Cargando…

An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a freely accessible internet algorithm to correctly identify the need for emergency ophthalmologic consultation for correct diagnosis and management. METHOD: This retrospective observational cohort study was based on the first 100 patients who req...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourdon, H., Herbaut, A., Trinh, L., Tuil, E., Girmens, J.F., Baudouin, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Masson SAS. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.12.002
_version_ 1783649691598061568
author Bourdon, H.
Herbaut, A.
Trinh, L.
Tuil, E.
Girmens, J.F.
Baudouin, C.
author_facet Bourdon, H.
Herbaut, A.
Trinh, L.
Tuil, E.
Girmens, J.F.
Baudouin, C.
author_sort Bourdon, H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a freely accessible internet algorithm to correctly identify the need for emergency ophthalmologic consultation for correct diagnosis and management. METHOD: This retrospective observational cohort study was based on the first 100 patients who requested recommendations on the necessity of breaking the lockdown for emergency ophthalmology consultation during the period from March to May 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients completed questionnaires. Forty-nine were directed to emergency consultation and 42 to differed scheduled visits or telemedicine visits. One patient sent for emergency consultation had an overestimated severity and could have been seen later, while two patients initially recommended for a scheduled visit were considered appropriate for emergency consultation. However, these patients’ management did not suffer as a consequence of the delay. The sensitivity of the algorithm, defined as the number of emergency consultations suggested by the algorithm divided by the total number of emergency consultations deemed appropriate by the practitioner's final evaluation, was 96.0%. The specificity of the algorithm, defined as the number of patients recommended for delayed consultation by the algorithm divided by the number of patients deemed clinically appropriate for this approach, was 97.5%. The positive predictive value, defined as the number of appropriate emergency consultations divided by the total number of emergency consultations suggested by the algorithm, was 97.9%. Finally, the negative predictive value, defined as the number of appropriately deferred patients divided by the number of deferred patients recommended by the algorithm, was 95.2%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the reliability of an algorithm based on patients’ past medical history and symptoms to classify patients and direct them to either emergency consultation or to a more appropriate deferred, scheduled appointment. This algorithm might allow reduction of walk-in visits by half and thus help control patient flow into ophthalmologic emergency departments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7874947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Masson SAS.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78749472021-02-11 An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients Bourdon, H. Herbaut, A. Trinh, L. Tuil, E. Girmens, J.F. Baudouin, C. J Fr Ophtalmol Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of a freely accessible internet algorithm to correctly identify the need for emergency ophthalmologic consultation for correct diagnosis and management. METHOD: This retrospective observational cohort study was based on the first 100 patients who requested recommendations on the necessity of breaking the lockdown for emergency ophthalmology consultation during the period from March to May 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients completed questionnaires. Forty-nine were directed to emergency consultation and 42 to differed scheduled visits or telemedicine visits. One patient sent for emergency consultation had an overestimated severity and could have been seen later, while two patients initially recommended for a scheduled visit were considered appropriate for emergency consultation. However, these patients’ management did not suffer as a consequence of the delay. The sensitivity of the algorithm, defined as the number of emergency consultations suggested by the algorithm divided by the total number of emergency consultations deemed appropriate by the practitioner's final evaluation, was 96.0%. The specificity of the algorithm, defined as the number of patients recommended for delayed consultation by the algorithm divided by the number of patients deemed clinically appropriate for this approach, was 97.5%. The positive predictive value, defined as the number of appropriate emergency consultations divided by the total number of emergency consultations suggested by the algorithm, was 97.9%. Finally, the negative predictive value, defined as the number of appropriately deferred patients divided by the number of deferred patients recommended by the algorithm, was 95.2%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the reliability of an algorithm based on patients’ past medical history and symptoms to classify patients and direct them to either emergency consultation or to a more appropriate deferred, scheduled appointment. This algorithm might allow reduction of walk-in visits by half and thus help control patient flow into ophthalmologic emergency departments. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2021-03 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7874947/ /pubmed/33612327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.12.002 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bourdon, H.
Herbaut, A.
Trinh, L.
Tuil, E.
Girmens, J.F.
Baudouin, C.
An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title_full An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title_fullStr An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title_full_unstemmed An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title_short An algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience of the first 100 patients
title_sort algorithm in ophthalmic emergencies to evaluate the necessity of physical consultation during covid-19 lockdown in paris: experience of the first 100 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7874947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33612327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bourdonh analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT herbauta analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT trinhl analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT tuile analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT girmensjf analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT baudouinc analgorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT bourdonh algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT herbauta algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT trinhl algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT tuile algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT girmensjf algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients
AT baudouinc algorithminophthalmicemergenciestoevaluatethenecessityofphysicalconsultationduringcovid19lockdowninparisexperienceofthefirst100patients