Cargando…

Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyakoshi, Makoto, Schmitt, Lauren M., Erickson, Craig A., Sweeney, John A., Pedapati, Ernest V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2020.597079
_version_ 1783649475390078976
author Miyakoshi, Makoto
Schmitt, Lauren M.
Erickson, Craig A.
Sweeney, John A.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
author_facet Miyakoshi, Makoto
Schmitt, Lauren M.
Erickson, Craig A.
Sweeney, John A.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
author_sort Miyakoshi, Makoto
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7873913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78739132021-02-11 Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection? Miyakoshi, Makoto Schmitt, Lauren M. Erickson, Craig A. Sweeney, John A. Pedapati, Ernest V. Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7873913/ /pubmed/33584237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2020.597079 Text en Copyright © 2021 Miyakoshi, Schmitt, Erickson, Sweeney and Pedapati. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Miyakoshi, Makoto
Schmitt, Lauren M.
Erickson, Craig A.
Sweeney, John A.
Pedapati, Ernest V.
Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title_full Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title_fullStr Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title_short Can We Push the “Quasi-Perfect Artifact Rejection” Even Closer to Perfection?
title_sort can we push the “quasi-perfect artifact rejection” even closer to perfection?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2020.597079
work_keys_str_mv AT miyakoshimakoto canwepushthequasiperfectartifactrejectionevenclosertoperfection
AT schmittlaurenm canwepushthequasiperfectartifactrejectionevenclosertoperfection
AT ericksoncraiga canwepushthequasiperfectartifactrejectionevenclosertoperfection
AT sweeneyjohna canwepushthequasiperfectartifactrejectionevenclosertoperfection
AT pedapatiernestv canwepushthequasiperfectartifactrejectionevenclosertoperfection