Cargando…

How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?

PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fix...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyojune, Shin, Myung Jin, Kholinne, Erica, Seo, Janghyeon, Ahn, Duckwoo, Kim, Ji Wan, Koh, Kyoung Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744
_version_ 1783650029791084544
author Kim, Hyojune
Shin, Myung Jin
Kholinne, Erica
Seo, Janghyeon
Ahn, Duckwoo
Kim, Ji Wan
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
author_facet Kim, Hyojune
Shin, Myung Jin
Kholinne, Erica
Seo, Janghyeon
Ahn, Duckwoo
Kim, Ji Wan
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
author_sort Kim, Hyojune
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fixed by a locking plate. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were used for the following 4 groups based on the number of screws used: 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups. Interfragmentary gaps were measured following cyclic loading and compared. Consequently, the load to failure, maximum displacement, stiffness, and mode of failure at failure point were compared. RESULTS: The interfragmentary gaps for the 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups were significantly reduced by 0.24 ± 0.09 mm, 0.08 ± 0.06 mm, 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 0.03 ± 0.01 mm following 1000 cyclic loading, respectively. The loads to failure were significantly different between the groups with the 7-screw group showing the highest load to failure. The stiffness of the 7-screw group was superior compared with the 6-screw, 9-screw, and 4-screw groups. The maximum displacement before failure showed a significant difference between the comparative groups with the 4-screw group having the lowest value. The 7-screw group had the least structural failure rate (33.3%). CONCLUSION: At least 7 screws would be optimal for proximal fragment fixation of proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution to minimize secondary varus collapse or fixation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7876747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78767472021-02-22 How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation? Kim, Hyojune Shin, Myung Jin Kholinne, Erica Seo, Janghyeon Ahn, Duckwoo Kim, Ji Wan Koh, Kyoung Hwan Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fixed by a locking plate. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were used for the following 4 groups based on the number of screws used: 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups. Interfragmentary gaps were measured following cyclic loading and compared. Consequently, the load to failure, maximum displacement, stiffness, and mode of failure at failure point were compared. RESULTS: The interfragmentary gaps for the 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups were significantly reduced by 0.24 ± 0.09 mm, 0.08 ± 0.06 mm, 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 0.03 ± 0.01 mm following 1000 cyclic loading, respectively. The loads to failure were significantly different between the groups with the 7-screw group showing the highest load to failure. The stiffness of the 7-screw group was superior compared with the 6-screw, 9-screw, and 4-screw groups. The maximum displacement before failure showed a significant difference between the comparative groups with the 4-screw group having the lowest value. The 7-screw group had the least structural failure rate (33.3%). CONCLUSION: At least 7 screws would be optimal for proximal fragment fixation of proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution to minimize secondary varus collapse or fixation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study. SAGE Publications 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7876747/ /pubmed/33623724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Kim, Hyojune
Shin, Myung Jin
Kholinne, Erica
Seo, Janghyeon
Ahn, Duckwoo
Kim, Ji Wan
Koh, Kyoung Hwan
How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title_full How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title_fullStr How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title_full_unstemmed How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title_short How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
title_sort how many proximal screws are needed for a stable proximal humerus fracture fixation?
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyojune howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT shinmyungjin howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT kholinneerica howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT seojanghyeon howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT ahnduckwoo howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT kimjiwan howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation
AT kohkyounghwan howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation