Cargando…
Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition
The Attention Restoration Theory (ART) has been widely cited to account for beneficial effects of natural environments on affect and attention. However, the effects of environment and exercise are not consistent. In a within-subjects design, participants completed affective and cognitive measures th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575245 |
_version_ | 1783649475152052224 |
---|---|
author | Trammell, Janet P. Aguilar, Shaya C. |
author_facet | Trammell, Janet P. Aguilar, Shaya C. |
author_sort | Trammell, Janet P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Attention Restoration Theory (ART) has been widely cited to account for beneficial effects of natural environments on affect and attention. However, the effects of environment and exercise are not consistent. In a within-subjects design, participants completed affective and cognitive measures that varied in attentional demands (memory, working memory, and executive function) both before and after exercise in a natural and indoor environment. Contrary to the hypotheses, a natural environment resulted in lower positive affect and no difference in negative affect compared to an indoor environment. A natural environment resulted in the most improvement for cognitive tasks that required moderate attentional demand: Trail Making Test A and Digit Span Forwards. As predicted, exercise resulted in improved affect and improved executive function (Trail Making Test B). There were no interactions between environment and exercise. These results suggest that ART cannot fully explain the influence of environment on affect and cognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7873912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78739122021-02-11 Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition Trammell, Janet P. Aguilar, Shaya C. Front Psychol Psychology The Attention Restoration Theory (ART) has been widely cited to account for beneficial effects of natural environments on affect and attention. However, the effects of environment and exercise are not consistent. In a within-subjects design, participants completed affective and cognitive measures that varied in attentional demands (memory, working memory, and executive function) both before and after exercise in a natural and indoor environment. Contrary to the hypotheses, a natural environment resulted in lower positive affect and no difference in negative affect compared to an indoor environment. A natural environment resulted in the most improvement for cognitive tasks that required moderate attentional demand: Trail Making Test A and Digit Span Forwards. As predicted, exercise resulted in improved affect and improved executive function (Trail Making Test B). There were no interactions between environment and exercise. These results suggest that ART cannot fully explain the influence of environment on affect and cognition. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7873912/ /pubmed/33584411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575245 Text en Copyright © 2021 Trammell and Aguilar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Trammell, Janet P. Aguilar, Shaya C. Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title | Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title_full | Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title_fullStr | Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title_short | Natural Is Not Always Better: The Varied Effects of a Natural Environment and Exercise on Affect and Cognition |
title_sort | natural is not always better: the varied effects of a natural environment and exercise on affect and cognition |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trammelljanetp naturalisnotalwaysbetterthevariedeffectsofanaturalenvironmentandexerciseonaffectandcognition AT aguilarshayac naturalisnotalwaysbetterthevariedeffectsofanaturalenvironmentandexerciseonaffectandcognition |