Cargando…

Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐in situ hybridization (HER2‐ISH) is widely approved for diagnostic, prognostic biomarker testing of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue blocks. However, cytologic ISH analysis has a potential advantage in tumor samples such as pleural effusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke, Imai, Kazuhiro, Nanjo, Hiroshi, Wakamatsu, Yuki, Kimura, Yoshihiko, Katayose, Yoshihisa, Kamata, Shuichi, Terata, Kaori, Takahashi, Eriko, Ibonai, Ayano, Yamaguchi, Ayuko, Konno, Hikari, Yatsuyanagi, Misako, Kudo, Chiaki, Takashima, Shinogu, Akagami, Yoichi, Nakamura, Ryuta, Sato, Yusuke, Motoyama, Satoru, Nomura, Kyoko, Minamiya, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3626
_version_ 1783650152047706112
author Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke
Imai, Kazuhiro
Nanjo, Hiroshi
Wakamatsu, Yuki
Kimura, Yoshihiko
Katayose, Yoshihisa
Kamata, Shuichi
Terata, Kaori
Takahashi, Eriko
Ibonai, Ayano
Yamaguchi, Ayuko
Konno, Hikari
Yatsuyanagi, Misako
Kudo, Chiaki
Takashima, Shinogu
Akagami, Yoichi
Nakamura, Ryuta
Sato, Yusuke
Motoyama, Satoru
Nomura, Kyoko
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
author_facet Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke
Imai, Kazuhiro
Nanjo, Hiroshi
Wakamatsu, Yuki
Kimura, Yoshihiko
Katayose, Yoshihisa
Kamata, Shuichi
Terata, Kaori
Takahashi, Eriko
Ibonai, Ayano
Yamaguchi, Ayuko
Konno, Hikari
Yatsuyanagi, Misako
Kudo, Chiaki
Takashima, Shinogu
Akagami, Yoichi
Nakamura, Ryuta
Sato, Yusuke
Motoyama, Satoru
Nomura, Kyoko
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
author_sort Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐in situ hybridization (HER2‐ISH) is widely approved for diagnostic, prognostic biomarker testing of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue blocks. However, cytologic ISH analysis has a potential advantage in tumor samples such as pleural effusion and ascites that are difficult to obtain the histological specimens. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical reliability of a novel rapid cytologic HER2 fluorescence ISH protocol (rapid‐CytoFISH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a new device, we applied a high‐voltage/frequency, noncontact alternating current electric field to tissue imprints and needle rinses, which mixed the probe within microdroplets as the voltage was switched on and off (AC mixing). Cytologic samples (n = 143) were collected from patients with immunohistochemically identified HER2 breast cancers. The specimens were then tested using standard dual‐color ISH using formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue (FFPE‐tissue DISH) for HER2‐targeted therapies, CytoFISH, and rapid‐CytoFISH (completed within 4 h). RESULTS: All 143 collected cytologic specimens (50 imprinted cytology specimens from resected tumors and 93 liquid‐based cytology specimens from needle rinses) were suitable for FISH analysis. The HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP) 17 ratios did not significantly differ between FFPE‐tissue DISH and either CytoFISH protocol. Based on HER2 scoring criteria, we found 95.1% agreement between FFPE‐tissue DISH and CytoFISH (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.771 and 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.614–0.927). CONCLUSION: CytoFISH could potentially serve as a clinical tool for prompt determination of HER2 status in breast cancer cytology. Rapid‐CytoFISH with AC mixing will enable cancer diagnoses and HER2 status to be determined on the same day a patient comes to a clinic or hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78773632021-02-18 Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke Imai, Kazuhiro Nanjo, Hiroshi Wakamatsu, Yuki Kimura, Yoshihiko Katayose, Yoshihisa Kamata, Shuichi Terata, Kaori Takahashi, Eriko Ibonai, Ayano Yamaguchi, Ayuko Konno, Hikari Yatsuyanagi, Misako Kudo, Chiaki Takashima, Shinogu Akagami, Yoichi Nakamura, Ryuta Sato, Yusuke Motoyama, Satoru Nomura, Kyoko Minamiya, Yoshihiro Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐in situ hybridization (HER2‐ISH) is widely approved for diagnostic, prognostic biomarker testing of formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue blocks. However, cytologic ISH analysis has a potential advantage in tumor samples such as pleural effusion and ascites that are difficult to obtain the histological specimens. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical reliability of a novel rapid cytologic HER2 fluorescence ISH protocol (rapid‐CytoFISH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a new device, we applied a high‐voltage/frequency, noncontact alternating current electric field to tissue imprints and needle rinses, which mixed the probe within microdroplets as the voltage was switched on and off (AC mixing). Cytologic samples (n = 143) were collected from patients with immunohistochemically identified HER2 breast cancers. The specimens were then tested using standard dual‐color ISH using formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue (FFPE‐tissue DISH) for HER2‐targeted therapies, CytoFISH, and rapid‐CytoFISH (completed within 4 h). RESULTS: All 143 collected cytologic specimens (50 imprinted cytology specimens from resected tumors and 93 liquid‐based cytology specimens from needle rinses) were suitable for FISH analysis. The HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP) 17 ratios did not significantly differ between FFPE‐tissue DISH and either CytoFISH protocol. Based on HER2 scoring criteria, we found 95.1% agreement between FFPE‐tissue DISH and CytoFISH (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.771 and 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.614–0.927). CONCLUSION: CytoFISH could potentially serve as a clinical tool for prompt determination of HER2 status in breast cancer cytology. Rapid‐CytoFISH with AC mixing will enable cancer diagnoses and HER2 status to be determined on the same day a patient comes to a clinic or hospital. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7877363/ /pubmed/33280268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3626 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Watanabe, Shin‐nosuke
Imai, Kazuhiro
Nanjo, Hiroshi
Wakamatsu, Yuki
Kimura, Yoshihiko
Katayose, Yoshihisa
Kamata, Shuichi
Terata, Kaori
Takahashi, Eriko
Ibonai, Ayano
Yamaguchi, Ayuko
Konno, Hikari
Yatsuyanagi, Misako
Kudo, Chiaki
Takashima, Shinogu
Akagami, Yoichi
Nakamura, Ryuta
Sato, Yusuke
Motoyama, Satoru
Nomura, Kyoko
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title_full Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title_fullStr Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title_full_unstemmed Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title_short Rapid HER2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
title_sort rapid her2 cytologic fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer using noncontact alternating current electric field mixing
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33280268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3626
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabeshinnosuke rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT imaikazuhiro rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT nanjohiroshi rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT wakamatsuyuki rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT kimurayoshihiko rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT katayoseyoshihisa rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT kamatashuichi rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT teratakaori rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT takahashieriko rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT ibonaiayano rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT yamaguchiayuko rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT konnohikari rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT yatsuyanagimisako rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT kudochiaki rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT takashimashinogu rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT akagamiyoichi rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT nakamuraryuta rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT satoyusuke rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT motoyamasatoru rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT nomurakyoko rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing
AT minamiyayoshihiro rapidher2cytologicfluorescenceinsituhybridizationforbreastcancerusingnoncontactalternatingcurrentelectricfieldmixing