Evolving to Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCE): Transitional experience in an undergraduate pharmacy program in Kuwait

BACKGROUND: Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs) can assess professional competencies in a structured manner and facilitate objective evaluation of clinical performance. With limited data from the Eastern Mediterranean region, this study aims to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of OSCEs for final year pharmacy students in Kuwait. The study also aims to compare students' performance in two academic years (2015–2016 and 2016–2017). METHODS: The design, implementation, and evaluation of the competency-based OSCE followed a 3-phase systematic evidence-based approach. The development phase involved establishing an OSCE working group to develop a blueprint and scoring rubrics and to organise assessors and standardised patient/physician training. The implementation phase involved conducting formative and summative OSCEs. The evaluation phase involved undertaking student and staff perception surveys. RESULTS: The overall students' OSCE scores for the academic years 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 were (median (interquartile range)) (71.6%, 32.2) and (60.0% (30.7)) and respectively (p < 0.0001). The average students' performance score was high in stations covering 'patient consultation and diagnosis' competency (71.4% (95% CI: 66.7–73.3)) and lower in stations covering 'monitoring of medicine therapy' competency (50.0% (95% CI: 33.3–66.7)). Students perceived stations covering 'monitoring medicines therapy' and 'assessment of medicine' as difficult. However, staff perceived stations related to 'patient consultation and diagnosis' competency as the easiest. Students reported that the OSCE was a positive experience as it provided them an opportunity to practice real life scenarios in a safe learning environment. CONCLUSION: The OSCE helped to identify the level of competency of students prior to graduation and areas to improve in the curriculum.