Cargando…

A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants

OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hultin, Kristina, Eriksson, Annelie, Backe, Christina, Johansson, Ulf, Bougas, Kostas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598111
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403
_version_ 1783649722835140608
author Hultin, Kristina
Eriksson, Annelie
Backe, Christina
Johansson, Ulf
Bougas, Kostas
author_facet Hultin, Kristina
Eriksson, Annelie
Backe, Christina
Johansson, Ulf
Bougas, Kostas
author_sort Hultin, Kristina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commercially pure titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present material includes consecutive patients referred to a specialist clinic in Sweden. Two patient groups treated with dental implants in two different materials - titanium (Ti) and titanium-zirconium (TiZr) - were defined after block randomisation for smoking. In total, 40 implants installed in 21 patients were available for one-year follow-up. Marginal bone level, soft tissue height and width of keratinised mucosa were registered at baseline and at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: At implant level, the test group (TiZr) yielded significant marginal bone loss (P < 0.001) after one year. Additionally, marginal bone loss after one year was significantly higher for TiZr implants (P < 0.001) as compared to traditional Ti implants. Soft tissue dimensions were stable throughout the evaluation time for both implant materials. CONCLUSIONS: One-year results indicate more pronounced initial marginal bone loss for dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy as compared to implants made of commercially pure titanium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7875101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78751012021-02-16 A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants Hultin, Kristina Eriksson, Annelie Backe, Christina Johansson, Ulf Bougas, Kostas J Oral Maxillofac Res Original Paper OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commercially pure titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present material includes consecutive patients referred to a specialist clinic in Sweden. Two patient groups treated with dental implants in two different materials - titanium (Ti) and titanium-zirconium (TiZr) - were defined after block randomisation for smoking. In total, 40 implants installed in 21 patients were available for one-year follow-up. Marginal bone level, soft tissue height and width of keratinised mucosa were registered at baseline and at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: At implant level, the test group (TiZr) yielded significant marginal bone loss (P < 0.001) after one year. Additionally, marginal bone loss after one year was significantly higher for TiZr implants (P < 0.001) as compared to traditional Ti implants. Soft tissue dimensions were stable throughout the evaluation time for both implant materials. CONCLUSIONS: One-year results indicate more pronounced initial marginal bone loss for dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy as compared to implants made of commercially pure titanium. Stilus Optimus 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7875101/ /pubmed/33598111 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403 Text en Copyright © Hultin K, Eriksson A, Backe C, Johansson U, Bougas K. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 31 December 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hultin, Kristina
Eriksson, Annelie
Backe, Christina
Johansson, Ulf
Bougas, Kostas
A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title_full A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title_fullStr A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title_short A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
title_sort pilot study with randomised controlled design comparing tizr alloy dental implants to ti implants
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598111
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403
work_keys_str_mv AT hultinkristina apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT erikssonannelie apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT backechristina apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT johanssonulf apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT bougaskostas apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT hultinkristina pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT erikssonannelie pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT backechristina pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT johanssonulf pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants
AT bougaskostas pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants