Cargando…

Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are malignancies with a unique biology, pathology, clinical appearance, and excellent outcomes. A correct radiographic assessment of GCTs is extremely important for the clinical management in several typical scenarios. Advancements in the field of diagnostic medici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makovník, Marek, Rejleková, Katarína, Uhrin, Ivan, Mego, Michal, Chovanec, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.587523
_version_ 1783649551431761920
author Makovník, Marek
Rejleková, Katarína
Uhrin, Ivan
Mego, Michal
Chovanec, Michal
author_facet Makovník, Marek
Rejleková, Katarína
Uhrin, Ivan
Mego, Michal
Chovanec, Michal
author_sort Makovník, Marek
collection PubMed
description Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are malignancies with a unique biology, pathology, clinical appearance, and excellent outcomes. A correct radiographic assessment of GCTs is extremely important for the clinical management in several typical scenarios. Advancements in the field of diagnostic medicine bring an increasing number of sophisticated imaging methods to increase the performance of imaging studies. The conventional computed tomography (CT) remains the mainstay of diagnostic imaging in the management of GCTs. While certain improvements in the sensitivity and specificity are suggested with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with lymphotrophic nanoparticles in evaluating retroperitoneal lymph nodes during the staging procedure, further exploration in larger prospective studies is needed. A common diagnostic dilemma is assessing the post-chemotherapy residual disease in GCTs. Several studies have consistently shown advantages in the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with seminoma, but not with non-seminoma. Recommendations suggest that seminoma patients with a residual disease in the retroperitoneum larger than 3 cm should be subjected for PET scanning with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose. Relatively high sensitivity, specificity and a negative predictive value (80–95%) may guide clinical decision to spare these patients of high morbidity of an unnecessary surgery. However, a positive predictive value of around 50% renders PET scanning difficult to interpret in the case of positive finding. These patients often require extremely difficult surgical procedures with the high risk of post-operative morbidity. Therefore, seminoma patients with PET positive residual masses larger than 3 cm still remain a serious challenge in the decision making of nuclear medicine specialist, oncologists, and urologic surgeons. In this article, we aim to summarize data on controversial dilemmas in staging procedures, active surveillance, and post-chemotherapy assessment of GCTs based on the available published literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78742362021-02-11 Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors Makovník, Marek Rejleková, Katarína Uhrin, Ivan Mego, Michal Chovanec, Michal Front Oncol Oncology Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are malignancies with a unique biology, pathology, clinical appearance, and excellent outcomes. A correct radiographic assessment of GCTs is extremely important for the clinical management in several typical scenarios. Advancements in the field of diagnostic medicine bring an increasing number of sophisticated imaging methods to increase the performance of imaging studies. The conventional computed tomography (CT) remains the mainstay of diagnostic imaging in the management of GCTs. While certain improvements in the sensitivity and specificity are suggested with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with lymphotrophic nanoparticles in evaluating retroperitoneal lymph nodes during the staging procedure, further exploration in larger prospective studies is needed. A common diagnostic dilemma is assessing the post-chemotherapy residual disease in GCTs. Several studies have consistently shown advantages in the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with seminoma, but not with non-seminoma. Recommendations suggest that seminoma patients with a residual disease in the retroperitoneum larger than 3 cm should be subjected for PET scanning with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose. Relatively high sensitivity, specificity and a negative predictive value (80–95%) may guide clinical decision to spare these patients of high morbidity of an unnecessary surgery. However, a positive predictive value of around 50% renders PET scanning difficult to interpret in the case of positive finding. These patients often require extremely difficult surgical procedures with the high risk of post-operative morbidity. Therefore, seminoma patients with PET positive residual masses larger than 3 cm still remain a serious challenge in the decision making of nuclear medicine specialist, oncologists, and urologic surgeons. In this article, we aim to summarize data on controversial dilemmas in staging procedures, active surveillance, and post-chemotherapy assessment of GCTs based on the available published literature. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7874236/ /pubmed/33585206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.587523 Text en Copyright © 2021 Makovník, Rejleková, Uhrin, Mego and Chovanec http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Makovník, Marek
Rejleková, Katarína
Uhrin, Ivan
Mego, Michal
Chovanec, Michal
Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title_full Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title_fullStr Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title_short Intricacies of Radiographic Assessment in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors
title_sort intricacies of radiographic assessment in testicular germ cell tumors
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33585206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.587523
work_keys_str_mv AT makovnikmarek intricaciesofradiographicassessmentintesticulargermcelltumors
AT rejlekovakatarina intricaciesofradiographicassessmentintesticulargermcelltumors
AT uhrinivan intricaciesofradiographicassessmentintesticulargermcelltumors
AT megomichal intricaciesofradiographicassessmentintesticulargermcelltumors
AT chovanecmichal intricaciesofradiographicassessmentintesticulargermcelltumors