Cargando…

Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND: We explored whether the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be characterized by incorporating a composite of duration of response (DOR) to complement traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for objective response rate (ORR) in an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelleher, Thomas, Cai, Junliang, Botwood, Nicholas AJ, Labriola, Dominic F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001177
_version_ 1783649061174247424
author Kelleher, Thomas
Cai, Junliang
Botwood, Nicholas AJ
Labriola, Dominic F
author_facet Kelleher, Thomas
Cai, Junliang
Botwood, Nicholas AJ
Labriola, Dominic F
author_sort Kelleher, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We explored whether the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be characterized by incorporating a composite of duration of response (DOR) to complement traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for objective response rate (ORR) in an intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Furthermore, the correlation of this novel endpoint, characterized by the restricted mean time in response (RMTR), with overall survival (OS) will be examined. METHODS: We analyzed ORR alone or in combination with DOR (RMTR) in available phase I, II, and III trials evaluating nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab across solid tumor types. ORR was evaluated per RECIST V.1.1. DOR was estimated using individual patient data in ITT populations regardless of RECIST response, with non-responders imputed as zero. Associations between ORR alone or RMTR and OS were evaluated in the ITT population. DOR curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and 6-month RMTR, a measure of response durability, was derived from the area under the curves. For ORR and RMTR in the ITT population, the strength of association with OS was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). RESULTS: Nivolumab treatment was associated with longer response durations than active control in responder and ITT populations. Similarly, ORR and RMTR were both significantly correlated with OS (ORR vs OS: r=0.684, p=0.02; RMTR vs OS: r=0.695, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Combining ORR and DOR (RMTR) to objectively characterize tumor shrinkage in an ITT patient population is a novel approach that appears to correlate well with OS in patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab. This endpoint may provide a more complete characterization of tumor shrinkage to incorporate into the design of future ICI clinical trials. However, confirmation of this approach will require further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78716972021-02-18 Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors Kelleher, Thomas Cai, Junliang Botwood, Nicholas AJ Labriola, Dominic F J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: We explored whether the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be characterized by incorporating a composite of duration of response (DOR) to complement traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for objective response rate (ORR) in an intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Furthermore, the correlation of this novel endpoint, characterized by the restricted mean time in response (RMTR), with overall survival (OS) will be examined. METHODS: We analyzed ORR alone or in combination with DOR (RMTR) in available phase I, II, and III trials evaluating nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab across solid tumor types. ORR was evaluated per RECIST V.1.1. DOR was estimated using individual patient data in ITT populations regardless of RECIST response, with non-responders imputed as zero. Associations between ORR alone or RMTR and OS were evaluated in the ITT population. DOR curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and 6-month RMTR, a measure of response durability, was derived from the area under the curves. For ORR and RMTR in the ITT population, the strength of association with OS was analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients (r). RESULTS: Nivolumab treatment was associated with longer response durations than active control in responder and ITT populations. Similarly, ORR and RMTR were both significantly correlated with OS (ORR vs OS: r=0.684, p=0.02; RMTR vs OS: r=0.695, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Combining ORR and DOR (RMTR) to objectively characterize tumor shrinkage in an ITT patient population is a novel approach that appears to correlate well with OS in patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab. This endpoint may provide a more complete characterization of tumor shrinkage to incorporate into the design of future ICI clinical trials. However, confirmation of this approach will require further research. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7871697/ /pubmed/33558277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001177 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
Kelleher, Thomas
Cai, Junliang
Botwood, Nicholas AJ
Labriola, Dominic F
Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_fullStr Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_short Characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_sort characterizing tumor shrinkage as a measure of clinical benefit for immune checkpoint inhibitors
topic Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33558277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001177
work_keys_str_mv AT kelleherthomas characterizingtumorshrinkageasameasureofclinicalbenefitforimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT caijunliang characterizingtumorshrinkageasameasureofclinicalbenefitforimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT botwoodnicholasaj characterizingtumorshrinkageasameasureofclinicalbenefitforimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT labrioladominicf characterizingtumorshrinkageasameasureofclinicalbenefitforimmunecheckpointinhibitors