Cargando…
Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the e...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z |
_version_ | 1783649882892926976 |
---|---|
author | Yaremenko, Sergii Sauerland, Melanie Hope, Lorraine |
author_facet | Yaremenko, Sergii Sauerland, Melanie Hope, Lorraine |
author_sort | Yaremenko, Sergii |
collection | PubMed |
description | The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the evening. Performance in recall and recognition of non-facial stimuli is generally superior at an individual’s circadian peak. In two studies (Ns = 103 and 324), we tested the effect of time-of-testing optimality on eyewitness identification performance. Morning- and evening-type participants viewed stimulus films depicting staged crimes and made identification decisions from target-present and target-absent lineups either at their optimal or non-optimal time-of-day. We expected that participants would make more accurate identification decisions and that the confidence-accuracy and decision time-accuracy relationships would be stronger at optimal compared to non-optimal time of day. In Experiment 1, identification accuracy was unexpectedly superior at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day in target-present lineups. In Experiment 2, identification accuracy did not differ between the optimal and non-optimal time of day. Contrary to our expectations, confidence-accuracy relationship was generally stronger at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day. In line with our predictions, non-optimal testing eliminated decision-time-accuracy relationship in Experiment 1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7875993 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78759932021-02-11 Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality Yaremenko, Sergii Sauerland, Melanie Hope, Lorraine Sci Rep Article The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the evening. Performance in recall and recognition of non-facial stimuli is generally superior at an individual’s circadian peak. In two studies (Ns = 103 and 324), we tested the effect of time-of-testing optimality on eyewitness identification performance. Morning- and evening-type participants viewed stimulus films depicting staged crimes and made identification decisions from target-present and target-absent lineups either at their optimal or non-optimal time-of-day. We expected that participants would make more accurate identification decisions and that the confidence-accuracy and decision time-accuracy relationships would be stronger at optimal compared to non-optimal time of day. In Experiment 1, identification accuracy was unexpectedly superior at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day in target-present lineups. In Experiment 2, identification accuracy did not differ between the optimal and non-optimal time of day. Contrary to our expectations, confidence-accuracy relationship was generally stronger at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day. In line with our predictions, non-optimal testing eliminated decision-time-accuracy relationship in Experiment 1. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7875993/ /pubmed/33568717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yaremenko, Sergii Sauerland, Melanie Hope, Lorraine Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title | Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title_full | Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title_fullStr | Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title_full_unstemmed | Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title_short | Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
title_sort | eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaremenkosergii eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality AT sauerlandmelanie eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality AT hopelorraine eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality |