Cargando…

Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND: The scope and productivity of artificial intelligence applications in health science and medicine, particularly in medical imaging, are rapidly progressing, with relatively recent developments in big data and deep learning and increasingly powerful computer algorithms. Accordingly, there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahmad, Rani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460121990296
_version_ 1783650062788722688
author Ahmad, Rani
author_facet Ahmad, Rani
author_sort Ahmad, Rani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scope and productivity of artificial intelligence applications in health science and medicine, particularly in medical imaging, are rapidly progressing, with relatively recent developments in big data and deep learning and increasingly powerful computer algorithms. Accordingly, there are a number of opportunities and challenges for the radiological community. PURPOSE: To provide review on the challenges and barriers experienced in diagnostic radiology on the basis of the key clinical applications of machine learning techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies published in 2010–2019 were selected that report on the efficacy of machine learning models. A single contingency table was selected for each study to report the highest accuracy of radiology professionals and machine learning algorithms, and a meta-analysis of studies was conducted based on contingency tables. RESULTS: The specificity for all the deep learning models ranged from 39% to 100%, whereas sensitivity ranged from 85% to 100%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 85% for the deep learning algorithms for detecting abnormalities compared to 75% and 91% for radiology experts, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity for comparison between radiology professionals and deep learning algorithms were 91% and 81% for deep learning models and 85% and 73% for radiology professionals (p < 0.000), respectively. The pooled sensitivity detection was 82% for health-care professionals and 83% for deep learning algorithms (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Radiomic information extracted through machine learning programs form images that may not be discernible through visual examination, thus may improve the prognostic and diagnostic value of data sets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7876935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78769352021-02-22 Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence Ahmad, Rani Acta Radiol Open Review BACKGROUND: The scope and productivity of artificial intelligence applications in health science and medicine, particularly in medical imaging, are rapidly progressing, with relatively recent developments in big data and deep learning and increasingly powerful computer algorithms. Accordingly, there are a number of opportunities and challenges for the radiological community. PURPOSE: To provide review on the challenges and barriers experienced in diagnostic radiology on the basis of the key clinical applications of machine learning techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies published in 2010–2019 were selected that report on the efficacy of machine learning models. A single contingency table was selected for each study to report the highest accuracy of radiology professionals and machine learning algorithms, and a meta-analysis of studies was conducted based on contingency tables. RESULTS: The specificity for all the deep learning models ranged from 39% to 100%, whereas sensitivity ranged from 85% to 100%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 85% for the deep learning algorithms for detecting abnormalities compared to 75% and 91% for radiology experts, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity for comparison between radiology professionals and deep learning algorithms were 91% and 81% for deep learning models and 85% and 73% for radiology professionals (p < 0.000), respectively. The pooled sensitivity detection was 82% for health-care professionals and 83% for deep learning algorithms (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Radiomic information extracted through machine learning programs form images that may not be discernible through visual examination, thus may improve the prognostic and diagnostic value of data sets. SAGE Publications 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7876935/ /pubmed/33623711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460121990296 Text en © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Ahmad, Rani
Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title_full Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title_fullStr Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title_short Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
title_sort reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2058460121990296
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadrani reviewingtherelationshipbetweenmachinesandradiologytheapplicationofartificialintelligence