Cargando…

Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practical effectiveness of smart metal artifact reduction (SMAR) in reducing artifacts caused by metallic implants. METHODS: Patients with metal implants underwent computed tomography (CT) examinations on high definition CT scanner, and the data were reconstructed with ada...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Peng, Zhang, Chunling, Gao, Zhen, Cai, Wangshu, Yan, Deyue, Wei, Zhaolong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2018-0021
_version_ 1783649638487687168
author Zhou, Peng
Zhang, Chunling
Gao, Zhen
Cai, Wangshu
Yan, Deyue
Wei, Zhaolong
author_facet Zhou, Peng
Zhang, Chunling
Gao, Zhen
Cai, Wangshu
Yan, Deyue
Wei, Zhaolong
author_sort Zhou, Peng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practical effectiveness of smart metal artifact reduction (SMAR) in reducing artifacts caused by metallic implants. METHODS: Patients with metal implants underwent computed tomography (CT) examinations on high definition CT scanner, and the data were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) with value weighted to 40% and smart metal artifact reduction (SMAR) technology. The comparison was assessed by both subjective and objective assessment between the two groups of images. In terms of subjective assessment, three radiologists evaluated image quality and assigned a score for visualization of anatomic structures in the critical areas of interest. Objectively, the absolute CT value of the difference (ΔCT) and artifacts index (AI) were adopted in this study for the quantitative assessment of metal artifacts. RESULTS: In subjective image quality assessment, three radiologists scored SMAR images higher than 40% ASiR images (P<0.01) and the result suggested that visualization of critical anatomic structures around the region of the metal object was significantly improved by using SMAR compared with 40% ASiR. The ΔCT and AI for quantitative assessment of metal artifacts showed that SMAR appeared to be superior for reducing metal artifacts (P<0.05) and indicated that this technical approach was more effective in improving the quality of CT images. CONCLUSION: A variety of hardware (dental filling, embolization coil, instrumented spine, hip implant, knee implant) are processed with the SMAR algorithm to demonstrate good recovery of soft tissue around the metal. This artifact reduction allows for the clearer visualization of structures hidden underneath.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78746962021-04-01 Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software Zhou, Peng Zhang, Chunling Gao, Zhen Cai, Wangshu Yan, Deyue Wei, Zhaolong Open Life Sci Topical Issue on Precision Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practical effectiveness of smart metal artifact reduction (SMAR) in reducing artifacts caused by metallic implants. METHODS: Patients with metal implants underwent computed tomography (CT) examinations on high definition CT scanner, and the data were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) with value weighted to 40% and smart metal artifact reduction (SMAR) technology. The comparison was assessed by both subjective and objective assessment between the two groups of images. In terms of subjective assessment, three radiologists evaluated image quality and assigned a score for visualization of anatomic structures in the critical areas of interest. Objectively, the absolute CT value of the difference (ΔCT) and artifacts index (AI) were adopted in this study for the quantitative assessment of metal artifacts. RESULTS: In subjective image quality assessment, three radiologists scored SMAR images higher than 40% ASiR images (P<0.01) and the result suggested that visualization of critical anatomic structures around the region of the metal object was significantly improved by using SMAR compared with 40% ASiR. The ΔCT and AI for quantitative assessment of metal artifacts showed that SMAR appeared to be superior for reducing metal artifacts (P<0.05) and indicated that this technical approach was more effective in improving the quality of CT images. CONCLUSION: A variety of hardware (dental filling, embolization coil, instrumented spine, hip implant, knee implant) are processed with the SMAR algorithm to demonstrate good recovery of soft tissue around the metal. This artifact reduction allows for the clearer visualization of structures hidden underneath. De Gruyter 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7874696/ /pubmed/33817081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2018-0021 Text en © 2018 Peng Zhou et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Topical Issue on Precision Medicine
Zhou, Peng
Zhang, Chunling
Gao, Zhen
Cai, Wangshu
Yan, Deyue
Wei, Zhaolong
Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title_full Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title_short Evaluation of the Quality of CT Images Acquired with Smart Metal Artifact Reduction Software
title_sort evaluation of the quality of ct images acquired with smart metal artifact reduction software
topic Topical Issue on Precision Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2018-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoupeng evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware
AT zhangchunling evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware
AT gaozhen evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware
AT caiwangshu evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware
AT yandeyue evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware
AT weizhaolong evaluationofthequalityofctimagesacquiredwithsmartmetalartifactreductionsoftware