Cargando…

Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality

The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaremenko, Sergii, Sauerland, Melanie, Hope, Lorraine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z
_version_ 1783649882892926976
author Yaremenko, Sergii
Sauerland, Melanie
Hope, Lorraine
author_facet Yaremenko, Sergii
Sauerland, Melanie
Hope, Lorraine
author_sort Yaremenko, Sergii
collection PubMed
description The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the evening. Performance in recall and recognition of non-facial stimuli is generally superior at an individual’s circadian peak. In two studies (Ns = 103 and 324), we tested the effect of time-of-testing optimality on eyewitness identification performance. Morning- and evening-type participants viewed stimulus films depicting staged crimes and made identification decisions from target-present and target-absent lineups either at their optimal or non-optimal time-of-day. We expected that participants would make more accurate identification decisions and that the confidence-accuracy and decision time-accuracy relationships would be stronger at optimal compared to non-optimal time of day. In Experiment 1, identification accuracy was unexpectedly superior at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day in target-present lineups. In Experiment 2, identification accuracy did not differ between the optimal and non-optimal time of day. Contrary to our expectations, confidence-accuracy relationship was generally stronger at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day. In line with our predictions, non-optimal testing eliminated decision-time-accuracy relationship in Experiment 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7875993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78759932021-02-11 Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality Yaremenko, Sergii Sauerland, Melanie Hope, Lorraine Sci Rep Article The circadian rhythm regulates arousal levels throughout the day and determines optimal periods for engaging in mental activities. Individuals differ in the time of day at which they reach their peak: Morning-type individuals are at their best in the morning and evening types perform better in the evening. Performance in recall and recognition of non-facial stimuli is generally superior at an individual’s circadian peak. In two studies (Ns = 103 and 324), we tested the effect of time-of-testing optimality on eyewitness identification performance. Morning- and evening-type participants viewed stimulus films depicting staged crimes and made identification decisions from target-present and target-absent lineups either at their optimal or non-optimal time-of-day. We expected that participants would make more accurate identification decisions and that the confidence-accuracy and decision time-accuracy relationships would be stronger at optimal compared to non-optimal time of day. In Experiment 1, identification accuracy was unexpectedly superior at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day in target-present lineups. In Experiment 2, identification accuracy did not differ between the optimal and non-optimal time of day. Contrary to our expectations, confidence-accuracy relationship was generally stronger at non-optimal compared to optimal time of day. In line with our predictions, non-optimal testing eliminated decision-time-accuracy relationship in Experiment 1. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7875993/ /pubmed/33568717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Yaremenko, Sergii
Sauerland, Melanie
Hope, Lorraine
Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title_full Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title_fullStr Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title_full_unstemmed Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title_short Eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
title_sort eyewitness identification performance is not affected by time-of-day optimality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7875993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82628-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yaremenkosergii eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality
AT sauerlandmelanie eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality
AT hopelorraine eyewitnessidentificationperformanceisnotaffectedbytimeofdayoptimality