Cargando…

Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Cantero, Aitana, Reijnierse, Esmee M, Gill, Benjamin M T, Maier, Andrea B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064
_version_ 1783649971410567168
author Martin-Cantero, Aitana
Reijnierse, Esmee M
Gill, Benjamin M T
Maier, Andrea B
author_facet Martin-Cantero, Aitana
Reijnierse, Esmee M
Gill, Benjamin M T
Maier, Andrea B
author_sort Martin-Cantero, Aitana
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7876433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78764332021-02-17 Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Martin-Cantero, Aitana Reijnierse, Esmee M Gill, Benjamin M T Maier, Andrea B Nutr Rev Special Articles CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306. Oxford University Press 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7876433/ /pubmed/33031516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Special Articles
Martin-Cantero, Aitana
Reijnierse, Esmee M
Gill, Benjamin M T
Maier, Andrea B
Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Special Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064
work_keys_str_mv AT martincanteroaitana factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reijnierseesmeem factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gillbenjaminmt factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maierandreab factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis