Cargando…
Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study
BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w |
_version_ | 1783650083188768768 |
---|---|
author | McAvoy, Cayla R. Moore, Christopher C. Aguiar, Elroy J. Ducharme, Scott W. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose |
author_facet | McAvoy, Cayla R. Moore, Christopher C. Aguiar, Elroy J. Ducharme, Scott W. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose |
author_sort | McAvoy, Cayla R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively-defined moderate (≥ 64% heart rate maximum [HR(max) = 220-age], ≥ 40%HR reserve [HRR = HR(max) -HR(resting), and ≥ 12 Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]); or vigorous intensity (≥ 77%HR(max), ≥ 60%HRR, and ≥ 14 RPE). PURPOSE: To identify heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding with relatively-defined moderate and vigorous intensity in 21–60-year-olds. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 157 adults (40.4 ± 11.5 years; 50.6% men) completed up to twelve 5-min treadmill bouts, beginning at 0.5 mph and increasing by 0.5 mph. Steps were directly observed, HR was measured with chest-worn monitors, and RPE was queried in the final minute of each bout. Segmented mixed model regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified optimal cadence thresholds, stratified by age (21–30, 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 years). Reconciliation of the two analytical models, including trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, yielded final heuristic cadences. RESULTS: Across all moderate intensity indicators, the segmented regression models estimated optimal cadence thresholds ranging from 123.8–127.5 (ages 21–30), 121.3–126.0 (ages 31–40), 117.7–122.7 (ages 41–50), and 113.3–116.1 steps/min (ages 51–60). Corresponding values for vigorous intensity were 140.3–144.1, 140.2–142.6, 139.3–143.6, and 131.6–132.8 steps/min, respectively. ROC analysis estimated chronologically-arranged age groups’ cadence thresholds ranging from 114.5–118, 113.5–114.5, 104.6–112.9, and 103.6–106.0 across all moderate intensity indicators, and 127.5, 121.5, 117.2–123.2, and 113.0 steps/min, respectively, for vigorous intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding to relatively-defined moderate intensity for the chronologically-arranged age groups were ≥ 120, 120, 115, and 105 steps/min, regardless of the intensity indicator (i.e., % HR(max), %HRR, or RPE). Corresponding heuristic values for vigorous intensity indicators were ≥ 135, 130, 125, and 120 steps/min. These cadences are useful for predicting/programming intensity aligned with age-associated differences in physiological response to, and perceived experiences of, moderate and/or vigorous intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7877025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78770252021-02-11 Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study McAvoy, Cayla R. Moore, Christopher C. Aguiar, Elroy J. Ducharme, Scott W. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Heuristic cadence (steps/min) thresholds of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min correspond with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O(2)·kg(− 1)·min(− 1)) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity, respectively. Scarce evidence informs cadence thresholds for relatively-defined moderate (≥ 64% heart rate maximum [HR(max) = 220-age], ≥ 40%HR reserve [HRR = HR(max) -HR(resting), and ≥ 12 Rating of Perceived Exertion [RPE]); or vigorous intensity (≥ 77%HR(max), ≥ 60%HRR, and ≥ 14 RPE). PURPOSE: To identify heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding with relatively-defined moderate and vigorous intensity in 21–60-year-olds. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 157 adults (40.4 ± 11.5 years; 50.6% men) completed up to twelve 5-min treadmill bouts, beginning at 0.5 mph and increasing by 0.5 mph. Steps were directly observed, HR was measured with chest-worn monitors, and RPE was queried in the final minute of each bout. Segmented mixed model regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses identified optimal cadence thresholds, stratified by age (21–30, 31–40, 41–50, and 51–60 years). Reconciliation of the two analytical models, including trade-offs between sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy, yielded final heuristic cadences. RESULTS: Across all moderate intensity indicators, the segmented regression models estimated optimal cadence thresholds ranging from 123.8–127.5 (ages 21–30), 121.3–126.0 (ages 31–40), 117.7–122.7 (ages 41–50), and 113.3–116.1 steps/min (ages 51–60). Corresponding values for vigorous intensity were 140.3–144.1, 140.2–142.6, 139.3–143.6, and 131.6–132.8 steps/min, respectively. ROC analysis estimated chronologically-arranged age groups’ cadence thresholds ranging from 114.5–118, 113.5–114.5, 104.6–112.9, and 103.6–106.0 across all moderate intensity indicators, and 127.5, 121.5, 117.2–123.2, and 113.0 steps/min, respectively, for vigorous intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Heuristic cadence thresholds corresponding to relatively-defined moderate intensity for the chronologically-arranged age groups were ≥ 120, 120, 115, and 105 steps/min, regardless of the intensity indicator (i.e., % HR(max), %HRR, or RPE). Corresponding heuristic values for vigorous intensity indicators were ≥ 135, 130, 125, and 120 steps/min. These cadences are useful for predicting/programming intensity aligned with age-associated differences in physiological response to, and perceived experiences of, moderate and/or vigorous intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258. Registered 24 December 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w. BioMed Central 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7877025/ /pubmed/33568188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research McAvoy, Cayla R. Moore, Christopher C. Aguiar, Elroy J. Ducharme, Scott W. Schuna, John M. Barreira, Tiago V. Chase, Colleen J. Gould, Zachary R. Amalbert-Birriel, Marcos A. Chipkin, Stuart R. Staudenmayer, John Tudor-Locke, Catrine Mora-Gonzalez, Jose Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title | Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title_full | Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title_fullStr | Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title_short | Cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the CADENCE-adults study |
title_sort | cadence (steps/min) and relative intensity in 21 to 60-year-olds: the cadence-adults study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33568188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01096-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcavoycaylar cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT moorechristopherc cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT aguiarelroyj cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT ducharmescottw cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT schunajohnm cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT barreiratiagov cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT chasecolleenj cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT gouldzacharyr cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT amalbertbirrielmarcosa cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT chipkinstuartr cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT staudenmayerjohn cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT tudorlockecatrine cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy AT moragonzalezjose cadencestepsminandrelativeintensityin21to60yearoldsthecadenceadultsstudy |