Cargando…
How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation?
PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fix...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744 |
_version_ | 1783650029791084544 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyojune Shin, Myung Jin Kholinne, Erica Seo, Janghyeon Ahn, Duckwoo Kim, Ji Wan Koh, Kyoung Hwan |
author_facet | Kim, Hyojune Shin, Myung Jin Kholinne, Erica Seo, Janghyeon Ahn, Duckwoo Kim, Ji Wan Koh, Kyoung Hwan |
author_sort | Kim, Hyojune |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fixed by a locking plate. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were used for the following 4 groups based on the number of screws used: 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups. Interfragmentary gaps were measured following cyclic loading and compared. Consequently, the load to failure, maximum displacement, stiffness, and mode of failure at failure point were compared. RESULTS: The interfragmentary gaps for the 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups were significantly reduced by 0.24 ± 0.09 mm, 0.08 ± 0.06 mm, 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 0.03 ± 0.01 mm following 1000 cyclic loading, respectively. The loads to failure were significantly different between the groups with the 7-screw group showing the highest load to failure. The stiffness of the 7-screw group was superior compared with the 6-screw, 9-screw, and 4-screw groups. The maximum displacement before failure showed a significant difference between the comparative groups with the 4-screw group having the lowest value. The 7-screw group had the least structural failure rate (33.3%). CONCLUSION: At least 7 screws would be optimal for proximal fragment fixation of proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution to minimize secondary varus collapse or fixation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7876747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78767472021-02-22 How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation? Kim, Hyojune Shin, Myung Jin Kholinne, Erica Seo, Janghyeon Ahn, Duckwoo Kim, Ji Wan Koh, Kyoung Hwan Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript PURPOSE: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. METHODS: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fixed by a locking plate. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were used for the following 4 groups based on the number of screws used: 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups. Interfragmentary gaps were measured following cyclic loading and compared. Consequently, the load to failure, maximum displacement, stiffness, and mode of failure at failure point were compared. RESULTS: The interfragmentary gaps for the 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups were significantly reduced by 0.24 ± 0.09 mm, 0.08 ± 0.06 mm, 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 0.03 ± 0.01 mm following 1000 cyclic loading, respectively. The loads to failure were significantly different between the groups with the 7-screw group showing the highest load to failure. The stiffness of the 7-screw group was superior compared with the 6-screw, 9-screw, and 4-screw groups. The maximum displacement before failure showed a significant difference between the comparative groups with the 4-screw group having the lowest value. The 7-screw group had the least structural failure rate (33.3%). CONCLUSION: At least 7 screws would be optimal for proximal fragment fixation of proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution to minimize secondary varus collapse or fixation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic science study. SAGE Publications 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7876747/ /pubmed/33623724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Kim, Hyojune Shin, Myung Jin Kholinne, Erica Seo, Janghyeon Ahn, Duckwoo Kim, Ji Wan Koh, Kyoung Hwan How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation? |
title | How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus
Fracture Fixation? |
title_full | How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus
Fracture Fixation? |
title_fullStr | How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus
Fracture Fixation? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus
Fracture Fixation? |
title_short | How Many Proximal Screws Are Needed for a Stable Proximal Humerus
Fracture Fixation? |
title_sort | how many proximal screws are needed for a stable proximal humerus
fracture fixation? |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151459321992744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyojune howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT shinmyungjin howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT kholinneerica howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT seojanghyeon howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT ahnduckwoo howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT kimjiwan howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation AT kohkyounghwan howmanyproximalscrewsareneededforastableproximalhumerusfracturefixation |