Cargando…

Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study

BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McAvoy, Cayla R., Moore, Christopher C., Aguiar, Elroy J., Ducharme, Scott W., Schuna, John M., Barreira, Tiago V., Chase, Colleen J., Gould, Zachary R., Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A., Chipkin, Stuart R., Staudenmayer, John, Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w
_version_ 1783650083188768768
author McAvoy, Cayla R.
Moore, Christopher C.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Ducharme, Scott W.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
author_facet McAvoy, Cayla R.
Moore, Christopher C.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Ducharme, Scott W.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
author_sort McAvoy, Cayla R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively-defined moderate (≥ 64% heart rate maximum [HR(max) = 220-age], ≥ 40%HR reserve [HRR = HR(max) -HR(resting), and ≥ 12 Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]); or vigorous intensity (≥ 77%HR(max), ≥ 60%HRR, and ≥ 14 RPE). PURPOSE: To identify heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding with relatively-defined moderate and vigorous intensity in 21–60-year-olds. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 157 adults (40.4 ± 11.5 years; 50.6% men) completed up to twelve 5-min treadmill bouts, beginning at 0.5 mph and increasing by 0.5 mph. Steps were directly observed, HR was measured with chest-worn monitors, and RPE was queried in the final minute of each bout. Segmented mixed model regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified optimal cadence thresholds, stratified by age (21–30, 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 years). Reconciliation of the two analytical models, including trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, yielded final heuristic cadences. RESULTS: Across all moderate intensity indicators, the segmented regression models estimated optimal cadence thresholds ranging from 123.8–127.5 (ages 21–30), 121.3–126.0 (ages 31–40), 117.7–122.7 (ages 41–50), and 113.3–116.1 steps/min (ages 51–60). Corresponding values for vigorous intensity were 140.3–144.1, 140.2–142.6, 139.3–143.6, and 131.6–132.8 steps/min, respectively. ROC analysis estimated chronologically-arranged age groups’ cadence thresholds ranging from 114.5–118, 113.5–114.5, 104.6–112.9, and 103.6–106.0 across all moderate intensity indicators, and 127.5, 121.5, 117.2–123.2, and 113.0 steps/min, respectively, for vigorous intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding to relatively-defined moderate intensity for the chronologically-arranged age groups were ≥ 120, 120, 115, and 105 steps/min, regardless of the intensity indicator (i.e., % HR(max), %HRR, or RPE). Corresponding heuristic values for vigorous intensity indicators were ≥ 135, 130, 125, and 120 steps/min. These cadences are useful for predicting/programming intensity aligned with age-associated differences in physiological response to, and perceived experiences of, moderate and/or vigorous intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78770252021-02-11 Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study McAvoy, Cayla R. Moore, Christopher C. Aguiar, Elroy J. Ducharme, Scott W. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively-defined moderate (≥ 64% heart rate maximum [HR(max) = 220-age], ≥ 40%HR reserve [HRR = HR(max) -HR(resting), and ≥ 12 Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]); or vigorous intensity (≥ 77%HR(max), ≥ 60%HRR, and ≥ 14 RPE). PURPOSE: To identify heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding with relatively-defined moderate and vigorous intensity in 21–60-year-olds. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 157 adults (40.4 ± 11.5 years; 50.6% men) completed up to twelve 5-min treadmill bouts, beginning at 0.5 mph and increasing by 0.5 mph. Steps were directly observed, HR was measured with chest-worn monitors, and RPE was queried in the final minute of each bout. Segmented mixed model regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified optimal cadence thresholds, stratified by age (21–30, 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 years). Reconciliation of the two analytical models, including trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, yielded final heuristic cadences. RESULTS: Across all moderate intensity indicators, the segmented regression models estimated optimal cadence thresholds ranging from 123.8–127.5 (ages 21–30), 121.3–126.0 (ages 31–40), 117.7–122.7 (ages 41–50), and 113.3–116.1 steps/min (ages 51–60). Corresponding values for vigorous intensity were 140.3–144.1, 140.2–142.6, 139.3–143.6, and 131.6–132.8 steps/min, respectively. ROC analysis estimated chronologically-arranged age groups’ cadence thresholds ranging from 114.5–118, 113.5–114.5, 104.6–112.9, and 103.6–106.0 across all moderate intensity indicators, and 127.5, 121.5, 117.2–123.2, and 113.0 steps/min, respectively, for vigorous intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding to relatively-defined moderate intensity for the chronologically-arranged age groups were ≥ 120, 120, 115, and 105 steps/min, regardless of the intensity indicator (i.e., % HR(max), %HRR, or RPE). Corresponding heuristic values for vigorous intensity indicators were ≥ 135, 130, 125, and 120 steps/min. These cadences are useful for predicting/programming intensity aligned with age-associated differences in physiological response to, and perceived experiences of, moderate and/or vigorous intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w. BioMed Central 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7877025/ /pubmed/33568188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
McAvoy, Cayla R.
Moore, Christopher C.
Aguiar, Elroy J.
Ducharme, Scott W.
Schuna, John M.
Barreira, Tiago V.
Chase, Colleen J.
Gould, Zachary R.
Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A.
Chipkin, Stuart R.
Staudenmayer, John
Tudor-Locke, Catrine
Mora-Gonzalez, Jose
Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title_full Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title_fullStr Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title_full_unstemmed Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title_short Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
title_sort cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the cadence-adults study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mcavoycaylar cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT moorechristopherc cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT aguiarelroyj cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT ducharmescottw cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT schunajohnm cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT barreiratiagov cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT chasecolleenj cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT gouldzacharyr cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT amalbertbirrielmarcosa cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT chipkinstuartr cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT staudenmayerjohn cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT tudorlockecatrine cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT moragonzalezjose cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy