Cargando…
Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions
BACKGROUND: Since October 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has penalized 25% of U.S. hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions under the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP). While early evaluations of the HACRP program reported cumulative...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w |
_version_ | 1783649622702424064 |
---|---|
author | Vsevolozhskaya, Olga A. Manz, Karina C. Zephyr, Pierre M. Waters, Teresa M. |
author_facet | Vsevolozhskaya, Olga A. Manz, Karina C. Zephyr, Pierre M. Waters, Teresa M. |
author_sort | Vsevolozhskaya, Olga A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since October 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has penalized 25% of U.S. hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions under the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP). While early evaluations of the HACRP program reported cumulative reductions in hospital-acquired conditions, more recent studies have not found a clear association between receipt of the HACRP penalty and hospital quality of care. We posit that some of this disconnect may be driven by frequent scoring updates. The sensitivity of the HACRP penalties to updates in the program’s scoring methodology has not been independently evaluated. METHODS: We used hospital discharge records from 14 states to evaluate the association between changes in HACRP scoring methodology and corresponding shifts in penalty status. To isolate the impact of changes in scoring methods over time, we used FY2018 hospital performance data to calculate total HAC scores using FY2015 through FY2018 CMS scoring methodologies. RESULTS: Comparing hospital penalty status based on various HACRP scoring methodologies over time, we found a significant overlap between penalized hospitals when using FY 2015 and 2016 scoring methodologies (95%) and between FY 2017 and 2018 methodologies (46%), but substantial differences across early vs later years. Only 15% of hospitals were eligible for penalties across all four years. We also found significant changes in a hospital’s (relative) ranking across the various years, indicating that shifts in penalty status were not driven by small changes in HAC scores clustered around the penalty threshold. CONCLUSIONS: HACRP penalties have been highly sensitive to program updates, which are generally announced after performance periods are concluded. This disconnect between performance and penalties calls into question the ability of the HACRP to improve patient safety as intended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7874626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78746262021-02-11 Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions Vsevolozhskaya, Olga A. Manz, Karina C. Zephyr, Pierre M. Waters, Teresa M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Since October 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has penalized 25% of U.S. hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions under the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP). While early evaluations of the HACRP program reported cumulative reductions in hospital-acquired conditions, more recent studies have not found a clear association between receipt of the HACRP penalty and hospital quality of care. We posit that some of this disconnect may be driven by frequent scoring updates. The sensitivity of the HACRP penalties to updates in the program’s scoring methodology has not been independently evaluated. METHODS: We used hospital discharge records from 14 states to evaluate the association between changes in HACRP scoring methodology and corresponding shifts in penalty status. To isolate the impact of changes in scoring methods over time, we used FY2018 hospital performance data to calculate total HAC scores using FY2015 through FY2018 CMS scoring methodologies. RESULTS: Comparing hospital penalty status based on various HACRP scoring methodologies over time, we found a significant overlap between penalized hospitals when using FY 2015 and 2016 scoring methodologies (95%) and between FY 2017 and 2018 methodologies (46%), but substantial differences across early vs later years. Only 15% of hospitals were eligible for penalties across all four years. We also found significant changes in a hospital’s (relative) ranking across the various years, indicating that shifts in penalty status were not driven by small changes in HAC scores clustered around the penalty threshold. CONCLUSIONS: HACRP penalties have been highly sensitive to program updates, which are generally announced after performance periods are concluded. This disconnect between performance and penalties calls into question the ability of the HACRP to improve patient safety as intended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w). BioMed Central 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7874626/ /pubmed/33563278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vsevolozhskaya, Olga A. Manz, Karina C. Zephyr, Pierre M. Waters, Teresa M. Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title | Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title_full | Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title_fullStr | Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title_short | Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions |
title_sort | measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (hacrp) cost hospitals millions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06108-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vsevolozhskayaolgaa measurementmatterschangingpenaltycalculationsunderthehospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramhacrpcosthospitalsmillions AT manzkarinac measurementmatterschangingpenaltycalculationsunderthehospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramhacrpcosthospitalsmillions AT zephyrpierrem measurementmatterschangingpenaltycalculationsunderthehospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramhacrpcosthospitalsmillions AT watersteresam measurementmatterschangingpenaltycalculationsunderthehospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramhacrpcosthospitalsmillions |