Cargando…

Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate and compare patient response to a conventional syringe and a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD) both immediately and after reflection time, including the impact of anesthesia duration. METHODS: Twent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flisfisch, Sohar, Woelber, Johan Peter, Walther, Winfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06012
_version_ 1783649843766362112
author Flisfisch, Sohar
Woelber, Johan Peter
Walther, Winfried
author_facet Flisfisch, Sohar
Woelber, Johan Peter
Walther, Winfried
author_sort Flisfisch, Sohar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate and compare patient response to a conventional syringe and a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD) both immediately and after reflection time, including the impact of anesthesia duration. METHODS: Twenty adult patients (10 men and 10 women) with at least two tooth-neck defects each in different quadrants were treated with local buccal infiltration anesthesia. Using split-mouth design, one quadrant was anesthetized using a conventional syringe, the other with CCLAD. The time elapsed between time of injection and time of disappearance of numbness was recorded. Patients were asked to mark on a Visual Analog Scale their visual impression of the device regarding anxiety-inducement, their sensation of mucosal puncture, pain during administration, and pain perception during treatment for the two different methods as well as future preference immediately after treatment and after reflection time. RESULTS: The level of anxiety-inducement and pain during administration were ranked three times higher with the conventional syringe (35.95%–11.85%, p < 0.001 and 21.3%–7.7%, p = 0.005, respectively). There was no difference in mean sensation of mucosal puncture, nor a statistically significant correlation between duration of administration and time until disappearance of numbness. Once anesthesia was administered, no pain during treatment was detected using either method. Patients’ preference of methods changed significantly with time in favor of CCLAD (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CCLAD increased patients' comfort visually and in terms of administration; patients’ preference in favor of CCLAD increased with time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients' preference of CCLAD over against the conventional syringe, even more so after reflection time, can imply the preference of CCLAD for clinicians, too, in order to enhance patients' and clinicians’ comfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7875824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78758242021-02-17 Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial Flisfisch, Sohar Woelber, Johan Peter Walther, Winfried Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate and compare patient response to a conventional syringe and a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD) both immediately and after reflection time, including the impact of anesthesia duration. METHODS: Twenty adult patients (10 men and 10 women) with at least two tooth-neck defects each in different quadrants were treated with local buccal infiltration anesthesia. Using split-mouth design, one quadrant was anesthetized using a conventional syringe, the other with CCLAD. The time elapsed between time of injection and time of disappearance of numbness was recorded. Patients were asked to mark on a Visual Analog Scale their visual impression of the device regarding anxiety-inducement, their sensation of mucosal puncture, pain during administration, and pain perception during treatment for the two different methods as well as future preference immediately after treatment and after reflection time. RESULTS: The level of anxiety-inducement and pain during administration were ranked three times higher with the conventional syringe (35.95%–11.85%, p < 0.001 and 21.3%–7.7%, p = 0.005, respectively). There was no difference in mean sensation of mucosal puncture, nor a statistically significant correlation between duration of administration and time until disappearance of numbness. Once anesthesia was administered, no pain during treatment was detected using either method. Patients’ preference of methods changed significantly with time in favor of CCLAD (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CCLAD increased patients' comfort visually and in terms of administration; patients’ preference in favor of CCLAD increased with time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Patients' preference of CCLAD over against the conventional syringe, even more so after reflection time, can imply the preference of CCLAD for clinicians, too, in order to enhance patients' and clinicians’ comfort. Elsevier 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7875824/ /pubmed/33604465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06012 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Flisfisch, Sohar
Woelber, Johan Peter
Walther, Winfried
Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06012
work_keys_str_mv AT flisfischsohar patientevaluationsafterlocalanesthesiawithacomputerassistedmethodandaconventionalsyringebeforeandafterreflectiontimeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woelberjohanpeter patientevaluationsafterlocalanesthesiawithacomputerassistedmethodandaconventionalsyringebeforeandafterreflectiontimeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waltherwinfried patientevaluationsafterlocalanesthesiawithacomputerassistedmethodandaconventionalsyringebeforeandafterreflectiontimeaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial