Cargando…

Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience

BACKGROUND: Two prospective randomized studies analysing cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and rapid development of systemic adjuvant therapy have changed our approach to stage III CM treatment. The aim of this study was to compare results of retrospective su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peric, Barbara, Milicevic, Sara, Perhavec, Andraz, Hocevar, Marko, Zgajnar, Janez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0056
_version_ 1783650133901049856
author Peric, Barbara
Milicevic, Sara
Perhavec, Andraz
Hocevar, Marko
Zgajnar, Janez
author_facet Peric, Barbara
Milicevic, Sara
Perhavec, Andraz
Hocevar, Marko
Zgajnar, Janez
author_sort Peric, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two prospective randomized studies analysing cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and rapid development of systemic adjuvant therapy have changed our approach to stage III CM treatment. The aim of this study was to compare results of retrospective survival analysis of stage III CM patients’ treatment from Slovenian national CM register to leading international clinical guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2000, all Slovenian CM patients with primary tumour ≥ TIb are treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and data are prospectively collected into a national CM registry. A retrospective analysis of 2426 sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and 789 lymphadenectomies performed until 2015 was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Positive SLN was found in 519/2426 (21.4%) of patients and completion dissection (CLND) was performed in 455 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of CLND group was 58% vs. 47% of metachronous metastases group (MLNM) (p = 0.003). The 5-year OS of patients with lymph node (LN) metastases and unknown primary site (UPM) was 45% vs. 21% of patients with synchronous LN metastasis. Patients with SLN tumour burden < 0.3 mm had 5-year OS similar to SLN negative patients (86% vs. 85%; p = 0.926). The 5-year OS of patients with burden > 1.0 mm was similar to the MLNM group (49% vs. 47%; p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Stage III melanoma patients is a heterogeneous group with significant OS differences. CLND after positive SLNB might still remain a method of treatment for selected patients with stage III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78772672021-03-01 Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience Peric, Barbara Milicevic, Sara Perhavec, Andraz Hocevar, Marko Zgajnar, Janez Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: Two prospective randomized studies analysing cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and rapid development of systemic adjuvant therapy have changed our approach to stage III CM treatment. The aim of this study was to compare results of retrospective survival analysis of stage III CM patients’ treatment from Slovenian national CM register to leading international clinical guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2000, all Slovenian CM patients with primary tumour ≥ TIb are treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and data are prospectively collected into a national CM registry. A retrospective analysis of 2426 sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and 789 lymphadenectomies performed until 2015 was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Positive SLN was found in 519/2426 (21.4%) of patients and completion dissection (CLND) was performed in 455 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of CLND group was 58% vs. 47% of metachronous metastases group (MLNM) (p = 0.003). The 5-year OS of patients with lymph node (LN) metastases and unknown primary site (UPM) was 45% vs. 21% of patients with synchronous LN metastasis. Patients with SLN tumour burden < 0.3 mm had 5-year OS similar to SLN negative patients (86% vs. 85%; p = 0.926). The 5-year OS of patients with burden > 1.0 mm was similar to the MLNM group (49% vs. 47%; p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Stage III melanoma patients is a heterogeneous group with significant OS differences. CLND after positive SLNB might still remain a method of treatment for selected patients with stage III. Sciendo 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7877267/ /pubmed/33885234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0056 Text en © 2021 Barbara Peric, Sara Milicevic, Andraz Perhavec, Marko Hocevar, Janez Zgajnar, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peric, Barbara
Milicevic, Sara
Perhavec, Andraz
Hocevar, Marko
Zgajnar, Janez
Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title_full Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title_fullStr Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title_full_unstemmed Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title_short Completely Resected Stage III Melanoma Controversy - 15 Years of National Tertiary Centre Experience
title_sort completely resected stage iii melanoma controversy - 15 years of national tertiary centre experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2020-0056
work_keys_str_mv AT pericbarbara completelyresectedstageiiimelanomacontroversy15yearsofnationaltertiarycentreexperience
AT milicevicsara completelyresectedstageiiimelanomacontroversy15yearsofnationaltertiarycentreexperience
AT perhavecandraz completelyresectedstageiiimelanomacontroversy15yearsofnationaltertiarycentreexperience
AT hocevarmarko completelyresectedstageiiimelanomacontroversy15yearsofnationaltertiarycentreexperience
AT zgajnarjanez completelyresectedstageiiimelanomacontroversy15yearsofnationaltertiarycentreexperience