Cargando…

How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey

Background: We evaluated the frequency of subnormal erythropoietin levels, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F positivity and polycythemia vera (PV) in patients who did not meet World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 criterion for hemoglobin levels but were suggested to be investigated for PV in 2016 revision...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eren, Rafet, Sevinçoğlu, Bahar Funda, Doğan, Esma Evrim, Aydın, Demet, Nizam, Nihan, Demirel, Naciye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603984
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v14i4.4478
_version_ 1783649970262376448
author Eren, Rafet
Sevinçoğlu, Bahar Funda
Doğan, Esma Evrim
Aydın, Demet
Nizam, Nihan
Demirel, Naciye
author_facet Eren, Rafet
Sevinçoğlu, Bahar Funda
Doğan, Esma Evrim
Aydın, Demet
Nizam, Nihan
Demirel, Naciye
author_sort Eren, Rafet
collection PubMed
description Background: We evaluated the frequency of subnormal erythropoietin levels, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F positivity and polycythemia vera (PV) in patients who did not meet World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 criterion for hemoglobin levels but were suggested to be investigated for PV in 2016 revision. Materials and Methods: We assessed the data of 92 patients who were further evaluated with JAK2V617F mutation and serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels and bone marrow biopsy, if necessary. We also compared this patient group with 20 patients whose Hgb>18.5 g/dL for men and >16.5 g/dL for women. Results: Nine patients (45%) in the higher hemoglobin group were JAK2V617F positive, while 4 patients (4.3%) in the lower hemoglobin group were JAK2V617F positive (p<0.001). The number of patients with serum EPO levels <4.3 mIU/mL was significantly higher in the higher hemoglobin group (n=13, 65%) than the lower hemoglobin group (n=7, 7.6%) (p<0.001). Finally, the number of patients who received a diagnosis of PV was significantly higher in the higher hemoglobin group (n=13, 65%) than the lower hemoglobin group (n=9, 9.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We found a substantial increase in patients who were candidates for testing for PV with the introduction of WHO 2016 criteria; these patients were diagnosed with PV with a rate (9.8%) that cannot be underestimated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7876427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78764272021-02-17 How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey Eren, Rafet Sevinçoğlu, Bahar Funda Doğan, Esma Evrim Aydın, Demet Nizam, Nihan Demirel, Naciye Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res Original Article Background: We evaluated the frequency of subnormal erythropoietin levels, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F positivity and polycythemia vera (PV) in patients who did not meet World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 criterion for hemoglobin levels but were suggested to be investigated for PV in 2016 revision. Materials and Methods: We assessed the data of 92 patients who were further evaluated with JAK2V617F mutation and serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels and bone marrow biopsy, if necessary. We also compared this patient group with 20 patients whose Hgb>18.5 g/dL for men and >16.5 g/dL for women. Results: Nine patients (45%) in the higher hemoglobin group were JAK2V617F positive, while 4 patients (4.3%) in the lower hemoglobin group were JAK2V617F positive (p<0.001). The number of patients with serum EPO levels <4.3 mIU/mL was significantly higher in the higher hemoglobin group (n=13, 65%) than the lower hemoglobin group (n=7, 7.6%) (p<0.001). Finally, the number of patients who received a diagnosis of PV was significantly higher in the higher hemoglobin group (n=13, 65%) than the lower hemoglobin group (n=9, 9.8%) (p<0.001). Conclusion: We found a substantial increase in patients who were candidates for testing for PV with the introduction of WHO 2016 criteria; these patients were diagnosed with PV with a rate (9.8%) that cannot be underestimated. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7876427/ /pubmed/33603984 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v14i4.4478 Text en Copyright © 2020 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eren, Rafet
Sevinçoğlu, Bahar Funda
Doğan, Esma Evrim
Aydın, Demet
Nizam, Nihan
Demirel, Naciye
How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title_full How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title_fullStr How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title_full_unstemmed How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title_short How Does 2016 WHO Criteria for Polycythemia Vera Contribute to Our Daily Practice? A Single-Center Study from Turkey
title_sort how does 2016 who criteria for polycythemia vera contribute to our daily practice? a single-center study from turkey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603984
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijhoscr.v14i4.4478
work_keys_str_mv AT erenrafet howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey
AT sevincoglubaharfunda howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey
AT doganesmaevrim howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey
AT aydındemet howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey
AT nizamnihan howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey
AT demirelnaciye howdoes2016whocriteriaforpolycythemiaveracontributetoourdailypracticeasinglecenterstudyfromturkey