Cargando…
A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants
OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commer...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Stilus Optimus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598111 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403 |
_version_ | 1783649722835140608 |
---|---|
author | Hultin, Kristina Eriksson, Annelie Backe, Christina Johansson, Ulf Bougas, Kostas |
author_facet | Hultin, Kristina Eriksson, Annelie Backe, Christina Johansson, Ulf Bougas, Kostas |
author_sort | Hultin, Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commercially pure titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present material includes consecutive patients referred to a specialist clinic in Sweden. Two patient groups treated with dental implants in two different materials - titanium (Ti) and titanium-zirconium (TiZr) - were defined after block randomisation for smoking. In total, 40 implants installed in 21 patients were available for one-year follow-up. Marginal bone level, soft tissue height and width of keratinised mucosa were registered at baseline and at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: At implant level, the test group (TiZr) yielded significant marginal bone loss (P < 0.001) after one year. Additionally, marginal bone loss after one year was significantly higher for TiZr implants (P < 0.001) as compared to traditional Ti implants. Soft tissue dimensions were stable throughout the evaluation time for both implant materials. CONCLUSIONS: One-year results indicate more pronounced initial marginal bone loss for dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy as compared to implants made of commercially pure titanium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7875101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Stilus Optimus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78751012021-02-16 A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants Hultin, Kristina Eriksson, Annelie Backe, Christina Johansson, Ulf Bougas, Kostas J Oral Maxillofac Res Original Paper OBJECTIVES: Evidence on the clinical performance of recently introduced dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy is sparse. The aim of the present pilot study with randomized controlled design is to compare changes in supporting structures around dental titanium-zirconium alloy implants to commercially pure titanium implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present material includes consecutive patients referred to a specialist clinic in Sweden. Two patient groups treated with dental implants in two different materials - titanium (Ti) and titanium-zirconium (TiZr) - were defined after block randomisation for smoking. In total, 40 implants installed in 21 patients were available for one-year follow-up. Marginal bone level, soft tissue height and width of keratinised mucosa were registered at baseline and at one-year follow-up. RESULTS: At implant level, the test group (TiZr) yielded significant marginal bone loss (P < 0.001) after one year. Additionally, marginal bone loss after one year was significantly higher for TiZr implants (P < 0.001) as compared to traditional Ti implants. Soft tissue dimensions were stable throughout the evaluation time for both implant materials. CONCLUSIONS: One-year results indicate more pronounced initial marginal bone loss for dental implants in titanium-zirconium alloy as compared to implants made of commercially pure titanium. Stilus Optimus 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7875101/ /pubmed/33598111 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403 Text en Copyright © Hultin K, Eriksson A, Backe C, Johansson U, Bougas K. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 31 December 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hultin, Kristina Eriksson, Annelie Backe, Christina Johansson, Ulf Bougas, Kostas A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title | A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title_full | A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title_fullStr | A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title_short | A Pilot Study with Randomised Controlled Design Comparing TiZr Alloy Dental Implants to Ti Implants |
title_sort | pilot study with randomised controlled design comparing tizr alloy dental implants to ti implants |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33598111 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2020.11403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hultinkristina apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT erikssonannelie apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT backechristina apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT johanssonulf apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT bougaskostas apilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT hultinkristina pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT erikssonannelie pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT backechristina pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT johanssonulf pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants AT bougaskostas pilotstudywithrandomisedcontrolleddesigncomparingtizralloydentalimplantstotiimplants |