperative body fluid loss in the elderly. The opposite side of decompression in BDUA shows less fatty degeneration in 6 months, which indicates better recovery of the soft tissue of the aging patients. BioMed Central 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7871543/ /pubmed/33557804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04026-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Yifan
Chen, Jian
Gao, Peng
Gu, Changjiang
Fan, Jin
Hu, Zhiyi
Cao, Xiaojian
Yin, Guoyong
Zhou, Wei
A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title_full A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title_fullStr A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title_short A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
title_sort comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04026-w
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyifan acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT chenjian acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT gaopeng acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT guchangjiang acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT fanjin acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT huzhiyi acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT caoxiaojian acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT yinguoyong acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT zhouwei acomparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT huangyifan comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT chenjian comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT gaopeng comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT guchangjiang comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT fanjin comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT huzhiyi comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT caoxiaojian comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT yinguoyong comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly
AT zhouwei comparisonofthebilateraldecompressionviaunilateralapproachversusconventionalapproachtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforthetreatmentoflumbardegenerativediscdiseaseintheelderly