Cargando…

Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana

We conducted cost effectiveness analyses of four different CLTS interventions implemented in Ethiopia and Ghana. In each country, a pilot approach in which additional local actors were trained in CLTS facilitation was compared to the conventional approach. Data were collected using bottom-up costing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crocker, Jonny, Fuente, David, Bartram, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urban & Fischer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113682
_version_ 1783649414932332544
author Crocker, Jonny
Fuente, David
Bartram, Jamie
author_facet Crocker, Jonny
Fuente, David
Bartram, Jamie
author_sort Crocker, Jonny
collection PubMed
description We conducted cost effectiveness analyses of four different CLTS interventions implemented in Ethiopia and Ghana. In each country, a pilot approach in which additional local actors were trained in CLTS facilitation was compared to the conventional approach. Data were collected using bottom-up costing, household surveys, and observations. We assessed variability of cost effectiveness from a societal perspective for latrine ownership and latrine use outcomes in different contexts. Cost effectiveness ranged from $34–$1897 per household ($5.85–$563 per person) gaining access to a private latrine or stopping open defecation, depending on the intervention, context, and outcome considered. For three out of four interventions, CLTS appeared more cost effective at reducing open defecation than at increasing latrine ownership, although sensitivity analysis revealed considerable variation. The pilot approaches were more cost effective at reducing open defecation than conventional approaches in Ethiopia, but not in Ghana. CLTS has been promoted as a low-cost means of improving the ownership and use of sanitation facilities. In our study, the cost of CLTS per household gaining latrine access was slightly higher than in other studies, and the cost of CLTS per household stopping OD was slightly lower than in other studies. Our results show that aggregate measures mask considerable variability in costs and outcomes, and thus the importance of considering and reporting context and uncertainty in economic analysis of sanitation interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7873587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Urban & Fischer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78735872021-03-01 Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana Crocker, Jonny Fuente, David Bartram, Jamie Int J Hyg Environ Health Article We conducted cost effectiveness analyses of four different CLTS interventions implemented in Ethiopia and Ghana. In each country, a pilot approach in which additional local actors were trained in CLTS facilitation was compared to the conventional approach. Data were collected using bottom-up costing, household surveys, and observations. We assessed variability of cost effectiveness from a societal perspective for latrine ownership and latrine use outcomes in different contexts. Cost effectiveness ranged from $34–$1897 per household ($5.85–$563 per person) gaining access to a private latrine or stopping open defecation, depending on the intervention, context, and outcome considered. For three out of four interventions, CLTS appeared more cost effective at reducing open defecation than at increasing latrine ownership, although sensitivity analysis revealed considerable variation. The pilot approaches were more cost effective at reducing open defecation than conventional approaches in Ethiopia, but not in Ghana. CLTS has been promoted as a low-cost means of improving the ownership and use of sanitation facilities. In our study, the cost of CLTS per household gaining latrine access was slightly higher than in other studies, and the cost of CLTS per household stopping OD was slightly lower than in other studies. Our results show that aggregate measures mask considerable variability in costs and outcomes, and thus the importance of considering and reporting context and uncertainty in economic analysis of sanitation interventions. Urban & Fischer 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7873587/ /pubmed/33360500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113682 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Crocker, Jonny
Fuente, David
Bartram, Jamie
Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title_full Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title_fullStr Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title_short Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
title_sort cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in ethiopia and ghana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113682
work_keys_str_mv AT crockerjonny costeffectivenessofcommunityledtotalsanitationinethiopiaandghana
AT fuentedavid costeffectivenessofcommunityledtotalsanitationinethiopiaandghana
AT bartramjamie costeffectivenessofcommunityledtotalsanitationinethiopiaandghana