Cargando…

Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the feasibility of SPECT and PET Y-90 imaging, and to compare these modalities by visualizing hot and cold foci in phantoms for varying isotope concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was acquired from the Jaszczak and NEMA phantoms. In the Jaszczak phantom Y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubik, Agata, Budzyńska, Anna, Kacperski, Krzysztof, Maciak, Maciej, Kuć, Michał, Piasecki, Piotr, Wiliński, Maciej, Konior, Marcin, Dziuk, Mirosław, Iller, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246848
_version_ 1783649759794298880
author Kubik, Agata
Budzyńska, Anna
Kacperski, Krzysztof
Maciak, Maciej
Kuć, Michał
Piasecki, Piotr
Wiliński, Maciej
Konior, Marcin
Dziuk, Mirosław
Iller, Edward
author_facet Kubik, Agata
Budzyńska, Anna
Kacperski, Krzysztof
Maciak, Maciej
Kuć, Michał
Piasecki, Piotr
Wiliński, Maciej
Konior, Marcin
Dziuk, Mirosław
Iller, Edward
author_sort Kubik, Agata
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the feasibility of SPECT and PET Y-90 imaging, and to compare these modalities by visualizing hot and cold foci in phantoms for varying isotope concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was acquired from the Jaszczak and NEMA phantoms. In the Jaszczak phantom Y-90 concentrations of 0.1 MBq/ml and 0.2 MBq/ml were used, while higher concentrations, up to 1.0 MBq/ml, were simulated by acquisition time extension with respect to the standard clinical protocol of 30 sec/projection for SPECT and 30 min/bed position for PET imaging. For NEMA phantom, the hot foci had concentrations of about 4 MB/ml and the background 0.1 or 0.0 MBq/ml. All of the acquired data was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative assessment was conducted by six observers asked to identify the number of visible cold or hot foci. Inter-observer agreement was assessed. Quantitative analysis included calculations of contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and comparisons with the qualitative results. RESULTS: For SPECT data up to two cold foci were discernible, while for PET four foci were visible. We have shown that CNR (with Rose criterion) is a good measure of foci visibility for both modalities. We also found good concordance of qualitative results for the Jaszczak phantom studies between the observers (corresponding Krippendorf’s alpha coefficients of 0.76 to 0.84). In the NEMA phantom without background activity all foci were visible in SPECT/CT images. With isotope in the background, 5 of 6 spheres were discernible (CNR of 3.0 for the smallest foci). For PET studies all hot spheres were visible, regardless of the background activity. CONCLUSIONS: PET Y-90 imaging provided better results than Bremsstrahlung based SPECT imaging. This indicates that PET/CT might become the method of choice in Y-90 post radioembolization imaging for visualisation of both necrotic and hot lesions in the liver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7875374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78753742021-02-19 Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies Kubik, Agata Budzyńska, Anna Kacperski, Krzysztof Maciak, Maciej Kuć, Michał Piasecki, Piotr Wiliński, Maciej Konior, Marcin Dziuk, Mirosław Iller, Edward PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the feasibility of SPECT and PET Y-90 imaging, and to compare these modalities by visualizing hot and cold foci in phantoms for varying isotope concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was acquired from the Jaszczak and NEMA phantoms. In the Jaszczak phantom Y-90 concentrations of 0.1 MBq/ml and 0.2 MBq/ml were used, while higher concentrations, up to 1.0 MBq/ml, were simulated by acquisition time extension with respect to the standard clinical protocol of 30 sec/projection for SPECT and 30 min/bed position for PET imaging. For NEMA phantom, the hot foci had concentrations of about 4 MB/ml and the background 0.1 or 0.0 MBq/ml. All of the acquired data was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative assessment was conducted by six observers asked to identify the number of visible cold or hot foci. Inter-observer agreement was assessed. Quantitative analysis included calculations of contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and comparisons with the qualitative results. RESULTS: For SPECT data up to two cold foci were discernible, while for PET four foci were visible. We have shown that CNR (with Rose criterion) is a good measure of foci visibility for both modalities. We also found good concordance of qualitative results for the Jaszczak phantom studies between the observers (corresponding Krippendorf’s alpha coefficients of 0.76 to 0.84). In the NEMA phantom without background activity all foci were visible in SPECT/CT images. With isotope in the background, 5 of 6 spheres were discernible (CNR of 3.0 for the smallest foci). For PET studies all hot spheres were visible, regardless of the background activity. CONCLUSIONS: PET Y-90 imaging provided better results than Bremsstrahlung based SPECT imaging. This indicates that PET/CT might become the method of choice in Y-90 post radioembolization imaging for visualisation of both necrotic and hot lesions in the liver. Public Library of Science 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7875374/ /pubmed/33566845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246848 Text en © 2021 Kubik et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kubik, Agata
Budzyńska, Anna
Kacperski, Krzysztof
Maciak, Maciej
Kuć, Michał
Piasecki, Piotr
Wiliński, Maciej
Konior, Marcin
Dziuk, Mirosław
Iller, Edward
Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title_full Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title_fullStr Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title_short Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies
title_sort evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of y-90 imaging in spect/ct and pet/ct phantom studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246848
work_keys_str_mv AT kubikagata evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT budzynskaanna evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT kacperskikrzysztof evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT maciakmaciej evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT kucmichał evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT piaseckipiotr evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT wilinskimaciej evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT koniormarcin evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT dziukmirosław evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies
AT illeredward evaluationofqualitativeandquantitativedataofy90imaginginspectctandpetctphantomstudies