Cargando…

Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined

Healthcare systems all over the world have been enormously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) taking care of these patients need personal protective equipments (PPEs) standardized for full protection from droplets and aerosols carrying viral load to variable distances. Ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapoor, Aditya, Baronia, Arvind Kumar, Azim, Afzal, Agarwal, Gaurav, Prasad, Narayan, Mishra, Richa, Saraswat, Vivek Anand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603295
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23598
_version_ 1783649565271916544
author Kapoor, Aditya
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Azim, Afzal
Agarwal, Gaurav
Prasad, Narayan
Mishra, Richa
Saraswat, Vivek Anand
author_facet Kapoor, Aditya
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Azim, Afzal
Agarwal, Gaurav
Prasad, Narayan
Mishra, Richa
Saraswat, Vivek Anand
author_sort Kapoor, Aditya
collection PubMed
description Healthcare systems all over the world have been enormously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) taking care of these patients need personal protective equipments (PPEs) standardized for full protection from droplets and aerosols carrying viral load to variable distances. There has been a surge of manufacturers supplying these protective gears in India and regulatory agencies have issued technical specifications pertaining to PPEs focusing solely on synthetic blood penetration tests (SBPTs) and keeping the upper limit of non-woven fabric to 95 g/m(2) (GSM). These PPE specifications are silent on air permeability (AP) and water/moisture vapor transmission rate (WVTR/MVTR) of the fabric. As a result, most of the PPE kits, despite having appropriate SBPT certifications from regulatory agencies, have extremely poor permeability and breathability. The acceptability of PPEs by HCWs can be vastly improved when the end-users are proactively invited to participate in “comfort testing” of PPEs before getting issuance of certification for marketing. “Field testing” or “end-user trials” in which HCWs don the PPE and assess it for comfort while performing different types of clinical work, e.g., in intensive care units (ICUs), operation theaters, cath labs, etc., also takes into account a hitherto often ignored “human-comfort-factor” that not only enhances the understanding of HCWs about the need for the PPEs but can also motivate them to use it without worrying about discomfort. We hereby propose that comfort fit testing (COmfort and Material Fit is an Obviously Required Test) should be a part of the mandatory testing and certification process for PPE, so that the industry invests wisely in manufacturing PPE kits that are not only certified for fabric but are also tested for comfort factors. How to cite this article: Kapoor A, Baronia AK, Azim A, Agarwal G, Prasad N, Mishra R, et al. Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):12–15.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78742992021-02-17 Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined Kapoor, Aditya Baronia, Arvind Kumar Azim, Afzal Agarwal, Gaurav Prasad, Narayan Mishra, Richa Saraswat, Vivek Anand Indian J Crit Care Med Commentary Healthcare systems all over the world have been enormously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) taking care of these patients need personal protective equipments (PPEs) standardized for full protection from droplets and aerosols carrying viral load to variable distances. There has been a surge of manufacturers supplying these protective gears in India and regulatory agencies have issued technical specifications pertaining to PPEs focusing solely on synthetic blood penetration tests (SBPTs) and keeping the upper limit of non-woven fabric to 95 g/m(2) (GSM). These PPE specifications are silent on air permeability (AP) and water/moisture vapor transmission rate (WVTR/MVTR) of the fabric. As a result, most of the PPE kits, despite having appropriate SBPT certifications from regulatory agencies, have extremely poor permeability and breathability. The acceptability of PPEs by HCWs can be vastly improved when the end-users are proactively invited to participate in “comfort testing” of PPEs before getting issuance of certification for marketing. “Field testing” or “end-user trials” in which HCWs don the PPE and assess it for comfort while performing different types of clinical work, e.g., in intensive care units (ICUs), operation theaters, cath labs, etc., also takes into account a hitherto often ignored “human-comfort-factor” that not only enhances the understanding of HCWs about the need for the PPEs but can also motivate them to use it without worrying about discomfort. We hereby propose that comfort fit testing (COmfort and Material Fit is an Obviously Required Test) should be a part of the mandatory testing and certification process for PPE, so that the industry invests wisely in manufacturing PPE kits that are not only certified for fabric but are also tested for comfort factors. How to cite this article: Kapoor A, Baronia AK, Azim A, Agarwal G, Prasad N, Mishra R, et al. Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(1):12–15. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7874299/ /pubmed/33603295 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23598 Text en Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Kapoor, Aditya
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Azim, Afzal
Agarwal, Gaurav
Prasad, Narayan
Mishra, Richa
Saraswat, Vivek Anand
Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title_full Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title_fullStr Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title_full_unstemmed Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title_short Breathability and Safety Testing of Personal Protective Equipment: “Human-comfort” Factor Remains Undefined
title_sort breathability and safety testing of personal protective equipment: “human-comfort” factor remains undefined
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603295
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23598
work_keys_str_mv AT kapooraditya breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT baroniaarvindkumar breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT azimafzal breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT agarwalgaurav breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT prasadnarayan breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT mishraricha breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined
AT saraswatvivekanand breathabilityandsafetytestingofpersonalprotectiveequipmenthumancomfortfactorremainsundefined