Cargando…

Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development

Eye gaze is a ubiquitous cue in child–caregiver interactions, and infants are highly attentive to eye gaze from very early on. However, the question of why infants show gaze-sensitive behavior, and what role this sensitivity to gaze plays in their language development, is not yet well-understood. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çetinçelik, Melis, Rowland, Caroline F., Snijders, Tineke M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589096
_version_ 1783649509141643264
author Çetinçelik, Melis
Rowland, Caroline F.
Snijders, Tineke M.
author_facet Çetinçelik, Melis
Rowland, Caroline F.
Snijders, Tineke M.
author_sort Çetinçelik, Melis
collection PubMed
description Eye gaze is a ubiquitous cue in child–caregiver interactions, and infants are highly attentive to eye gaze from very early on. However, the question of why infants show gaze-sensitive behavior, and what role this sensitivity to gaze plays in their language development, is not yet well-understood. To gain a better understanding of the role of eye gaze in infants' language learning, we conducted a broad systematic review of the developmental literature for all studies that investigate the role of eye gaze in infants' language development. Across 77 peer-reviewed articles containing data from typically developing human infants (0–24 months) in the domain of language development, we identified two broad themes. The first tracked the effect of eye gaze on four developmental domains: (1) vocabulary development, (2) word–object mapping, (3) object processing, and (4) speech processing. Overall, there is considerable evidence that infants learn more about objects and are more likely to form word–object mappings in the presence of eye gaze cues, both of which are necessary for learning words. In addition, there is good evidence for longitudinal relationships between infants' gaze following abilities and later receptive and expressive vocabulary. However, many domains (e.g., speech processing) are understudied; further work is needed to decide whether gaze effects are specific to tasks, such as word–object mapping or whether they reflect a general learning enhancement mechanism. The second theme explored the reasons why eye gaze might be facilitative for learning, addressing the question of whether eye gaze is treated by infants as a specialized socio-cognitive cue. We concluded that the balance of evidence supports the idea that eye gaze facilitates infants' learning by enhancing their arousal, memory, and attentional capacities to a greater extent than other low-level attentional cues. However, as yet, there are too few studies that directly compare the effect of eye gaze cues and non-social, attentional cues for strong conclusions to be drawn. We also suggest that there might be a developmental effect, with eye gaze, over the course of the first 2 years of life, developing into a truly ostensive cue that enhances language learning across the board.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78740562021-02-11 Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development Çetinçelik, Melis Rowland, Caroline F. Snijders, Tineke M. Front Psychol Psychology Eye gaze is a ubiquitous cue in child–caregiver interactions, and infants are highly attentive to eye gaze from very early on. However, the question of why infants show gaze-sensitive behavior, and what role this sensitivity to gaze plays in their language development, is not yet well-understood. To gain a better understanding of the role of eye gaze in infants' language learning, we conducted a broad systematic review of the developmental literature for all studies that investigate the role of eye gaze in infants' language development. Across 77 peer-reviewed articles containing data from typically developing human infants (0–24 months) in the domain of language development, we identified two broad themes. The first tracked the effect of eye gaze on four developmental domains: (1) vocabulary development, (2) word–object mapping, (3) object processing, and (4) speech processing. Overall, there is considerable evidence that infants learn more about objects and are more likely to form word–object mappings in the presence of eye gaze cues, both of which are necessary for learning words. In addition, there is good evidence for longitudinal relationships between infants' gaze following abilities and later receptive and expressive vocabulary. However, many domains (e.g., speech processing) are understudied; further work is needed to decide whether gaze effects are specific to tasks, such as word–object mapping or whether they reflect a general learning enhancement mechanism. The second theme explored the reasons why eye gaze might be facilitative for learning, addressing the question of whether eye gaze is treated by infants as a specialized socio-cognitive cue. We concluded that the balance of evidence supports the idea that eye gaze facilitates infants' learning by enhancing their arousal, memory, and attentional capacities to a greater extent than other low-level attentional cues. However, as yet, there are too few studies that directly compare the effect of eye gaze cues and non-social, attentional cues for strong conclusions to be drawn. We also suggest that there might be a developmental effect, with eye gaze, over the course of the first 2 years of life, developing into a truly ostensive cue that enhances language learning across the board. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7874056/ /pubmed/33584424 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589096 Text en Copyright © 2021 Çetinçelik, Rowland and Snijders. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Çetinçelik, Melis
Rowland, Caroline F.
Snijders, Tineke M.
Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title_full Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title_fullStr Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title_full_unstemmed Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title_short Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
title_sort do the eyes have it? a systematic review on the role of eye gaze in infant language development
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584424
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589096
work_keys_str_mv AT cetincelikmelis dotheeyeshaveitasystematicreviewontheroleofeyegazeininfantlanguagedevelopment
AT rowlandcarolinef dotheeyeshaveitasystematicreviewontheroleofeyegazeininfantlanguagedevelopment
AT snijderstinekem dotheeyeshaveitasystematicreviewontheroleofeyegazeininfantlanguagedevelopment