Cargando…

Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities

OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sejbaek, Tobias, Mendoza, Jason P, Penner, Natasha, Madsen, Jonna Skov, Olsen, Dorte Aalund, Illes, Zsolt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063
_version_ 1783649065546809344
author Sejbaek, Tobias
Mendoza, Jason P
Penner, Natasha
Madsen, Jonna Skov
Olsen, Dorte Aalund
Illes, Zsolt
author_facet Sejbaek, Tobias
Mendoza, Jason P
Penner, Natasha
Madsen, Jonna Skov
Olsen, Dorte Aalund
Illes, Zsolt
author_sort Sejbaek, Tobias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HCs) were analysed by Simoa (Quanterix) for levels of NFL providing a total of 165 CSF samples (119 from MS) and 225 plasma samples (180 from MS). RESULTS: CSF and plasma concentrations highly correlated between NFL laboratory facilities (R: 0.92 and 0.84, <0.0001, respectively), and there were no differences between facilities. A bias between the two sites for plasma was −0.95 pg/mL and for CSF −73.53 pg/mL. The cut-offs for CSF were 807.5 and 571.0 pg/mL at site 1 and site 2, respectively; the cut-offs for plasma were 13.0 and 11.8 pg/mL, respectively. Seven out of 180 plasma samples (3.9%) and 3 out of 119 CSF samples (2.5%) from MS patients could be reclassified as normal/abnormal, that is, below/above cut-off, when measured at different facilities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that results of NFL in CSF and blood measured with SIMOA are comparable between facilities. Nevertheless, healthcare practitioners should consider reference values at different laboratories, since different sensitivity/specificity can affect interpretation when low values are adjacent to cut-offs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7871722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78717222021-03-04 Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities Sejbaek, Tobias Mendoza, Jason P Penner, Natasha Madsen, Jonna Skov Olsen, Dorte Aalund Illes, Zsolt BMJ Neurol Open Short Report OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HCs) were analysed by Simoa (Quanterix) for levels of NFL providing a total of 165 CSF samples (119 from MS) and 225 plasma samples (180 from MS). RESULTS: CSF and plasma concentrations highly correlated between NFL laboratory facilities (R: 0.92 and 0.84, <0.0001, respectively), and there were no differences between facilities. A bias between the two sites for plasma was −0.95 pg/mL and for CSF −73.53 pg/mL. The cut-offs for CSF were 807.5 and 571.0 pg/mL at site 1 and site 2, respectively; the cut-offs for plasma were 13.0 and 11.8 pg/mL, respectively. Seven out of 180 plasma samples (3.9%) and 3 out of 119 CSF samples (2.5%) from MS patients could be reclassified as normal/abnormal, that is, below/above cut-off, when measured at different facilities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that results of NFL in CSF and blood measured with SIMOA are comparable between facilities. Nevertheless, healthcare practitioners should consider reference values at different laboratories, since different sensitivity/specificity can affect interpretation when low values are adjacent to cut-offs. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7871722/ /pubmed/33681796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Report
Sejbaek, Tobias
Mendoza, Jason P
Penner, Natasha
Madsen, Jonna Skov
Olsen, Dorte Aalund
Illes, Zsolt
Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title_full Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title_fullStr Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title_short Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
title_sort comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063
work_keys_str_mv AT sejbaektobias comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities
AT mendozajasonp comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities
AT pennernatasha comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities
AT madsenjonnaskov comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities
AT olsendorteaalund comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities
AT illeszsolt comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities