Cargando…
Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3 |
_version_ | 1783649043421855744 |
---|---|
author | Eftedal, Monica Tveito, Torill H. Gensby, Ulrik Islam, M. Kamrul Lie, Stein Atle Aasland, Gro Kostveit, Svein Jensen, Chris |
author_facet | Eftedal, Monica Tveito, Torill H. Gensby, Ulrik Islam, M. Kamrul Lie, Stein Atle Aasland, Gro Kostveit, Svein Jensen, Chris |
author_sort | Eftedal, Monica |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants’ RTW processes. METHODS/DESIGN: We will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18–60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN12033424, 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7871619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78716192021-02-09 Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol Eftedal, Monica Tveito, Torill H. Gensby, Ulrik Islam, M. Kamrul Lie, Stein Atle Aasland, Gro Kostveit, Svein Jensen, Chris BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants’ RTW processes. METHODS/DESIGN: We will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18–60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN12033424, 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7871619/ /pubmed/33563250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Eftedal, Monica Tveito, Torill H. Gensby, Ulrik Islam, M. Kamrul Lie, Stein Atle Aasland, Gro Kostveit, Svein Jensen, Chris Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title | Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title_full | Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title_fullStr | Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title_short | Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
title_sort | comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eftedalmonica comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT tveitotorillh comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT gensbyulrik comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT islammkamrul comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT liesteinatle comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT aaslandgro comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT kostveitsvein comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol AT jensenchris comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol |