Cargando…

Excited-State Geometry Optimization of Small Molecules with Many-Body Green’s Functions Theory

[Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of gas phase geometry optimizations in the excited states of carbon monoxide, acetone, acrolein, and methylenecyclopropene using many-body Green’s functions theory within the GW approximation and the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) employing numerical gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çaylak, Onur, Baumeier, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33399447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01099
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of gas phase geometry optimizations in the excited states of carbon monoxide, acetone, acrolein, and methylenecyclopropene using many-body Green’s functions theory within the GW approximation and the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) employing numerical gradients. We scrutinize the influence of several typical approximations in the GW-BSE framework; we used one-shot G(0)W(0) or eigenvalue self-consistent evGW, employing a fully analytic approach or plasmon-pole model for the frequency dependence of the electron self-energy, or performing the BSE step within the Tamm–Dancoff approximation. The obtained geometries are compared to reference results from multireference perturbation theory (CASPT2), variational Monte Carlo (VMC) method, second-order approximate coupled cluster (CC2) method, and time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT). We find overall a good agreement of the structural parameters optimized with the GW-BSE calculations with CASPT2, with an average relative error of around 1% for the G(0)W(0) and 1.5% for the evGW variants based on a PBE0 ground state, respectively, while the other approximations have negligible influence. The relative errors are also smaller than those for CC2 and TDDFT with different functionals and only larger than VMC, indicating that the GW-BSE method does not only yield excitation energies but also geometries in good agreement with established higher-order wave function methods.