Cargando…

Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties

The aim of the study was to compare the influence of selected soil bioconditioners and traditional fertilisation P+K+Ca on the vitality and yield of Lolium perenne and on the microbiological state of soil. The study was conducted between 2008 and 2009 – it was based on a field experiment started in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swędrzyńska, Dorota, Zielewicz, Waldemar, Swędrzyński, Arkadiusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0076
_version_ 1783649667950575616
author Swędrzyńska, Dorota
Zielewicz, Waldemar
Swędrzyński, Arkadiusz
author_facet Swędrzyńska, Dorota
Zielewicz, Waldemar
Swędrzyński, Arkadiusz
author_sort Swędrzyńska, Dorota
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to compare the influence of selected soil bioconditioners and traditional fertilisation P+K+Ca on the vitality and yield of Lolium perenne and on the microbiological state of soil. The study was conducted between 2008 and 2009 – it was based on a field experiment started in 2006, in Brody, at the Agricultural Experiment Station of the Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland. The factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with three replications. Two experimental factors were used: - non-nitrogen fertilisation (Physio-Mescal G18, PRP-SOL, Effective Microorganisms, Effective Microorganisms + Ca, P+K+Ca); - nitrogen fertilisation (N0 and N200 kg ha(-1)). The following parameters were measured: the yield of dry matter of perennial ryegrass, the plants’ vitality (chlorophyll concentration), the count of selected groups of soil microorganisms (heterotrophic, oligotrophic, copiotrophic bacteria, actinobacteria, fungi), soil enzymatic activity (dehydrogenases, acid phosphatase), and soil pH. The experiment showed that the bioconditioners were not an alternative to traditional mineral fertilisation, especially to nitrogen fertilisation, as a basic yield factor, but they could be a very valuable supplement to this fertilisation, and help to maintain the right biological potential of soil and its fertility, especially in the places where no manure or other non-chemical fertilisers are used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78748202021-04-01 Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties Swędrzyńska, Dorota Zielewicz, Waldemar Swędrzyński, Arkadiusz Open Life Sci Research Article The aim of the study was to compare the influence of selected soil bioconditioners and traditional fertilisation P+K+Ca on the vitality and yield of Lolium perenne and on the microbiological state of soil. The study was conducted between 2008 and 2009 – it was based on a field experiment started in 2006, in Brody, at the Agricultural Experiment Station of the Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland. The factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with three replications. Two experimental factors were used: - non-nitrogen fertilisation (Physio-Mescal G18, PRP-SOL, Effective Microorganisms, Effective Microorganisms + Ca, P+K+Ca); - nitrogen fertilisation (N0 and N200 kg ha(-1)). The following parameters were measured: the yield of dry matter of perennial ryegrass, the plants’ vitality (chlorophyll concentration), the count of selected groups of soil microorganisms (heterotrophic, oligotrophic, copiotrophic bacteria, actinobacteria, fungi), soil enzymatic activity (dehydrogenases, acid phosphatase), and soil pH. The experiment showed that the bioconditioners were not an alternative to traditional mineral fertilisation, especially to nitrogen fertilisation, as a basic yield factor, but they could be a very valuable supplement to this fertilisation, and help to maintain the right biological potential of soil and its fertility, especially in the places where no manure or other non-chemical fertilisers are used. De Gruyter 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7874820/ /pubmed/33817206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0076 Text en © 2019 Dorota Swędrzyńska et al. published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Swędrzyńska, Dorota
Zielewicz, Waldemar
Swędrzyński, Arkadiusz
Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title_full Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title_fullStr Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title_short Comparison of Soil Bioconditioners and Standard Fertilization in Terms of the Impact on Yield and Vitality of Lolium Perenne and Soil Biological Properties
title_sort comparison of soil bioconditioners and standard fertilization in terms of the impact on yield and vitality of lolium perenne and soil biological properties
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/biol-2019-0076
work_keys_str_mv AT swedrzynskadorota comparisonofsoilbioconditionersandstandardfertilizationintermsoftheimpactonyieldandvitalityofloliumperenneandsoilbiologicalproperties
AT zielewiczwaldemar comparisonofsoilbioconditionersandstandardfertilizationintermsoftheimpactonyieldandvitalityofloliumperenneandsoilbiologicalproperties
AT swedrzynskiarkadiusz comparisonofsoilbioconditionersandstandardfertilizationintermsoftheimpactonyieldandvitalityofloliumperenneandsoilbiologicalproperties