Cargando…

Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eftedal, Monica, Tveito, Torill H., Gensby, Ulrik, Islam, M. Kamrul, Lie, Stein Atle, Aasland, Gro, Kostveit, Svein, Jensen, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3
_version_ 1783649043421855744
author Eftedal, Monica
Tveito, Torill H.
Gensby, Ulrik
Islam, M. Kamrul
Lie, Stein Atle
Aasland, Gro
Kostveit, Svein
Jensen, Chris
author_facet Eftedal, Monica
Tveito, Torill H.
Gensby, Ulrik
Islam, M. Kamrul
Lie, Stein Atle
Aasland, Gro
Kostveit, Svein
Jensen, Chris
author_sort Eftedal, Monica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants’ RTW processes. METHODS/DESIGN: We will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18–60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN12033424, 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78716192021-02-09 Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol Eftedal, Monica Tveito, Torill H. Gensby, Ulrik Islam, M. Kamrul Lie, Stein Atle Aasland, Gro Kostveit, Svein Jensen, Chris BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs) are the most frequent reasons for long-term sick leave and work disability. Occupational rehabilitation programs are used to help employees return to work (RTW). However, knowledge regarding the effect of these programs is scarce, and even less is known about which programs are best suited for which patients. This study aims to compare the RTW results of two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs in Norway, as well as to examine the delivery and reception of the two programs and explore the active mechanisms of the participants’ RTW processes. METHODS/DESIGN: We will use a mixed-method convergent design to study the main outcome. Approximately 600 participants will be included in the study. Eligible study participants will be aged 18–60 years old and have been on sick leave due to MSDs, CMDs, or both for at least 6 weeks. Interdisciplinary teams at both participating clinics will deliver complex occupational rehabilitation programs. The inpatient rehabilitation program has a duration of 4 weeks and is full time. The outpatient program has a duration of 3 months and involves weekly sessions. The primary outcome is RTW. Secondary outcomes are differences in the incremental cost for an averted sick leave day, cost utility/benefit, and differences between the programs regarding improvements in known modifiable obstacles to RTW. Subgroup analyses are planned. The researchers will be blinded to the intervention groups when analyzing the quantitative RTW data. DISCUSSION: This study aims to provide new insights regarding occupational rehabilitation interventions, treatment targets, and outcomes for different subgroups of sick-listed employees and to inform discussions on the active working mechanisms of occupational rehabilitation and the influence of context in the return-to-work process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN12033424, 15.10.2014, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7871619/ /pubmed/33563250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Eftedal, Monica
Tveito, Torill H.
Gensby, Ulrik
Islam, M. Kamrul
Lie, Stein Atle
Aasland, Gro
Kostveit, Svein
Jensen, Chris
Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title_full Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title_fullStr Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title_short Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
title_sort comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eftedalmonica comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT tveitotorillh comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT gensbyulrik comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT islammkamrul comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT liesteinatle comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT aaslandgro comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT kostveitsvein comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol
AT jensenchris comparingtwointerdisciplinaryoccupationalrehabilitationprogramsforemployeesonsickleaveamixedmethoddesignstudyprotocol