Cargando…

Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography

Plant stress detection is considered one of the most critical areas for the improvement of crop yield in the compelling worldwide scenario, dictated by both the climate change and the geopolitical consequences of the Covid-19 epidemics. A complicated interconnection of biotic and abiotic stressors a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galieni, Angelica, D'Ascenzo, Nicola, Stagnari, Fabio, Pagnani, Giancarlo, Xie, Qingguo, Pisante, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.609155
_version_ 1783649396286554112
author Galieni, Angelica
D'Ascenzo, Nicola
Stagnari, Fabio
Pagnani, Giancarlo
Xie, Qingguo
Pisante, Michele
author_facet Galieni, Angelica
D'Ascenzo, Nicola
Stagnari, Fabio
Pagnani, Giancarlo
Xie, Qingguo
Pisante, Michele
author_sort Galieni, Angelica
collection PubMed
description Plant stress detection is considered one of the most critical areas for the improvement of crop yield in the compelling worldwide scenario, dictated by both the climate change and the geopolitical consequences of the Covid-19 epidemics. A complicated interconnection of biotic and abiotic stressors affect plant growth, including water, salt, temperature, light exposure, nutrients availability, agrochemicals, air and soil pollutants, pests and diseases. In facing this extended panorama, the technology choice is manifold. On the one hand, quantitative methods, such as metabolomics, provide very sensitive indicators of most of the stressors, with the drawback of a disruptive approach, which prevents follow up and dynamical studies. On the other hand qualitative methods, such as fluorescence, thermography and VIS/NIR reflectance, provide a non-disruptive view of the action of the stressors in plants, even across large fields, with the drawback of a poor accuracy. When looking at the spatial scale, the effect of stress may imply modifications from DNA level (nanometers) up to cell (micrometers), full plant (millimeters to meters), and entire field (kilometers). While quantitative techniques are sensitive to the smallest scales, only qualitative approaches can be used for the larger ones. Emerging technologies from nuclear and medical physics, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, are expected to bridge the gap of quantitative non-disruptive morphologic and functional measurements at larger scale. In this review we analyze the landscape of the different technologies nowadays available, showing the benefits of each approach in plant stress detection, with a particular focus on the gaps, which will be filled in the nearby future by the emerging nuclear physics approaches to agriculture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7873487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78734872021-02-11 Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography Galieni, Angelica D'Ascenzo, Nicola Stagnari, Fabio Pagnani, Giancarlo Xie, Qingguo Pisante, Michele Front Plant Sci Plant Science Plant stress detection is considered one of the most critical areas for the improvement of crop yield in the compelling worldwide scenario, dictated by both the climate change and the geopolitical consequences of the Covid-19 epidemics. A complicated interconnection of biotic and abiotic stressors affect plant growth, including water, salt, temperature, light exposure, nutrients availability, agrochemicals, air and soil pollutants, pests and diseases. In facing this extended panorama, the technology choice is manifold. On the one hand, quantitative methods, such as metabolomics, provide very sensitive indicators of most of the stressors, with the drawback of a disruptive approach, which prevents follow up and dynamical studies. On the other hand qualitative methods, such as fluorescence, thermography and VIS/NIR reflectance, provide a non-disruptive view of the action of the stressors in plants, even across large fields, with the drawback of a poor accuracy. When looking at the spatial scale, the effect of stress may imply modifications from DNA level (nanometers) up to cell (micrometers), full plant (millimeters to meters), and entire field (kilometers). While quantitative techniques are sensitive to the smallest scales, only qualitative approaches can be used for the larger ones. Emerging technologies from nuclear and medical physics, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, are expected to bridge the gap of quantitative non-disruptive morphologic and functional measurements at larger scale. In this review we analyze the landscape of the different technologies nowadays available, showing the benefits of each approach in plant stress detection, with a particular focus on the gaps, which will be filled in the nearby future by the emerging nuclear physics approaches to agriculture. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7873487/ /pubmed/33584752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.609155 Text en Copyright © 2021 Galieni, D'Ascenzo, Stagnari, Pagnani, Xie and Pisante. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Galieni, Angelica
D'Ascenzo, Nicola
Stagnari, Fabio
Pagnani, Giancarlo
Xie, Qingguo
Pisante, Michele
Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title_full Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title_fullStr Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title_short Past and Future of Plant Stress Detection: An Overview From Remote Sensing to Positron Emission Tomography
title_sort past and future of plant stress detection: an overview from remote sensing to positron emission tomography
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584752
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.609155
work_keys_str_mv AT galieniangelica pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography
AT dascenzonicola pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography
AT stagnarifabio pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography
AT pagnanigiancarlo pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography
AT xieqingguo pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography
AT pisantemichele pastandfutureofplantstressdetectionanoverviewfromremotesensingtopositronemissiontomography