Cargando…

Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein

BACKGROUND: In quantitative chemical risk assessment, a reference value is an estimate of an exposure to a chemical that is “likely to be without appreciable risk.” Because current “deterministic” approaches do not quantitatively characterize the likelihood or severity of harm, the National Academie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blessinger, Todd, Davis, Allen, Chiu, Weihsueh A., Stanek, John, Woodall, George M., Gift, Jeff, Thayer, Kristina A., Bussard, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32768806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105953
_version_ 1783650078029774848
author Blessinger, Todd
Davis, Allen
Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Stanek, John
Woodall, George M.
Gift, Jeff
Thayer, Kristina A.
Bussard, David
author_facet Blessinger, Todd
Davis, Allen
Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Stanek, John
Woodall, George M.
Gift, Jeff
Thayer, Kristina A.
Bussard, David
author_sort Blessinger, Todd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In quantitative chemical risk assessment, a reference value is an estimate of an exposure to a chemical that is “likely to be without appreciable risk.” Because current “deterministic” approaches do not quantitatively characterize the likelihood or severity of harm, the National Academies has recommended using reference values derived from a risk-specific dose that are treated as random variables, with probability distributions characterizing uncertainty and variability. OBJECTIVES: In order to build familiarity and address issues needed for routine and standardized derivation of probabilistic risk-specific dose distributions, a case example applying the unified probabilistic framework presented in Chiu and Slob (2015) is developed for acrolein. This case study is based on an updated systematic evidence map of literature (Keshava et al., 2020) identifying nasal lesions reported in Dorman et al. (2008) as the most appropriate endpoint and study for reference value derivation. METHODS: The probability distribution was calculated for the risk-specific dose, which in this implementation of the approach was calculated for the dose at which 1% of the human population is estimated to experience minimal lesions, and a probabilistic reference value was computed as the 5th percentile of this distribution. A deterministic reference value was also derived for comparison, and a sensitivity analysis of the probabilistic reference value was conducted investigating alternative assumptions for the point of departure type and exposure duration. RESULTS: The probabilistic reference value of 6 × 10(−4) mg/m(3) was slightly lower than the deterministic reference value of 8 × 10(−4) mg/m(3), and the risk-specific dose distribution had an uncertainty spanning a factor of 137 (95th-5th percentile ratio). Sensitivity analysis yielded slightly higher probabilistic reference values ranging between 9 × 10(−4) mg/m(3) and 2 × 10(−3) mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: Using a probabilistic approach for deriving a reference value allows quantitative characterization of the severity, incidence, and uncertainty of effects at a given dose. The results can be used to inform risk management decisions and improve risk communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78770012021-02-11 Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein Blessinger, Todd Davis, Allen Chiu, Weihsueh A. Stanek, John Woodall, George M. Gift, Jeff Thayer, Kristina A. Bussard, David Environ Int Article BACKGROUND: In quantitative chemical risk assessment, a reference value is an estimate of an exposure to a chemical that is “likely to be without appreciable risk.” Because current “deterministic” approaches do not quantitatively characterize the likelihood or severity of harm, the National Academies has recommended using reference values derived from a risk-specific dose that are treated as random variables, with probability distributions characterizing uncertainty and variability. OBJECTIVES: In order to build familiarity and address issues needed for routine and standardized derivation of probabilistic risk-specific dose distributions, a case example applying the unified probabilistic framework presented in Chiu and Slob (2015) is developed for acrolein. This case study is based on an updated systematic evidence map of literature (Keshava et al., 2020) identifying nasal lesions reported in Dorman et al. (2008) as the most appropriate endpoint and study for reference value derivation. METHODS: The probability distribution was calculated for the risk-specific dose, which in this implementation of the approach was calculated for the dose at which 1% of the human population is estimated to experience minimal lesions, and a probabilistic reference value was computed as the 5th percentile of this distribution. A deterministic reference value was also derived for comparison, and a sensitivity analysis of the probabilistic reference value was conducted investigating alternative assumptions for the point of departure type and exposure duration. RESULTS: The probabilistic reference value of 6 × 10(−4) mg/m(3) was slightly lower than the deterministic reference value of 8 × 10(−4) mg/m(3), and the risk-specific dose distribution had an uncertainty spanning a factor of 137 (95th-5th percentile ratio). Sensitivity analysis yielded slightly higher probabilistic reference values ranging between 9 × 10(−4) mg/m(3) and 2 × 10(−3) mg/m(3). CONCLUSIONS: Using a probabilistic approach for deriving a reference value allows quantitative characterization of the severity, incidence, and uncertainty of effects at a given dose. The results can be used to inform risk management decisions and improve risk communication. 2020-08-05 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7877001/ /pubmed/32768806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105953 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Blessinger, Todd
Davis, Allen
Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Stanek, John
Woodall, George M.
Gift, Jeff
Thayer, Kristina A.
Bussard, David
Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title_full Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title_fullStr Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title_full_unstemmed Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title_short Application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
title_sort application of a unified probabilistic framework to the dose-response assessment of acrolein
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32768806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105953
work_keys_str_mv AT blessingertodd applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT davisallen applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT chiuweihsueha applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT stanekjohn applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT woodallgeorgem applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT giftjeff applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT thayerkristinaa applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein
AT bussarddavid applicationofaunifiedprobabilisticframeworktothedoseresponseassessmentofacrolein