Cargando…

Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohki, Yoko, Igarashi, Yoshio, Yamauchi, Keita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.616223
_version_ 1783649517217775616
author Ohki, Yoko
Igarashi, Yoshio
Yamauchi, Keita
author_facet Ohki, Yoko
Igarashi, Yoshio
Yamauchi, Keita
author_sort Ohki, Yoko
collection PubMed
description Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work continuation for subjects who RTW after RP participation and treatment as usual (TAU) and subjects who received TAU only were compared. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Additionally, propensity score matching was conducted to control for possible confounds. Results: Log-rank test of overall cohort (n = 323) showed that work continuation of RP + TAU subjects was significantly better compared to that of TAU-only subjects (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found a hazard rate of recurrent sick leave for TAU-only subjects of 2.121 (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.360–3.309). Additionally, the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 100) had similar differences (p = 0.008), with a hazard ratio of recurrent sick leave of 2.871 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.302–6.331) for TAU-only subjects. Limitations: Only workers who RTW after sick leave were targeted, and no examination was made considering cases who dropped out from RP or TAU. Moreover, the sample was a non-randomized controlled trial, with propensity score matching performed. However, there was an inability to retrieve and adjust for working environment background factors after RTW. Conclusions: Work continuation of subjects with RP was observed to be significantly better, suggesting that the RP was effective for recurrent sick leave prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78740902021-02-11 Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program Ohki, Yoko Igarashi, Yoshio Yamauchi, Keita Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the Japanese re-work program (RP) to aid in recurrent sick leave prevention. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort research was conducted for workers who returned to work (RTW) after sick leave due to mood disorder. Work continuation for subjects who RTW after RP participation and treatment as usual (TAU) and subjects who received TAU only were compared. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized. Additionally, propensity score matching was conducted to control for possible confounds. Results: Log-rank test of overall cohort (n = 323) showed that work continuation of RP + TAU subjects was significantly better compared to that of TAU-only subjects (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis found a hazard rate of recurrent sick leave for TAU-only subjects of 2.121 (p = 0.001, 95% CI: 1.360–3.309). Additionally, the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 100) had similar differences (p = 0.008), with a hazard ratio of recurrent sick leave of 2.871 (p = 0.009, 95% CI: 1.302–6.331) for TAU-only subjects. Limitations: Only workers who RTW after sick leave were targeted, and no examination was made considering cases who dropped out from RP or TAU. Moreover, the sample was a non-randomized controlled trial, with propensity score matching performed. However, there was an inability to retrieve and adjust for working environment background factors after RTW. Conclusions: Work continuation of subjects with RP was observed to be significantly better, suggesting that the RP was effective for recurrent sick leave prevention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7874090/ /pubmed/33584377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.616223 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ohki, Igarashi and Yamauchi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Ohki, Yoko
Igarashi, Yoshio
Yamauchi, Keita
Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title_full Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title_fullStr Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title_full_unstemmed Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title_short Re-work Program in Japan—Overview and Outcome of the Program
title_sort re-work program in japan—overview and outcome of the program
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.616223
work_keys_str_mv AT ohkiyoko reworkprograminjapanoverviewandoutcomeoftheprogram
AT igarashiyoshio reworkprograminjapanoverviewandoutcomeoftheprogram
AT yamauchikeita reworkprograminjapanoverviewandoutcomeoftheprogram