Cargando…

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is satisfactory for hospitalized patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, only a few studies have reported about the day surgery patients undergoing PELD. METHODS: A total of 267 patients with LDH underwent PELD during day su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Zhaojun, Ran, Maobo, Luo, Juan, Zhang, Kai, Ye, Yongjie, Zheng, Jiazhuang, Zhang, Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6
_version_ 1783649600000753664
author Song, Zhaojun
Ran, Maobo
Luo, Juan
Zhang, Kai
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Zhang, Zhi
author_facet Song, Zhaojun
Ran, Maobo
Luo, Juan
Zhang, Kai
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Zhang, Zhi
author_sort Song, Zhaojun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is satisfactory for hospitalized patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, only a few studies have reported about the day surgery patients undergoing PELD. METHODS: A total of 267 patients with LDH underwent PELD during day surgery and were followed up for at least 3 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and lower back pain (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The radiological outcomes, such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the disc-height ratio, and disc instability, were recorded and compared. The clinical effects between patients treated by PELD during day surgery and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for contemporaneous hospitalized 116 patients with LDH were compared. RESULTS: Patients treated by PELD had lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay (P <  0.001) compared to those treated by MED. VAS-L, VAS-B, and ODI decreased significantly after PELD than before the operation and 3 years postoperatively. The postoperative VAS-B in the PELD group was significantly decreased than in the MED group (P = 0.001). The complications rate was 9.4% in the PELD group and 12.1% in the MED group (P = 0.471). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rate in the PELD group was much higher than that in MED group (P = 0.042). The postoperative LL and SS in the PELD group improved significantly compared to the values in the MED group (P <  0.001). According to the disc-height ratio at 3-year follow-up, a significant height loss was observed in the MED group than in the PELD group (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Although the 1-year postoperative recurrence rate was relatively high, the day surgery for LDH undergoing PELD had advantages in terms of less blood loss intraoperatively, short hospital stay, efficacy for back pain, and efficiency to maintain lumbar physiological curvature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78744952021-02-11 Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation Song, Zhaojun Ran, Maobo Luo, Juan Zhang, Kai Ye, Yongjie Zheng, Jiazhuang Zhang, Zhi BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is satisfactory for hospitalized patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, only a few studies have reported about the day surgery patients undergoing PELD. METHODS: A total of 267 patients with LDH underwent PELD during day surgery and were followed up for at least 3 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and lower back pain (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The radiological outcomes, such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the disc-height ratio, and disc instability, were recorded and compared. The clinical effects between patients treated by PELD during day surgery and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for contemporaneous hospitalized 116 patients with LDH were compared. RESULTS: Patients treated by PELD had lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay (P <  0.001) compared to those treated by MED. VAS-L, VAS-B, and ODI decreased significantly after PELD than before the operation and 3 years postoperatively. The postoperative VAS-B in the PELD group was significantly decreased than in the MED group (P = 0.001). The complications rate was 9.4% in the PELD group and 12.1% in the MED group (P = 0.471). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rate in the PELD group was much higher than that in MED group (P = 0.042). The postoperative LL and SS in the PELD group improved significantly compared to the values in the MED group (P <  0.001). According to the disc-height ratio at 3-year follow-up, a significant height loss was observed in the MED group than in the PELD group (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Although the 1-year postoperative recurrence rate was relatively high, the day surgery for LDH undergoing PELD had advantages in terms of less blood loss intraoperatively, short hospital stay, efficacy for back pain, and efficiency to maintain lumbar physiological curvature. BioMed Central 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7874495/ /pubmed/33563264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Song, Zhaojun
Ran, Maobo
Luo, Juan
Zhang, Kai
Ye, Yongjie
Zheng, Jiazhuang
Zhang, Zhi
Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title_full Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title_fullStr Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title_short Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
title_sort follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6
work_keys_str_mv AT songzhaojun followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT ranmaobo followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT luojuan followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT zhangkai followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT yeyongjie followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT zhengjiazhuang followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation
AT zhangzhi followupresultsofmicroendoscopicdiscectomycomparedtodaysurgeryusingpercutaneousendoscopiclumbardiscectomyforthetreatmentoflumbardischerniation