Cargando…

The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study

BACKGROUND: The Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) introduced an EDO named the Emerald Value Option (EVO) in January 2017. The option was introduced to contain the cost of care whilst simultaneously improving the quality of care by championing care coordination. AIM: This study aimed to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willie, Michael M., Childs, Barry, Goolab, Gunvant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567847
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2292
_version_ 1783650074756120576
author Willie, Michael M.
Childs, Barry
Goolab, Gunvant
author_facet Willie, Michael M.
Childs, Barry
Goolab, Gunvant
author_sort Willie, Michael M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) introduced an EDO named the Emerald Value Option (EVO) in January 2017. The option was introduced to contain the cost of care whilst simultaneously improving the quality of care by championing care coordination. AIM: This study aimed to assess the impact of introducing an EDO such as EVO as a cost-containment strategy using contracted provider networks and coordinated care. SETTING: The study was conducted using aggregated data from GEMS. Government Employees Medical Scheme is a restricted medical scheme available to government employees in South Africa. METHODS: This is a descriptive pairwise comparison study between the Emerald benefit option (the parent option), which does not have embedded care coordination, and its derivative, EVO. RESULTS: Membership and claims data for 2018 were analysed. Expenditure per life per month in 2018 on the EVO amounts to R1357.01. After adjusting for the risk profile of beneficiaries on the EVO, expenditure per life per month would be expected to be R1621.73 (based on the conventional Emerald option). This translates to a savings of 16.3%. Similarly, health outcomes for EVO were more favourable than expected, actual admission rates were lower at 23.2% versus 26.2% expected. CONCLUSIONS: The EVO benefit design has succeeded in lowering the cost of care through network provider contracting and care coordination. The EVO has saved approximately R490 million in healthcare costs in 2018. If applied across the medical schemes industry, it is estimated that EVO contracting, and care coordination principles could save R20 billion per annum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7876986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78769862021-02-17 The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study Willie, Michael M. Childs, Barry Goolab, Gunvant Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) introduced an EDO named the Emerald Value Option (EVO) in January 2017. The option was introduced to contain the cost of care whilst simultaneously improving the quality of care by championing care coordination. AIM: This study aimed to assess the impact of introducing an EDO such as EVO as a cost-containment strategy using contracted provider networks and coordinated care. SETTING: The study was conducted using aggregated data from GEMS. Government Employees Medical Scheme is a restricted medical scheme available to government employees in South Africa. METHODS: This is a descriptive pairwise comparison study between the Emerald benefit option (the parent option), which does not have embedded care coordination, and its derivative, EVO. RESULTS: Membership and claims data for 2018 were analysed. Expenditure per life per month in 2018 on the EVO amounts to R1357.01. After adjusting for the risk profile of beneficiaries on the EVO, expenditure per life per month would be expected to be R1621.73 (based on the conventional Emerald option). This translates to a savings of 16.3%. Similarly, health outcomes for EVO were more favourable than expected, actual admission rates were lower at 23.2% versus 26.2% expected. CONCLUSIONS: The EVO benefit design has succeeded in lowering the cost of care through network provider contracting and care coordination. The EVO has saved approximately R490 million in healthcare costs in 2018. If applied across the medical schemes industry, it is estimated that EVO contracting, and care coordination principles could save R20 billion per annum. AOSIS 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7876986/ /pubmed/33567847 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2292 Text en © 2021. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Willie, Michael M.
Childs, Barry
Goolab, Gunvant
The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title_full The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title_fullStr The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title_full_unstemmed The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title_short The value proposition of efficiency discount options: The government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
title_sort value proposition of efficiency discount options: the government employees medical scheme emerald value option case study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7876986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567847
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2292
work_keys_str_mv AT williemichaelm thevaluepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy
AT childsbarry thevaluepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy
AT goolabgunvant thevaluepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy
AT williemichaelm valuepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy
AT childsbarry valuepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy
AT goolabgunvant valuepropositionofefficiencydiscountoptionsthegovernmentemployeesmedicalschemeemeraldvalueoptioncasestudy