Cargando…

Peptide synthesis: ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy?

While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maurin, Ophélie, Verdié, Pascal, Subra, Gilles, Lamaty, Frédéric, Martinez, Jean, Métro, Thomas-Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Beilstein-Institut 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33613776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.13.206
Descripción
Sumario:While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesized by ball-milling, in solution, and on solid support. The three strategies were then compared in terms of yield, purity, reaction time and environmental impact. The results obtained enabled to draw some strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and to foresee what will have to be implemented to build more efficient and sustainable peptide syntheses in the near future.