Cargando…

Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Stenting treatment for refractory symptomatic patients with vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is safe; however, there is a high rate of in-stent restenosis. Although drug-eluting stents can reduce the incidence of restenosis to some extent, there is still a risk caused by stent fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yabing, Ma, Yan, Gao, Peng, Chen, Yanfei, Yang, Bin, Feng, Yao, Jiao, Liqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.579238
_version_ 1783649506593603584
author Wang, Yabing
Ma, Yan
Gao, Peng
Chen, Yanfei
Yang, Bin
Feng, Yao
Jiao, Liqun
author_facet Wang, Yabing
Ma, Yan
Gao, Peng
Chen, Yanfei
Yang, Bin
Feng, Yao
Jiao, Liqun
author_sort Wang, Yabing
collection PubMed
description Background: Stenting treatment for refractory symptomatic patients with vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is safe; however, there is a high rate of in-stent restenosis. Although drug-eluting stents can reduce the incidence of restenosis to some extent, there is still a risk caused by stent fracture. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been proven to reduce the rate of restenosis in peripheral and coronary artery disease. DCB can prevent inflammation caused by extraneous material stimulation and allow the subsequent treatment that is characteristic of “leave nothing behind.” The purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of DCB and bare metal stent (BMS) in the treatment of VAOS. Method/Design: This trial is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial that compares the DCB to BMS in terms of angiographically assessed target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months in endovascular treatment of symptomatic patients with VAOS. Discussion: A total of 180 patients with symptomatic VAOS who match the trial eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with DCB (n = 90) or BMS (n = 90). An angiographic core laboratory-adjudicated target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months of follow-up was selected as primary efficacy endpoint to assess the DCB treatment effect. A clinical events committee will assess the safety endpoints of all-cause death, target vessel related transient ischemic attack and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke events. A data safety monitoring board will periodically review safety data for subject safety, the study conduct, and progress. In this trial, randomization is only allowed after successful pre-dilatation. We anticipate that this trial will provide rigorous data to clarify whether DCBs are beneficial in patients with symptomatic VAOS. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03910166.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78740442021-02-11 Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Wang, Yabing Ma, Yan Gao, Peng Chen, Yanfei Yang, Bin Feng, Yao Jiao, Liqun Front Neurol Neurology Background: Stenting treatment for refractory symptomatic patients with vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) is safe; however, there is a high rate of in-stent restenosis. Although drug-eluting stents can reduce the incidence of restenosis to some extent, there is still a risk caused by stent fracture. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been proven to reduce the rate of restenosis in peripheral and coronary artery disease. DCB can prevent inflammation caused by extraneous material stimulation and allow the subsequent treatment that is characteristic of “leave nothing behind.” The purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of DCB and bare metal stent (BMS) in the treatment of VAOS. Method/Design: This trial is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial that compares the DCB to BMS in terms of angiographically assessed target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months in endovascular treatment of symptomatic patients with VAOS. Discussion: A total of 180 patients with symptomatic VAOS who match the trial eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment with DCB (n = 90) or BMS (n = 90). An angiographic core laboratory-adjudicated target lesion binary restenosis (≥50%) at 12 months of follow-up was selected as primary efficacy endpoint to assess the DCB treatment effect. A clinical events committee will assess the safety endpoints of all-cause death, target vessel related transient ischemic attack and ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke events. A data safety monitoring board will periodically review safety data for subject safety, the study conduct, and progress. In this trial, randomization is only allowed after successful pre-dilatation. We anticipate that this trial will provide rigorous data to clarify whether DCBs are beneficial in patients with symptomatic VAOS. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03910166. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7874044/ /pubmed/33584491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.579238 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Ma, Gao, Chen, Yang, Feng and Jiao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Wang, Yabing
Ma, Yan
Gao, Peng
Chen, Yanfei
Yang, Bin
Feng, Yao
Jiao, Liqun
Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs. Bare Metal Stent for Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Origin Stenosis Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort paclitaxel coated balloon vs. bare metal stent for endovascular treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.579238
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyabing paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mayan paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaopeng paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenyanfei paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangbin paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fengyao paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiaoliqun paclitaxelcoatedballoonvsbaremetalstentforendovasculartreatmentofsymptomaticvertebralarteryoriginstenosispatientsprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial