Cargando…
Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064 |
_version_ | 1783649971410567168 |
---|---|
author | Martin-Cantero, Aitana Reijnierse, Esmee M Gill, Benjamin M T Maier, Andrea B |
author_facet | Martin-Cantero, Aitana Reijnierse, Esmee M Gill, Benjamin M T Maier, Andrea B |
author_sort | Martin-Cantero, Aitana |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7876433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78764332021-02-17 Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Martin-Cantero, Aitana Reijnierse, Esmee M Gill, Benjamin M T Maier, Andrea B Nutr Rev Special Articles CONTEXT: Nutritional interventions stimulate muscle protein synthesis in older adults. To optimize muscle mass preservation and gains, several factors, including type, dose, frequency, timing, duration, and adherence have to be considered. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize these factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception date to November 22, 2017, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, mean or median age ≥65 years, and reporting muscle mass at baseline and postintervention. Exclusion criteria included genetically inherited diseases, anabolic drugs or hormone therapies, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chronic kidney disease, kidney failure, neuromuscular disorders, and cancer. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included study characteristics (ie, population, sample size, age, sex), muscle mass measurements (ie, method, measure, unit), effect of the intervention vs the control group, and nutritional intervention factors (ie, type, composition, dose, duration, frequency, timing, and adherence). DATA ANALYSIS: Standardized mean differences and 95%CIs were calculated from baseline to postintervention. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and grouped by the type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine studies were included, encompassing 2255 participants (mean age, 78.1 years; SD, 2.22). Amino acids, creatine, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, and protein with amino acids supplementation significantly improved muscle mass. No effect was found for protein supplementation alone, protein and other components, and polyunsaturated fatty acids. High interstudy variability was observed regarding the dose, duration, and frequency, coupled with inconsistency in reporting timing and adherence. Overall, several nutritional interventions could be effective to improve muscle mass measures in older adults. Because of the substantial variability of the intervention factors among studies, the optimum profile is yet to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018111306. Oxford University Press 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7876433/ /pubmed/33031516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Special Articles Martin-Cantero, Aitana Reijnierse, Esmee M Gill, Benjamin M T Maier, Andrea B Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | factors influencing the efficacy of nutritional interventions on muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Special Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33031516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaa064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martincanteroaitana factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT reijnierseesmeem factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gillbenjaminmt factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maierandreab factorsinfluencingtheefficacyofnutritionalinterventionsonmusclemassinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |