Cargando…
Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities
OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063 |
_version_ | 1783649065546809344 |
---|---|
author | Sejbaek, Tobias Mendoza, Jason P Penner, Natasha Madsen, Jonna Skov Olsen, Dorte Aalund Illes, Zsolt |
author_facet | Sejbaek, Tobias Mendoza, Jason P Penner, Natasha Madsen, Jonna Skov Olsen, Dorte Aalund Illes, Zsolt |
author_sort | Sejbaek, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HCs) were analysed by Simoa (Quanterix) for levels of NFL providing a total of 165 CSF samples (119 from MS) and 225 plasma samples (180 from MS). RESULTS: CSF and plasma concentrations highly correlated between NFL laboratory facilities (R: 0.92 and 0.84, <0.0001, respectively), and there were no differences between facilities. A bias between the two sites for plasma was −0.95 pg/mL and for CSF −73.53 pg/mL. The cut-offs for CSF were 807.5 and 571.0 pg/mL at site 1 and site 2, respectively; the cut-offs for plasma were 13.0 and 11.8 pg/mL, respectively. Seven out of 180 plasma samples (3.9%) and 3 out of 119 CSF samples (2.5%) from MS patients could be reclassified as normal/abnormal, that is, below/above cut-off, when measured at different facilities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that results of NFL in CSF and blood measured with SIMOA are comparable between facilities. Nevertheless, healthcare practitioners should consider reference values at different laboratories, since different sensitivity/specificity can affect interpretation when low values are adjacent to cut-offs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7871722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78717222021-03-04 Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities Sejbaek, Tobias Mendoza, Jason P Penner, Natasha Madsen, Jonna Skov Olsen, Dorte Aalund Illes, Zsolt BMJ Neurol Open Short Report OBJECTIVES: To examine levels of neurofilament light chain (NFL) in identical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood samples at two different facilities, and how differences affect interpretation of levels within and above the normal range. METHODS: CSF and plasma from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls (HCs) were analysed by Simoa (Quanterix) for levels of NFL providing a total of 165 CSF samples (119 from MS) and 225 plasma samples (180 from MS). RESULTS: CSF and plasma concentrations highly correlated between NFL laboratory facilities (R: 0.92 and 0.84, <0.0001, respectively), and there were no differences between facilities. A bias between the two sites for plasma was −0.95 pg/mL and for CSF −73.53 pg/mL. The cut-offs for CSF were 807.5 and 571.0 pg/mL at site 1 and site 2, respectively; the cut-offs for plasma were 13.0 and 11.8 pg/mL, respectively. Seven out of 180 plasma samples (3.9%) and 3 out of 119 CSF samples (2.5%) from MS patients could be reclassified as normal/abnormal, that is, below/above cut-off, when measured at different facilities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that results of NFL in CSF and blood measured with SIMOA are comparable between facilities. Nevertheless, healthcare practitioners should consider reference values at different laboratories, since different sensitivity/specificity can affect interpretation when low values are adjacent to cut-offs. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7871722/ /pubmed/33681796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Sejbaek, Tobias Mendoza, Jason P Penner, Natasha Madsen, Jonna Skov Olsen, Dorte Aalund Illes, Zsolt Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title | Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title_full | Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title_fullStr | Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title_short | Comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
title_sort | comparison of neurofilament light chain results between two independent facilities |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2020-000063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sejbaektobias comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities AT mendozajasonp comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities AT pennernatasha comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities AT madsenjonnaskov comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities AT olsendorteaalund comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities AT illeszsolt comparisonofneurofilamentlightchainresultsbetweentwoindependentfacilities |